Reichskirchenfuhrer Williams looked down at his image in the mirror before him. He admired the sleek dark lines of his deep black apparel. He noticed the fetching, white military style clerical collar with the comely ‘SS ’ runes, denoting Synod Staffel in, Greek New Testament script, stamped either side of his neck. He raised himself up and placing his hands behind his back, admired his equally dark black gaiters…He looked down at his equally black shoes…. ‘Das ist richtig!’ he murmured to himself ‘Ein Perfekt Synod Staffel soldaten und Offizier!’
A knock came at the door. ‘Ja!?’ Who is das?’ he replied…
‘Mein Reichkirchensfuhrer, It ist Untervicar Smythe!’
‘Enter!’
A little man dressed in the uniform of a full Untervicar came in. He raised his right arm in salute. ‘Heil Brown!’ The Reichskirchenfuhrer acknowledged it with a simple raising of his right lower arm; an almost dismissive gesture.
‘Vat ist it you vish fur Smythe?’
‘Mein team und me haf completed the study and plans to extend Sharia Law mein Reichskirchenfuhrer!’
Reichkirchenfuhrer Williams stared at the little man. He thought he looked just like a little mongrel dog he used to kick about the church pews after a bad Sunday service…
Ach so, das ist gut! Soon we vill haf a Islamischer stadt und Church ja? Gut work Smythe, I shall recommend you fur der Iron Crucifix Second Class!’
The little mongrel like Untervicar looked crestfallen.
‘Vot is wrong Smythe?’
‘Er only second class mein Reichskirchenfuher!?’
‘Ja you spelt Islam mit two ‘Ls’, Zey have stated that you haf insulted Islam, und you would not like to be under a fatwa eh Smythe?’
The little Untervicar visibly shaking in fear replied, ‘Off course not Herr Reichskirchenfuher!’
‘Sehr Gut, Smythe, be grateful to your Meister fur small Christian mercies ja?’
‘Danke! Herr Reichskirchenfuhrer!’
‘You are forgiven UnterVicar!’
He clicked his gaiters and saluting about turned.
Rowan Williams dreaded head of the Synod Staffel, walked over to his phone. He raised the receiver and asked his secretary to come in. An elderly woman of pinch faced looks entered. She wore a grey paisley print dress, and small spectacles that gave her thin face, deathly skull like qualities.
‘Ach Mildred! Be so kind as to take a dictation bitter, und transmit by urgent Reichskirchen poste to my colleague in York. You vill also tramsit ein copy fur der Fuhrer in Westminster ja?’
The woman was deeply in love with her Clerical master. ‘Oh he so commanding and manly’ she thought to herself. She looked at his sharp brown eyes, the dark manly beard, the distinguished Aryan features-she felt her knees weaken.
‘Ach ist der ein problem Fraulein? You haf gone deep red!?’
‘Oh sorry Herr Reichskirchenfuher! It must be the weather!’
‘Shall I turn the heating down?’
‘Oh no Herr Reichskirchenfuhrer!’
‘It is der juden schwein selling us short as usual! One day we shall settle accounts mit dem ja!?’ Der last delivery from Cohen und son contained pig’s fat you know!’
‘Oh really Reichskirchefuhrer?’
‘Ja Fraulien, der schwein knew we supplied the local area mosques! Mein Gott did der Islamischer meister throw ein wobbly! He threatened to decapitate der entire Reichskirchen! ‘’Kuffar pigs!’’ he ranted! He threatened us mit no more interfaith dialogue!’
‘Dreadful situation, Herr Reichskirchenfuhrer!’
He was visibly sweating… ‘Ve could haf lost our heads ja? You must be careful mit der Islamisher volk hein? Now to business! Begin bitter!’
‘Dear John,
Our holy Brother auf York in Christ, ve nicht understand your objections to the new ranks and titles, recently applied by the Synod Staffel! Vos ist der problem mein Brother auf Christ? It has also been reported that you are still holding strict Church of England services contrary to SS Ordnung B3, instructing dat all der services, ist Multifaith! Dieses instruczion ist nicht voluntary but ein Fuhrerkommand auf Downing Strasse Hauptkommandantur! Your name has been mentioned by Frauleins Smith und Blears fur investigation by Gehiemstaatkirchenpolizeiamt IV, Multifaith Investigatatory, Diversity in Dialogue Section.
You do understand my dear Bruther auf York what that means ja?’
Vie are also informed, dat you haf increased your Christian congregation in direct contravention of SS Ordnung 4, and refused to allow combined Islamic, devil worship services to encourage statutory interfaith worship. We are most concerned zat you stopped a service in York Cathedral just as a virgin was about to be ritually slaughtered on the altar besides an upside down cross!
How in der name of Allah is zis going to assist interfaith dialogue, tolerance, understanding und diversity in der multifaith community? Und when der Satanichser beings dematerilised you called in der Parish Excorcist!
Mein phone has never stopped ringing mit complaints from our Pagan friends and their Demonic colleagues. As you know I am in der process of negotiating the sale of mein soul und acquiring 72 virgins, as a part of mutual interfaith understanding. As you know we intend to hold a Mass fur Adolf Hitler next week as part of European Union Week of Forgiveness and Reconciliation! There will be readings from Mein Kamp and the Holy Quoran to encourage a feeling of Community prayer and joint action.
I hope dear Brother York in Christ. You will comply mit mein instructions ja!’
Yours in Christ!
Rowan
SS Reichkirchenfuhrer
Lambeth
General Synod
By GLT
Socialist Unity?
I've been rummaging around an amusing place called Socialist Unity, which is composed of wooly-hatted and wooly-brained people who like to protest about things, but don't want to get their hands dirty by actually doing anything. It's up to someone else to do the stuff. They just shout until it gets done.
At one of their shouting sessions in which they shouted about other people having money and not giving it to them, several shops were smashed and looted. Naturally, they didn't do it, it was 'pseudo-anarchists' (the socialist untiers are real anarchists, because they vote for and support this government. Don't ask me, it's their logic). Or maybe it was 'police provocateurs'. It can't have been any of their shouty friends because all they do is shout.
Anyway, the police rounded up a few of them and locked them away for a while. Outrage! Repression by authoritarians! Human rights! Toilets! Tea and sandwiches!.
Lois said: “I am angry and outraged at the Lords judgement, which found there was no ‘arbitrary deprivation of liberty’”. I and thousands of other peaceful anti-globalisation protesters were detained by police for nine hours, in a confined space, and without water, food or toilet facilities. To any reasonable person, this clearly amounted to a deprivation of liberty and the police action on May Day 2001 breaches European Convention on human rights”.
No tea and sandwiches? Why, it was practically Auschwitz. Nine hours? Murderers get out in less time. The police would never detain an MP for nine hours... oh wait.
“The Lords have judged the police can take such draconian action, as they deem fit, against protesters. Since 2001, we have seen the police use similar detainment tactics against other peaceful demonstrators, including against environmental protests and recently against Gaza war demonstrators.
These repressive police tactics are an attempt to intimidate protesters and the right to demonstrate.
"Huh? No, no, no, Lefties. We are not a police state. You've told us so yourselves. Repeatedly. We're just paranoid, remember? Labour isn't out to repress us all. They aren't banning demonstrations. You just have to give the police notice, so they know where to find you when it's time to round you up.
“Our fight against poverty and exploitation continues, as does our campaign to have the basic democratic rights to protest.”
They are incensed that they can't protest. Whatever happened to free speech, eh? Whatever happened to the right to protest?
You did this, Lefties. You don't like it, do you? You voted for it and you support it with your union dues. You didn't think it would apply to you, you thought it was for the dangerous far-right groups like trainspotters and tourists. Now you're getting a taste of what your beloved socialism is all about, you don't like it at all. And still you can't see that it's your ideals, your policies that are at play here. This is socialism, Lefties. This is what it's like, this is what you wanted.
The lefties are furious. So they're taking their case to Europe, where they actually think they'll get their rights back.
I shouldn't laugh, but for some reason I find I just can't stop.
Leg-Ion
At one of their shouting sessions in which they shouted about other people having money and not giving it to them, several shops were smashed and looted. Naturally, they didn't do it, it was 'pseudo-anarchists' (the socialist untiers are real anarchists, because they vote for and support this government. Don't ask me, it's their logic). Or maybe it was 'police provocateurs'. It can't have been any of their shouty friends because all they do is shout.
Anyway, the police rounded up a few of them and locked them away for a while. Outrage! Repression by authoritarians! Human rights! Toilets! Tea and sandwiches!.
Lois said: “I am angry and outraged at the Lords judgement, which found there was no ‘arbitrary deprivation of liberty’”. I and thousands of other peaceful anti-globalisation protesters were detained by police for nine hours, in a confined space, and without water, food or toilet facilities. To any reasonable person, this clearly amounted to a deprivation of liberty and the police action on May Day 2001 breaches European Convention on human rights”.
No tea and sandwiches? Why, it was practically Auschwitz. Nine hours? Murderers get out in less time. The police would never detain an MP for nine hours... oh wait.
“The Lords have judged the police can take such draconian action, as they deem fit, against protesters. Since 2001, we have seen the police use similar detainment tactics against other peaceful demonstrators, including against environmental protests and recently against Gaza war demonstrators.
These repressive police tactics are an attempt to intimidate protesters and the right to demonstrate.
"Huh? No, no, no, Lefties. We are not a police state. You've told us so yourselves. Repeatedly. We're just paranoid, remember? Labour isn't out to repress us all. They aren't banning demonstrations. You just have to give the police notice, so they know where to find you when it's time to round you up.
“Our fight against poverty and exploitation continues, as does our campaign to have the basic democratic rights to protest.”
They are incensed that they can't protest. Whatever happened to free speech, eh? Whatever happened to the right to protest?
You did this, Lefties. You don't like it, do you? You voted for it and you support it with your union dues. You didn't think it would apply to you, you thought it was for the dangerous far-right groups like trainspotters and tourists. Now you're getting a taste of what your beloved socialism is all about, you don't like it at all. And still you can't see that it's your ideals, your policies that are at play here. This is socialism, Lefties. This is what it's like, this is what you wanted.
The lefties are furious. So they're taking their case to Europe, where they actually think they'll get their rights back.
I shouldn't laugh, but for some reason I find I just can't stop.
Leg-Ion
Nothing to hide, so it's okay to hide it.
Soon, the massed ranks of the Bloated 646 will vote on whether they can hide those tedious little expenses from us. The ones we pay for but have no right to know about.
This week, I have to pay my tax bill. The one generated by a tax form on which I had to account for all my expenses with receipts and justifications. Expenses I, and nobody else, paid for.
The taxman can call me and demand an audit any time he pleases and demand proof that every paperclip, every envelope and every biro was used exclusively for business purposes. I haven't spent anyone else's money. The 646 want to be exempt from this kind of thing. They spend everyone else's money. Something odd here, perhaps?
The Libertarian party (note, I'm not a member) has urged everyone to contact their MP and ask them to vote this insanity away.
The Righteous Paul Flynn, Labour MP for some obscure corner of Newport, Wales, states that it's all in our imagination. There is no scheme to hide expenses. It's all blog hysteria and press babbling. He doesn't know which way he will vote yet or whether he'll bother at all. On what, Mr. Flynn? The non-cover-up non-change to the non-legislation that isn't being proposed?
He'll vote. I know which way he will vote.
How can I know this?
Simple. The Brown Gorgon is fully in support of this scheme and has imposed a three line whip to make sure his Children of the Night vote as instructed. So poor Mr. Flynn will be voting as he's told for a measure he doesn't believe exists. The doublethink involved here is truly breathtaking.
Well, he can count himself lucky. This is one of the few things MPs get to vote on now. Even if they have to vote as they're told, at least they get a vote, which is more than they had on Heathrow or bin tax or job adverts, all done through little paragraphs hidden in other legislation that grant the Gorgon and his coven the power to ignore Parliament. That includes you, Mr. Flynn. Yes, they don't care about your opinion either.
Some Labour MP's have said they oppose the action. Frank Field, Mark Fisher, Kate Hoey, David Winnick. I take off my hat, heavy though it is, in appreciation of the last remaining semblance of reasonable behaviour in the Labour party. If they do vote against a three line whip they'll suffer for it and they deserve respect for having that courage.
The Cameroids fare less well, with only two opposers named so far and nothing but incoherent mumblings from 'Hello Dave'. Little Clegg of the Dim Liberals has stated this action is wrong, and good for him. (Still won't vote for you, Clegg, but do give my regards to Compo).
And yet Mr. Flynn insists there is no expenses cover-up planned. The Gorgon supports it, several of his own MPs decry it, a three line whip insists he must vote for it and yet it doesn't exist.
It must be amazing to live in such a mind. Timothy Leary would turn green with envy at such a kaliedoscope of realities.
Ignorance is strength.
This week, I have to pay my tax bill. The one generated by a tax form on which I had to account for all my expenses with receipts and justifications. Expenses I, and nobody else, paid for.
The taxman can call me and demand an audit any time he pleases and demand proof that every paperclip, every envelope and every biro was used exclusively for business purposes. I haven't spent anyone else's money. The 646 want to be exempt from this kind of thing. They spend everyone else's money. Something odd here, perhaps?
The Libertarian party (note, I'm not a member) has urged everyone to contact their MP and ask them to vote this insanity away.
The Righteous Paul Flynn, Labour MP for some obscure corner of Newport, Wales, states that it's all in our imagination. There is no scheme to hide expenses. It's all blog hysteria and press babbling. He doesn't know which way he will vote yet or whether he'll bother at all. On what, Mr. Flynn? The non-cover-up non-change to the non-legislation that isn't being proposed?
He'll vote. I know which way he will vote.
How can I know this?
Simple. The Brown Gorgon is fully in support of this scheme and has imposed a three line whip to make sure his Children of the Night vote as instructed. So poor Mr. Flynn will be voting as he's told for a measure he doesn't believe exists. The doublethink involved here is truly breathtaking.
Well, he can count himself lucky. This is one of the few things MPs get to vote on now. Even if they have to vote as they're told, at least they get a vote, which is more than they had on Heathrow or bin tax or job adverts, all done through little paragraphs hidden in other legislation that grant the Gorgon and his coven the power to ignore Parliament. That includes you, Mr. Flynn. Yes, they don't care about your opinion either.
Some Labour MP's have said they oppose the action. Frank Field, Mark Fisher, Kate Hoey, David Winnick. I take off my hat, heavy though it is, in appreciation of the last remaining semblance of reasonable behaviour in the Labour party. If they do vote against a three line whip they'll suffer for it and they deserve respect for having that courage.
The Cameroids fare less well, with only two opposers named so far and nothing but incoherent mumblings from 'Hello Dave'. Little Clegg of the Dim Liberals has stated this action is wrong, and good for him. (Still won't vote for you, Clegg, but do give my regards to Compo).
And yet Mr. Flynn insists there is no expenses cover-up planned. The Gorgon supports it, several of his own MPs decry it, a three line whip insists he must vote for it and yet it doesn't exist.
It must be amazing to live in such a mind. Timothy Leary would turn green with envy at such a kaliedoscope of realities.
Ignorance is strength.
CHALLENGE TO THE LEGALITY OF SPEED CAMERAS GATHERS PACE
A serious challenge to the legality of most speeding convictions since the early 1990s is gaining momentum.
The issue concerns the process by which speed measuring devices that have come into use since July 1992 have been authorised. Since that date, the Secretary of State has no longer been empowered to approve the devices without laying a Statutory Instrument (SI) before both Houses of Parliament in each individual case. This has not been done, meaning that the evidence from these devices is not admissible in law. (1)
The ABD's traffic management adviser, Malcolm Heymer, explains, "This is not a trivial issue or an attempt to exploit a 'loophole'. The purpose of the requirement to lay a SI before Parliament is so that speed measuring devices are subject to proper scrutiny. Those authorised since 1992 include laser speed meters, some types of which have repeatedly caused concern that they can give false high readings. Had the proper procedure been followed, these devices might not have been authorised and drivers wrongly convicted."
The procedural error was discovered by Scottish community lawyer Robbie the Pict. The legal point has been argued in cases in Scotland (2) and barrister Michael Shrimpton convinced Nuneaton magistrates in June to throw out a speeding case because the laser speed meter used to provide evidence had not been properly approved. Shrimpton is also acting in a case put before Kingston magistrates (3) and there are more cases in hand in England, Scotland and Wales.
The legal point will ultimately be decided at Appeal. In the meantime, drivers who face prosecution for speeding may wish to request that their case is put on hold pending the outcome, or ask their solicitors to join forces with those involved in the existing cases. This would help force the pace and share the costs.
ABD chairman Brian Gregory remarks, "Once again we see the Government applying heavy-handed enforcement of the letter of the law while having a casual attitude to observing the law itself. If the eventual outcome is that millions of speeding convictions are found to have been unlawful, the cost of reimbursement will be massive, but it will only have itself to blame."
The issue concerns the process by which speed measuring devices that have come into use since July 1992 have been authorised. Since that date, the Secretary of State has no longer been empowered to approve the devices without laying a Statutory Instrument (SI) before both Houses of Parliament in each individual case. This has not been done, meaning that the evidence from these devices is not admissible in law. (1)
The ABD's traffic management adviser, Malcolm Heymer, explains, "This is not a trivial issue or an attempt to exploit a 'loophole'. The purpose of the requirement to lay a SI before Parliament is so that speed measuring devices are subject to proper scrutiny. Those authorised since 1992 include laser speed meters, some types of which have repeatedly caused concern that they can give false high readings. Had the proper procedure been followed, these devices might not have been authorised and drivers wrongly convicted."
The procedural error was discovered by Scottish community lawyer Robbie the Pict. The legal point has been argued in cases in Scotland (2) and barrister Michael Shrimpton convinced Nuneaton magistrates in June to throw out a speeding case because the laser speed meter used to provide evidence had not been properly approved. Shrimpton is also acting in a case put before Kingston magistrates (3) and there are more cases in hand in England, Scotland and Wales.
The legal point will ultimately be decided at Appeal. In the meantime, drivers who face prosecution for speeding may wish to request that their case is put on hold pending the outcome, or ask their solicitors to join forces with those involved in the existing cases. This would help force the pace and share the costs.
ABD chairman Brian Gregory remarks, "Once again we see the Government applying heavy-handed enforcement of the letter of the law while having a casual attitude to observing the law itself. If the eventual outcome is that millions of speeding convictions are found to have been unlawful, the cost of reimbursement will be massive, but it will only have itself to blame."
The Truth About 'Fluoride'
Why are we taking what ever the government throw at us laying down , could this be one reason ? we are told to drink 6-8 glasses of water per day !
Fluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice for tyrant rats.
See also FeedbackFluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice for tyrant rats.
First of all, it needs to be stated that the 'substance' referred to as 'Fluoride' is a misnomer - there is no such substance listed in the periodic chart of the elements, nor in the prestigious CRC handbook, nor in the sacred 'bible' of the pharmaceutical industry - the illustrious 'Merck Index'. Instead, we find a GAS called Fluorine - and from the use of this gas in various industries such as aluminum manufacturing and the nuclear industry -certain toxic byproducts are created which have 'captured' fluorine molecules. One such toxic, poisonous 'byproduct' is called sodium Fluoride - which according to the Merck Index is primarily used as rat and cockroach poison and is also the active ingredient in most toothpastes and as an "additive to drinking water". But sadly, there is much more to this sordid tale.
Did you know that sodium Fluoride is also one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin Nerve Gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUORIDE) - (Yes, folks the same Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists released on a crowded Japanese subway train!). Let me repeat: the truth the American public needs to understand is the fact that Sodium Fluoride is nothing more (or less) than a hazardous waste by-product of the nuclear and aluminum industries. In addition to being the primary ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, it is also a main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic, and psychiatric drugs as well as military NERVE GAS! Why, oh why then is it allowed to be added to the toothpastes and drinking water of the American people?
Historically, this substance was quite expensive for the worlds' premier chemical companies to dispose of - but in the 50's and 60's - Alcoa and the entire aluminum industry - with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste - SOMEHOW sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison at a 20,000% markup and then injecting it into our water supply as well as into the nation's toothpastes and dental rinse. Yes that's right folks, a 20,000% markup. Consider also that when sodium Fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical literally 'goes down the drain' and voila - the chemical industry has not only a free hazardous waste disposal system - but we have also PAID them handsomely in the process!!
Independent scientific evidence over the past 50 plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens our life span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances, and most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one neat little package. There is increasing evidence that aluminum in the brain is a causative factor in Alzheimer's Disease, and evidence points towards sodium fluoride's strong affinity to 'bond' with this dangerous aluminum (remember it is a byproduct of aluminum manufacturing) and also it has the ability to 'trick' the blood-brain barrier by imitating the hydrogen ion thus allowing this chemical access to brain tissue.
Honest scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on sodium fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda campaign have consistently been given a large dose of professional 'black-listing' and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never have received the ink they deserve in the national press. Just follow the money to find the 'control' and you will find prominent American families to be prominent 'players' in the scandal. In 1952 a slick PR campaign rammed the concept of 'fluoridation' through our Public Health departments and various dental organizations. This slick campaign was more akin to a highly emotional "beer salesman convention" instead of the objective, scientifically researched program that it should have been. It has continued in the same vein right up to the present day - and now sodium fluoride use has now become 'usual and customary'.
To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. You need to ask yourself, "Is this particular response based on EMOTIONS born of TRADITION, or is it truly unbiased and based instead on thoroughly researched objectivity?" There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific "know-it-all" emotions attached to the topic of 'sodium fluoride' usage -but I personally have yet to find even ONE objective, double blind study that even remotely links sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE. Instead, I hear and read such blather as "9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend 'fluoride' toothpaste" etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly independent (unattached to moneyed vested interest groups) scientists who've spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been hit with a surprising amount of unfair character assassinations from strong vested-interest groups who reap grand profits from the public's ignorance as well as from their illnesses. (Just follow the money!)
Do you have diabetes and/or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 11 million people are at much higher risk drinking fluoridated water because they will receive a much deadlier dose because of their need for higher than normal water consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary means in which fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is eliminated from the body. Does it not make sense that these people shouldn't drink fluoridated water at all? Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients on dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively small amounts of SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the 'fluoridated' city water supply? Will adequate warnings be given to people with weak kidneys, or will the real cause of such deaths be 'covered up' in the name of 'domestic tranquility'?
Concerning the 'practice' of putting sodium fluoride into drinking water, where did this insanity begin and WHO tried it first? From personal research, the very first occurrence of purposefully putting sodium fluoride into drinking water was in the German ghettos and in Nazi Germany's infamous prison camps. The Gestapo you see had little concern about sodium fluoride's 'supposed' effect on children's teeth; instead, their reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to STERILIZE HUMANS and force the people in their concentration camps into calm, bovine, submission. (See for reference: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" written by Joseph Borkin.) Kind of shocking isn't it folks!! Ah, but it gets even better.
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from a research chemist by the name of Charles Perkins. He writes:
"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, "The Truth about Water Fluoridation", to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. In the 1930's Hitler and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient and cost-effective light lobotomy? --- Ott].
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty."
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go to Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plans to communize the world."
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine --- any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically."
Signed: CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October,1954.
Tarn Lass
Fluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice for tyrant rats.
See also FeedbackFluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice for tyrant rats.
First of all, it needs to be stated that the 'substance' referred to as 'Fluoride' is a misnomer - there is no such substance listed in the periodic chart of the elements, nor in the prestigious CRC handbook, nor in the sacred 'bible' of the pharmaceutical industry - the illustrious 'Merck Index'. Instead, we find a GAS called Fluorine - and from the use of this gas in various industries such as aluminum manufacturing and the nuclear industry -certain toxic byproducts are created which have 'captured' fluorine molecules. One such toxic, poisonous 'byproduct' is called sodium Fluoride - which according to the Merck Index is primarily used as rat and cockroach poison and is also the active ingredient in most toothpastes and as an "additive to drinking water". But sadly, there is much more to this sordid tale.
Did you know that sodium Fluoride is also one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin Nerve Gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUORIDE) - (Yes, folks the same Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists released on a crowded Japanese subway train!). Let me repeat: the truth the American public needs to understand is the fact that Sodium Fluoride is nothing more (or less) than a hazardous waste by-product of the nuclear and aluminum industries. In addition to being the primary ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, it is also a main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic, and psychiatric drugs as well as military NERVE GAS! Why, oh why then is it allowed to be added to the toothpastes and drinking water of the American people?
Historically, this substance was quite expensive for the worlds' premier chemical companies to dispose of - but in the 50's and 60's - Alcoa and the entire aluminum industry - with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste - SOMEHOW sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison at a 20,000% markup and then injecting it into our water supply as well as into the nation's toothpastes and dental rinse. Yes that's right folks, a 20,000% markup. Consider also that when sodium Fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical literally 'goes down the drain' and voila - the chemical industry has not only a free hazardous waste disposal system - but we have also PAID them handsomely in the process!!
Independent scientific evidence over the past 50 plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens our life span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances, and most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one neat little package. There is increasing evidence that aluminum in the brain is a causative factor in Alzheimer's Disease, and evidence points towards sodium fluoride's strong affinity to 'bond' with this dangerous aluminum (remember it is a byproduct of aluminum manufacturing) and also it has the ability to 'trick' the blood-brain barrier by imitating the hydrogen ion thus allowing this chemical access to brain tissue.
Honest scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on sodium fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda campaign have consistently been given a large dose of professional 'black-listing' and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never have received the ink they deserve in the national press. Just follow the money to find the 'control' and you will find prominent American families to be prominent 'players' in the scandal. In 1952 a slick PR campaign rammed the concept of 'fluoridation' through our Public Health departments and various dental organizations. This slick campaign was more akin to a highly emotional "beer salesman convention" instead of the objective, scientifically researched program that it should have been. It has continued in the same vein right up to the present day - and now sodium fluoride use has now become 'usual and customary'.
To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. You need to ask yourself, "Is this particular response based on EMOTIONS born of TRADITION, or is it truly unbiased and based instead on thoroughly researched objectivity?" There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific "know-it-all" emotions attached to the topic of 'sodium fluoride' usage -but I personally have yet to find even ONE objective, double blind study that even remotely links sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE. Instead, I hear and read such blather as "9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend 'fluoride' toothpaste" etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly independent (unattached to moneyed vested interest groups) scientists who've spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been hit with a surprising amount of unfair character assassinations from strong vested-interest groups who reap grand profits from the public's ignorance as well as from their illnesses. (Just follow the money!)
Do you have diabetes and/or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 11 million people are at much higher risk drinking fluoridated water because they will receive a much deadlier dose because of their need for higher than normal water consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary means in which fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is eliminated from the body. Does it not make sense that these people shouldn't drink fluoridated water at all? Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients on dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively small amounts of SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the 'fluoridated' city water supply? Will adequate warnings be given to people with weak kidneys, or will the real cause of such deaths be 'covered up' in the name of 'domestic tranquility'?
Concerning the 'practice' of putting sodium fluoride into drinking water, where did this insanity begin and WHO tried it first? From personal research, the very first occurrence of purposefully putting sodium fluoride into drinking water was in the German ghettos and in Nazi Germany's infamous prison camps. The Gestapo you see had little concern about sodium fluoride's 'supposed' effect on children's teeth; instead, their reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to STERILIZE HUMANS and force the people in their concentration camps into calm, bovine, submission. (See for reference: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" written by Joseph Borkin.) Kind of shocking isn't it folks!! Ah, but it gets even better.
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from a research chemist by the name of Charles Perkins. He writes:
"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, "The Truth about Water Fluoridation", to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. In the 1930's Hitler and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient and cost-effective light lobotomy? --- Ott].
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty."
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go to Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plans to communize the world."
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine --- any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically."
Signed: CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October,1954.
Tarn Lass
Top journalist demonstrates why the BNP are more in touch with public opinion than Liebour.
Reggie Omar is a top journalist. Being a journalist and of Somali origin, one would expect him to be biased in favour of mass immigration but such is the strength of public opinion nowadays, even Mr Omar cannot hide the truth any longer.
His recent programme - Immigration: the inconvenient truth - began with Bradford writer - Richard North declaring he was a fan of the traditional gas lamp because they have a little cross bar near the top where he can visualise politicians and civil servants being hung along the side of the road for how they have brought the immigration invasion on this country without the consent of the British people. This comment is particularly sobering. Even the BNP would probably shy away from using such direct and blunt language in public. It certainly demonstrates the reality of ill feeling towards Labour politicians if professional writers are willing to say these things on TV!
During the programme, Mr Omar referred to some recent polls:
83% of all Britons feel that there is an immigration crisis.
66% of all Britons feel that their jobs are being undercut by migrant workers.
Note: The term "Briton" is actually used to define anybody currently living in the UK, not that they are British, so these will include the views of immigrants as well!
69% of Britons feel special treatment is given to migrants.
Note: These figures have been compiled by pro-multiculturalists!
But even more remarkably:
58% of IMMIGRANTS feel there is an immigration crisis!
40% of IMMIGRANTS feel second and third generation immigrants are given special treatment!
66% of IMMIGRANTS feel that immigration should be restricted or stopped!
Martin Hancock a social worker instantly demolished the Labour Lie that immigrants don't jump the housing queue. He said British families were upset when they say immigrants jumping the housing queue and that's why British people are voting for the BNP. Obviously, he must be confident in what he is saying if he wants to keep his job!
In conclusion, ask yourself this: Who is most representative of public opinion? Liebour or the BNP?
Who are the real fascists? Those that uphold public opinion or those that disregard it?
Mark Kaye
His recent programme - Immigration: the inconvenient truth - began with Bradford writer - Richard North declaring he was a fan of the traditional gas lamp because they have a little cross bar near the top where he can visualise politicians and civil servants being hung along the side of the road for how they have brought the immigration invasion on this country without the consent of the British people. This comment is particularly sobering. Even the BNP would probably shy away from using such direct and blunt language in public. It certainly demonstrates the reality of ill feeling towards Labour politicians if professional writers are willing to say these things on TV!
During the programme, Mr Omar referred to some recent polls:
83% of all Britons feel that there is an immigration crisis.
66% of all Britons feel that their jobs are being undercut by migrant workers.
Note: The term "Briton" is actually used to define anybody currently living in the UK, not that they are British, so these will include the views of immigrants as well!
69% of Britons feel special treatment is given to migrants.
Note: These figures have been compiled by pro-multiculturalists!
But even more remarkably:
58% of IMMIGRANTS feel there is an immigration crisis!
40% of IMMIGRANTS feel second and third generation immigrants are given special treatment!
66% of IMMIGRANTS feel that immigration should be restricted or stopped!
Martin Hancock a social worker instantly demolished the Labour Lie that immigrants don't jump the housing queue. He said British families were upset when they say immigrants jumping the housing queue and that's why British people are voting for the BNP. Obviously, he must be confident in what he is saying if he wants to keep his job!
In conclusion, ask yourself this: Who is most representative of public opinion? Liebour or the BNP?
Who are the real fascists? Those that uphold public opinion or those that disregard it?
Mark Kaye
The Guilty - Another great article from Paul Harris
.
As the proportion of third world immigrants and their descendents increases to become the majority of the population in Britain, the resulting problems will become so severe as to be undeniable, even by the most myopic self-deluded left wing intellectual sitting in his ivory tower. At some point the remaining indigenous British people who will have to live with these problems day after day will say to themselves “why was this done to us? – why was a civilised, orderly, prosperous, and relatively crime free society transformed into a chaotic, dismal hell-hole with rampant serious crime dominated by the backward medieval religion of Islam and vicious non-white criminal gangs"? The fantasy of a happy and harmonious multicultural society, which even today is being closely questioned, will by then be blatantly exposed as a pure and evil lie. The people will say to themselves “who brought this disastrous situation upon us"?
Unfortunately for the Establishment politicians and left wing zealots of the twentieth and twenty first century, there will be no hiding place and no excuses. They will not be able to say “we had no alternative, there was no option and we had to allow mass immigration”. They won’t be able to say “we didn’t realise that this would happen".
There have been right wing parties and politicians trying to warn the British people of the consequences since immigration from the third world began 60 years ago. Many books have been published over the years. And now with the internet there is a multiplicity of websites trying to alert the British people and the Western world to the impending disaster. Also throughout this period there has been several right wing political parties earnestly offering an alternative agenda. Do the Establishment politicians of today think that they will not be held accountable for their legacy to these future generations? Will their reputations remain wholesome and untarnished?
NOT A CHANCE OF IT!
People in fifty or sixty years time will still have access to the same right wing anti-immigration books that are available today, and to websites such as this one and they will say “why oh why were these people not listened to (that’s us in the BNP) - why did the British Establishment do their utmost to suppress their ideas - why couldn’t they see that they were so obviously right?” Then they will look closely at who the politicians were who imposed this dysfunctional society upon them – that’s our mainstream Establishment politicians of today. These politicians who grew up in the calm, orderly and civilised society created by the indigenous British people and bequeathed upon their descendents a chaotic, strife torn, basket case society composed of a jumble of incompatible people from every corner of the globe. You can be sure that the memory of these politicians will be hated and reviled with a vengeance.
So here is a message to these people who may be reading this article in the year 2060. Listed below are a few of the people who have brought this disaster upon you. Here are some of the people that you should be directing your hatred at. Spit on their graves because they were cowards and they were scum.
Margaret Thatcher (Prime Minister)
John Major (Prime Minister)
Tony Blair (Prime Minister)
Gordon Brown (Prime Minister)
Ken Livingstone (London Mayor)
Steve Houghton (Barnsley Labour Leader).
Unfortunately for the Establishment politicians and left wing zealots of the twentieth and twenty first century, there will be no hiding place and no excuses. They will not be able to say “we had no alternative, there was no option and we had to allow mass immigration”. They won’t be able to say “we didn’t realise that this would happen".
There have been right wing parties and politicians trying to warn the British people of the consequences since immigration from the third world began 60 years ago. Many books have been published over the years. And now with the internet there is a multiplicity of websites trying to alert the British people and the Western world to the impending disaster. Also throughout this period there has been several right wing political parties earnestly offering an alternative agenda. Do the Establishment politicians of today think that they will not be held accountable for their legacy to these future generations? Will their reputations remain wholesome and untarnished?
NOT A CHANCE OF IT!
People in fifty or sixty years time will still have access to the same right wing anti-immigration books that are available today, and to websites such as this one and they will say “why oh why were these people not listened to (that’s us in the BNP) - why did the British Establishment do their utmost to suppress their ideas - why couldn’t they see that they were so obviously right?” Then they will look closely at who the politicians were who imposed this dysfunctional society upon them – that’s our mainstream Establishment politicians of today. These politicians who grew up in the calm, orderly and civilised society created by the indigenous British people and bequeathed upon their descendents a chaotic, strife torn, basket case society composed of a jumble of incompatible people from every corner of the globe. You can be sure that the memory of these politicians will be hated and reviled with a vengeance.
So here is a message to these people who may be reading this article in the year 2060. Listed below are a few of the people who have brought this disaster upon you. Here are some of the people that you should be directing your hatred at. Spit on their graves because they were cowards and they were scum.
Margaret Thatcher (Prime Minister)
John Major (Prime Minister)
Tony Blair (Prime Minister)
Gordon Brown (Prime Minister)
Ken Livingstone (London Mayor)
Steve Houghton (Barnsley Labour Leader).
Whites Need Not Apply
Why should you support Labour when Labour does not support you?
Before Labour's racist anti-white labour laws, the best person for the job would
have got it.
These days, if you happen to be the wrong colour, you won't even get an interview.
What better proof do you need, that it is Labour who are the genuine racists?
What better excuse do you need to get out there and fight for your own rights for a change, by supporting and voting for the BNP?
Before Labour's racist anti-white labour laws, the best person for the job would
have got it.
These days, if you happen to be the wrong colour, you won't even get an interview.
What better proof do you need, that it is Labour who are the genuine racists?
What better excuse do you need to get out there and fight for your own rights for a change, by supporting and voting for the BNP?
2010 - A must read!!
This is an article about databases, (dozens of them), ID cards, surveillance, rights, liberty and social conditioning through state sponsored propaganda. It all comes together in 2010.
Imagine for a moment, that both the Government (NuLab) and the main opposition parties were all working together to the same ends, with either tacit support or complicity on the march towards 2010, because we don't see any official opposition to it.
Lets look at some evidence to support that theory. I want to make clear at this point that in quoting senior Nazi's in this article, is not to suggest that Brown's government is forming a Nazi government, but to show that he is using the same methods and tactics employed by 1930's Germany in order to achieve his goals.
In the modern context, if we begin from the basis that the War on Terror* is the Big Lie.
Then the continual news media bombardment for 10 years of the terror threat, high profile media frenzy arrests, spurious ministerial announcements, Home Office and Police leaks to the press, demonisation of young Muslims in much the same way that Stalin and Hitler used the lie of external enemies to secure their totalitarian regimes, we see that everything that has happened by way of legislation over the past 10 years has supposedly been driven by that lie. Big Lie is a propaganda technique in which the lie is so complex that the public will either dismiss it as impossible or choose not to believe it out of wilful ignorance. It was defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".
Indeed, the American Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler's psychological profile said: His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
If you believe as I do that this perfectly sums up UK Government over the past 10 years, then read on.
26,000 new laws, 3000 new criminal offences to stop what has been at best a very sporadic ineffective onslaught of terrorism in the UK. Virtually none of these new laws have been opposed during their passage through parliament. One can only therefore assume a degree of collusion in their passing through the house, as I cannot believe that opposition MP's were unaware of their content, implied and actual denial of freedoms and rights, nor struggled for any input into ensuring that many of the more draconian laws had safeguards built in to ensure they were never misused.
It is true that during this period, the Government have enjoyed a majority in Parliament, but that does not defer from my thoughts of collusion. Indeed it was a Tory ex whip who introduced the most damming legislation to silence those who want to know what is happening with his Freedom of Information amendment bill.
In order to maintain the lie, not only do you need to keep repeating it, but you also need to offer carrots from time to time, to ensure that the population believes that you are actually working for their benefit.
One of those smoke and mirror exercises was the expendable introduction of the Regional Assemblies throughout England. Although initially opposed, and in the pilot areas voted down, they were implemented at huge cost anyway, knowing that this would attract a good deal of public opposition, including token opposition from the Tories and Liberals. Finally you give the public what it wants by abolishing them, only to give the powers to the unelected RDA's, which had been set up quietly in the background. Joe Public never having been told about RDA's, they not getting any state approved media coverage, doesn't see them as a waste or unnecessary regulation body in the same way as the Regional Assemblies, and being satisfied that the Assemblies are now gone, doesn't realise that the powers that they wielded have not.
The carefully controlled media highlighted the abolition of the RA's, but gave little or no coverage to the RDA's.Smoke and Mirrors, job done.We have seen for a whole raft of Government projects with initial explanations and justifications, changes to those as campaigns were launched, changes again to suit the stories of the day, as the costs keep mounting and the juggernaut keeps rolling on.One of the largest of these projects is ID Cards. Again, this is a smoke and mirror exercise.
This project has attracted a good deal of public opposition, but so far we have only token political opposition from the Tories, who have promised to scrap the cards, and none from the Liberals. We unfortunately have not seen the same commitment for the underlying databases. In keeping with the Big Lie process, ID Cards are attracting a lot of interest. The costs keep mounting, the technology is unproven, the orders have not yet been placed. These are the headlines, but in the background lots of work has been going on, with the databases, but not the big single big brother database, something much worse, little brothers. The huge databases at the DWP, the DVLA and HMRC are to be linked to form the NIR, the National Identity Register. This is why the Gateway reviews on the ID Card project, and others, were ordered destroyed by the Treasury, and this is why the majority of the contractors working for the IT Consulting groups working on these projects are from the Indian sub continent. With the large part of the work now done, the rules for the Highly Skilled Migrant programme that brought those contractors here are now being changed, to force them home again. The Treasury and Gordon Brown need to hide the secretive nature of the work being undertaken until 2010.
The Cards themselves are expendable, just as the Regional Assemblies were, something to attract public opposition, backed by the token political opposition, but they are just the front end, they are politically expendable, thereby giving something back to the public when they are scrapped.Understand that it not the cards themselves that matter to this government, but the ability to gather, collate and use information. Information about you, your families, your possessions and income, in fact everything about your life, now and in the past. Information as any ex Stasi or KGB man will tell you, is power.
It will become apparent a little later why ID Cards are a smoke and mirror exercise.
In the years 2009 and 2010 all the major government IT projects will see the completion of some, and limited roll out of others but they all come together in 2010.
The ID cards 2009, (will come back to this)
The National Identity Register 2010,
Immigration Passport Service interrogation centres 2009,
The upgraded National DNA Database 2010,
The upgraded National Fingerprint Database 2009,
The Children's Fingerprint Database 2009,
The upgraded Police National Computer 2009,
All e-Passports 2009,
The National Number Plate Recognition System project 2009,
Employment systems 2009,
The enhanced Police National Computer/Interpol link system 2009,
MI5's Scope project 2010,
The Home Office C-Nomis project 2009,
The Children's Register Contactpoint 2009,
Imagine for a moment, that both the Government (NuLab) and the main opposition parties were all working together to the same ends, with either tacit support or complicity on the march towards 2010, because we don't see any official opposition to it.
Lets look at some evidence to support that theory. I want to make clear at this point that in quoting senior Nazi's in this article, is not to suggest that Brown's government is forming a Nazi government, but to show that he is using the same methods and tactics employed by 1930's Germany in order to achieve his goals.
In the modern context, if we begin from the basis that the War on Terror* is the Big Lie.
Then the continual news media bombardment for 10 years of the terror threat, high profile media frenzy arrests, spurious ministerial announcements, Home Office and Police leaks to the press, demonisation of young Muslims in much the same way that Stalin and Hitler used the lie of external enemies to secure their totalitarian regimes, we see that everything that has happened by way of legislation over the past 10 years has supposedly been driven by that lie. Big Lie is a propaganda technique in which the lie is so complex that the public will either dismiss it as impossible or choose not to believe it out of wilful ignorance. It was defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".
Indeed, the American Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler's psychological profile said: His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
If you believe as I do that this perfectly sums up UK Government over the past 10 years, then read on.
26,000 new laws, 3000 new criminal offences to stop what has been at best a very sporadic ineffective onslaught of terrorism in the UK. Virtually none of these new laws have been opposed during their passage through parliament. One can only therefore assume a degree of collusion in their passing through the house, as I cannot believe that opposition MP's were unaware of their content, implied and actual denial of freedoms and rights, nor struggled for any input into ensuring that many of the more draconian laws had safeguards built in to ensure they were never misused.
It is true that during this period, the Government have enjoyed a majority in Parliament, but that does not defer from my thoughts of collusion. Indeed it was a Tory ex whip who introduced the most damming legislation to silence those who want to know what is happening with his Freedom of Information amendment bill.
In order to maintain the lie, not only do you need to keep repeating it, but you also need to offer carrots from time to time, to ensure that the population believes that you are actually working for their benefit.
One of those smoke and mirror exercises was the expendable introduction of the Regional Assemblies throughout England. Although initially opposed, and in the pilot areas voted down, they were implemented at huge cost anyway, knowing that this would attract a good deal of public opposition, including token opposition from the Tories and Liberals. Finally you give the public what it wants by abolishing them, only to give the powers to the unelected RDA's, which had been set up quietly in the background. Joe Public never having been told about RDA's, they not getting any state approved media coverage, doesn't see them as a waste or unnecessary regulation body in the same way as the Regional Assemblies, and being satisfied that the Assemblies are now gone, doesn't realise that the powers that they wielded have not.
The carefully controlled media highlighted the abolition of the RA's, but gave little or no coverage to the RDA's.Smoke and Mirrors, job done.We have seen for a whole raft of Government projects with initial explanations and justifications, changes to those as campaigns were launched, changes again to suit the stories of the day, as the costs keep mounting and the juggernaut keeps rolling on.One of the largest of these projects is ID Cards. Again, this is a smoke and mirror exercise.
This project has attracted a good deal of public opposition, but so far we have only token political opposition from the Tories, who have promised to scrap the cards, and none from the Liberals. We unfortunately have not seen the same commitment for the underlying databases. In keeping with the Big Lie process, ID Cards are attracting a lot of interest. The costs keep mounting, the technology is unproven, the orders have not yet been placed. These are the headlines, but in the background lots of work has been going on, with the databases, but not the big single big brother database, something much worse, little brothers. The huge databases at the DWP, the DVLA and HMRC are to be linked to form the NIR, the National Identity Register. This is why the Gateway reviews on the ID Card project, and others, were ordered destroyed by the Treasury, and this is why the majority of the contractors working for the IT Consulting groups working on these projects are from the Indian sub continent. With the large part of the work now done, the rules for the Highly Skilled Migrant programme that brought those contractors here are now being changed, to force them home again. The Treasury and Gordon Brown need to hide the secretive nature of the work being undertaken until 2010.
The Cards themselves are expendable, just as the Regional Assemblies were, something to attract public opposition, backed by the token political opposition, but they are just the front end, they are politically expendable, thereby giving something back to the public when they are scrapped.Understand that it not the cards themselves that matter to this government, but the ability to gather, collate and use information. Information about you, your families, your possessions and income, in fact everything about your life, now and in the past. Information as any ex Stasi or KGB man will tell you, is power.
It will become apparent a little later why ID Cards are a smoke and mirror exercise.
In the years 2009 and 2010 all the major government IT projects will see the completion of some, and limited roll out of others but they all come together in 2010.
The ID cards 2009, (will come back to this)
The National Identity Register 2010,
Immigration Passport Service interrogation centres 2009,
The upgraded National DNA Database 2010,
The upgraded National Fingerprint Database 2009,
The Children's Fingerprint Database 2009,
The upgraded Police National Computer 2009,
All e-Passports 2009,
The National Number Plate Recognition System project 2009,
Employment systems 2009,
The enhanced Police National Computer/Interpol link system 2009,
MI5's Scope project 2010,
The Home Office C-Nomis project 2009,
The Children's Register Contactpoint 2009,
Terminal 5 at Heathrow 2009,
Phase II Home Information PackS 2010,
The e-borders system 2009,
The DWP Customer Information system 2009,
The NHS NPfIT 2010,
The European SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project 2009/2010
and many more unnamed or secret projects
This all happens at the same time as the final ratification of the European Constitution 2009, just before the European Parliament Elections 2009
Changes to the law to allow data sharing have made it possible for it all to come together in 2009/2010 to become one huge interactive database system. In 2010 it also joins up with the European systems.
Government have consistently argued their case that these system are necessary to fight crime, or terrorism, your right to employment and health care etc, and that the data will only be used for the initial purpose it is collected for, would never be shared, and that data one one system can never be used elsewhere.
On a one project at a time basis its easy to argue the lie, link them all together it is not so easy, and its use becomes much clearer. By linking these databases government now have a profile of you. Where you work, how much you earn, tax you pay, where you travel, how you travel, when you get sick, which doctor or hospital you use, what medication you receive, in short, what you cost to run vs what you earn for the state.
A modern day Europe wide electronic 'Doomsday Book'.
All the trappings of a totalitarian state.As Dizzy quite rightly elaborates:
What's important to point out here is this is not about saying you think Gordon Brown and the Labour Government are secretly trying to enslave us all in an Orwellian nightmare with the ultimate aim of destroying democracy. No, this is about asking whether the proposal passes the Stalin Test. Would someone like Stalin have found a system like this useful?
Just because today's politicians are not, or at least appear not to be, maniacal megalomaniacs, it does not mean that there won't be one in the future, and frankly it is naive to think that it can't happen. This means we should be exceptionally careful when we build the infrastructure of state that could so be easily used for purposes of political oppression.
And as one commenter in the Times stated:
I wondered how such gross authoritarian abuses could be coming about in modern Britain but then I looked up my MP. Lo and behold it turns out she received a Scottish West coast Catholic education, became a teacher and is now a minister in the Department of Work & Pensions. I particularly note that her 'other interests' include studying the social system of the former East Germany. Suddenly it all becomes depressingly clear. Jim, Cumbernauld.
Now I come back to the ID cards, the smoke and mirrors that this government is planning to employ. YES, they will scrap them, but only as they are presented to us now, so the anti card campaigns will wither and die on the vine, the Tories will be cock a hoop and say we won the argument for you.
Now look at your bank and credit cards. Then look at your families cards, and your friends and colleagues cards. They all expire in 2009 or 2010.
Government problems with the ID cards as presented are well documented, with their lack of expertise, so who better to issue and administer an ID card system for government, than the Banks.
When your bank and credit cards expire, in order to get new ones, or in fact any banking or financial services, you must first be on all the relevant databases or you will be denied the use of both government and financial services throughout Europe. The European SEPA project is looking for total harmonisation of electronic banking throughout Europe by 2010, but in the UK bank and bank issued credit cards will also double up as your ID Card. This had been agreed between banks and Treasury as far back as 2004, in conjunction with the National Smart Cards Project. (very quiet and low key)
When the new cards are introduced you won't be able to buy, rent or sell a house; buy, sell or lease a car; open a bank account or draw over £99 in cash from one; obtain a telephone landline, mobile phone or internet connection, visit a doctor, a hospital or buy anything at a pharmacy; or obtain a passport, without first obtaining permission via the ID card element.
You won't be able to get a job, temporary or permanent, as employers will demand them as they have to prove they are only employing eligible people, without first obtaining permission via the ID card element..
Further, the Home Secretary will be able to suspend or revoke your ID card whenever, for whatever reason, without any judicial oversight or right to appeal. It will become your provisional licence to live in the U.K., whether native or alien, which could be taken away at any time.
The consequences of this are clear. No bank card = no ID Card. No ID Card means no banking, no work, no benefits, no nothing.
That means you cannot pay bills, or your mortgage, run your car or travel. (the first iteration is being field tested now)
The number of debts that will mount as a result will be horrific. Government have already changed the law to allow debt collectors right of entry into your home without court orders.
The number of repossessions will rise dramatically as mortgages default, again the laws have been changed to make it easier to repossess, and as the number of dispossessed people rises, crime will also rise (which is why they wanted the cards and databases), so the numerous laws and new criminal offences are already in place to tackle that.
If the numbers and public anger gets out of hand, and people organise and riot, the laws are already in place for that too, with SOCA being able to act outside of judicial oversight, especially if rioters are reclassified as social terrorists, which is why they have been pushing for the 90 days internment so strongly. The new EU paramilitary police force European Gendarmerie Force (EGF) could also be used.
HIPS was introduced to ensure that there would be a database of all the homes in the UK. In order to buy loyalty, just as Hitler and Stalin did, giving repossessed homes to loyal party workers fulfilled their needs.
We were warned many years ago that the peoples of the western world would soon be herded, chipped and classified, and that it would all be run by governments and the banks. As part of the Big Lie it has always been fobbed off as conspiracy theory, a joke, ideas of the nutters. Somehow it doesn't seem so stupid now.
Now we have proof that credit cards are to be used for people tracking.
Those 26,000 new laws were never aimed at terrorists, they are aimed at you.!!
And don't expect the Tories or Liberals to help us out of this. Instead, ask the question why so many opposition front bencher's have got second jobs, most with financial institutions and banks.
But, I hear you cry, I haven't seen that on the telly. Would you honestly expect them to tell you that you are about to lose everything by using the biggest lie in the world, along with the distraction of the Global Warming scam.
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”- Joseph Goebbels
The other vital part of the Big Lie, the key component, was to ensure that the military was kept fully occupied, at full stretch and out of the UK during the entire time that this lie was being perpetrated.
So 2010 is the date that everything is coming together, and if you were thinking of getting out, moving to sunnier climes, think again because this not just happening in the UK, but also in Brussels, (strangely this database is now almost devoid of the hundreds of working papers that populated it only 3 months ago) in Paris, (French entry missing) Berlin,(Germany's ID Card documentation is also missing), Rome, (and Italy and Belgium) Strasbourg, in Washington, in Montreal, in Delhi, Canberra and Tokyo.
They are all working together towards a brave new world, beginning in 2010.
Same time as the North American Union or Mexamericanada
http://www.thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/
Phase II Home Information PackS 2010,
The e-borders system 2009,
The DWP Customer Information system 2009,
The NHS NPfIT 2010,
The European SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project 2009/2010
and many more unnamed or secret projects
This all happens at the same time as the final ratification of the European Constitution 2009, just before the European Parliament Elections 2009
Changes to the law to allow data sharing have made it possible for it all to come together in 2009/2010 to become one huge interactive database system. In 2010 it also joins up with the European systems.
Government have consistently argued their case that these system are necessary to fight crime, or terrorism, your right to employment and health care etc, and that the data will only be used for the initial purpose it is collected for, would never be shared, and that data one one system can never be used elsewhere.
On a one project at a time basis its easy to argue the lie, link them all together it is not so easy, and its use becomes much clearer. By linking these databases government now have a profile of you. Where you work, how much you earn, tax you pay, where you travel, how you travel, when you get sick, which doctor or hospital you use, what medication you receive, in short, what you cost to run vs what you earn for the state.
A modern day Europe wide electronic 'Doomsday Book'.
All the trappings of a totalitarian state.As Dizzy quite rightly elaborates:
What's important to point out here is this is not about saying you think Gordon Brown and the Labour Government are secretly trying to enslave us all in an Orwellian nightmare with the ultimate aim of destroying democracy. No, this is about asking whether the proposal passes the Stalin Test. Would someone like Stalin have found a system like this useful?
Just because today's politicians are not, or at least appear not to be, maniacal megalomaniacs, it does not mean that there won't be one in the future, and frankly it is naive to think that it can't happen. This means we should be exceptionally careful when we build the infrastructure of state that could so be easily used for purposes of political oppression.
And as one commenter in the Times stated:
I wondered how such gross authoritarian abuses could be coming about in modern Britain but then I looked up my MP. Lo and behold it turns out she received a Scottish West coast Catholic education, became a teacher and is now a minister in the Department of Work & Pensions. I particularly note that her 'other interests' include studying the social system of the former East Germany. Suddenly it all becomes depressingly clear. Jim, Cumbernauld.
Now I come back to the ID cards, the smoke and mirrors that this government is planning to employ. YES, they will scrap them, but only as they are presented to us now, so the anti card campaigns will wither and die on the vine, the Tories will be cock a hoop and say we won the argument for you.
Now look at your bank and credit cards. Then look at your families cards, and your friends and colleagues cards. They all expire in 2009 or 2010.
Government problems with the ID cards as presented are well documented, with their lack of expertise, so who better to issue and administer an ID card system for government, than the Banks.
When your bank and credit cards expire, in order to get new ones, or in fact any banking or financial services, you must first be on all the relevant databases or you will be denied the use of both government and financial services throughout Europe. The European SEPA project is looking for total harmonisation of electronic banking throughout Europe by 2010, but in the UK bank and bank issued credit cards will also double up as your ID Card. This had been agreed between banks and Treasury as far back as 2004, in conjunction with the National Smart Cards Project. (very quiet and low key)
When the new cards are introduced you won't be able to buy, rent or sell a house; buy, sell or lease a car; open a bank account or draw over £99 in cash from one; obtain a telephone landline, mobile phone or internet connection, visit a doctor, a hospital or buy anything at a pharmacy; or obtain a passport, without first obtaining permission via the ID card element.
You won't be able to get a job, temporary or permanent, as employers will demand them as they have to prove they are only employing eligible people, without first obtaining permission via the ID card element..
Further, the Home Secretary will be able to suspend or revoke your ID card whenever, for whatever reason, without any judicial oversight or right to appeal. It will become your provisional licence to live in the U.K., whether native or alien, which could be taken away at any time.
The consequences of this are clear. No bank card = no ID Card. No ID Card means no banking, no work, no benefits, no nothing.
That means you cannot pay bills, or your mortgage, run your car or travel. (the first iteration is being field tested now)
The number of debts that will mount as a result will be horrific. Government have already changed the law to allow debt collectors right of entry into your home without court orders.
The number of repossessions will rise dramatically as mortgages default, again the laws have been changed to make it easier to repossess, and as the number of dispossessed people rises, crime will also rise (which is why they wanted the cards and databases), so the numerous laws and new criminal offences are already in place to tackle that.
If the numbers and public anger gets out of hand, and people organise and riot, the laws are already in place for that too, with SOCA being able to act outside of judicial oversight, especially if rioters are reclassified as social terrorists, which is why they have been pushing for the 90 days internment so strongly. The new EU paramilitary police force European Gendarmerie Force (EGF) could also be used.
HIPS was introduced to ensure that there would be a database of all the homes in the UK. In order to buy loyalty, just as Hitler and Stalin did, giving repossessed homes to loyal party workers fulfilled their needs.
We were warned many years ago that the peoples of the western world would soon be herded, chipped and classified, and that it would all be run by governments and the banks. As part of the Big Lie it has always been fobbed off as conspiracy theory, a joke, ideas of the nutters. Somehow it doesn't seem so stupid now.
Now we have proof that credit cards are to be used for people tracking.
Those 26,000 new laws were never aimed at terrorists, they are aimed at you.!!
And don't expect the Tories or Liberals to help us out of this. Instead, ask the question why so many opposition front bencher's have got second jobs, most with financial institutions and banks.
But, I hear you cry, I haven't seen that on the telly. Would you honestly expect them to tell you that you are about to lose everything by using the biggest lie in the world, along with the distraction of the Global Warming scam.
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”- Joseph Goebbels
The other vital part of the Big Lie, the key component, was to ensure that the military was kept fully occupied, at full stretch and out of the UK during the entire time that this lie was being perpetrated.
So 2010 is the date that everything is coming together, and if you were thinking of getting out, moving to sunnier climes, think again because this not just happening in the UK, but also in Brussels, (strangely this database is now almost devoid of the hundreds of working papers that populated it only 3 months ago) in Paris, (French entry missing) Berlin,(Germany's ID Card documentation is also missing), Rome, (and Italy and Belgium) Strasbourg, in Washington, in Montreal, in Delhi, Canberra and Tokyo.
They are all working together towards a brave new world, beginning in 2010.
Same time as the North American Union or Mexamericanada
http://www.thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/
How the hell did we get into this mess?
The Observer picks up on the latest developments in the situation in Italy - not a happy picture, where there has been a vicious attack on Romanians by masked Italians.Over in the Independent on Sunday we get a picture of the effect of mass immigration on the Lincolnshire town of Boston. Again it is not a happy picture – a town no longer at ease with itself.
Meanwhile, The Times takes up the issue of the number of immigrant workers in the UK, offering revised statistics which suggest that not 52 percent but more than 80 percent of the jobs created in the past 10 years have gone to foreigners.
The figures also show that in the past five years the number of foreigners in work in Britain has risen by nearly one million, while employment among the UK-born population has dropped by almost 500,000.
The number of foreign-born workers in Britain rose from 1.904 million in mid-1997 to 3.269 million in the middle of this year, an increase of 1.365 million. Over the same period, there was a rise in working-age employment among UK-born people from 23.638 million to 23.948 million, a rise of just 310,000. Since 2002 the number of foreigners working in Britain has climbed by 964,000 while UK-born employment has dropped by 478,000.In a leader that mirrors my co-editor's piece, however, the paper's leader notes that the willingness of employers to take on foreign labour is a reflection of our dire education system.
This has produced an "underclass", where a conservatively estimated 10 percent of young people are "Neets": not in education, employment or training. "Faced with the choice between an unreliable, unskilled and unqualified British 17-year-old and an enthusiastic and skilled eastern European, probably speaking better English, whom would you employ?" the paper asks. We have created a "lost generation" of young people.
How the hell did we get into this mess?
Veronica
Convert to Christianity and Guarantee your asylum!
This is yet another classic example why nobody believes Labour and their claims that they are successfully deporting bogus asylum seekers.
Apparently this latest specimen from Iran escaped police custody, so we can safely assume he has some kind of criminal record - for what, is not exactly clear but the press silence over this makes it look all the more suspicious.
Yes another criminal is just the type of "enrichment" that we Barnsley folk need!
Wait for it...
That's why they have both decided to have their photos taken and their stories covered, including where they reside published in the press for the entire world to see!
Local Labour MP Eric Illsley is disregarding the professional judgements of immigration officials and thinks their stories are credible!
Apparently this latest specimen from Iran escaped police custody, so we can safely assume he has some kind of criminal record - for what, is not exactly clear but the press silence over this makes it look all the more suspicious.
Yes another criminal is just the type of "enrichment" that we Barnsley folk need!
Another point of interest is that he also worked for LBD bakeries until he was made redundant - this despite the fact that asylum seekers have no right to work here until they are granted asylum! Again note: Labour's tough stance on clamping down on the employment of illegals by doing nothing!
Now he has met a girl, his girlfriend however is really worried about other Muslims finding out that he has converted to Christianity in case he gets killed, so now he cannot go back to where he came from.
Yes...
Now he has met a girl, his girlfriend however is really worried about other Muslims finding out that he has converted to Christianity in case he gets killed, so now he cannot go back to where he came from.
Yes...
Wait for it...
That's why they have both decided to have their photos taken and their stories covered, including where they reside published in the press for the entire world to see!
Local Labour MP Eric Illsley is disregarding the professional judgements of immigration officials and thinks their stories are credible!
Click image to enlarge..
Latest job cuts at "Hidiously White" Al Beeb
Another great article from Mark Kaye
Whilst I don't usually revel in folks loosing their jobs, I couldn't help raise the corners of my mouth when I saw the front page of the Daily Mail last night. The "Hideously White" BBC, as former director general Gregg Dyke described it, is set to close the Television Centre and axe yet more jobs because it arrogantly thought the government were going to raise the licence fee more than it did. In true Beeb style, the Beeb now claims it will have to put on even more repeats and further reduce the number of factual documentaries, this in spite of the fact that it blows most of the loot it collects from the licence payer on providing multilingual programs for other countries at our expense! Of course if you are like me and don't have a TV licence, preferring instead, to make other arrangements for my visual entertainment such as joining a video club and playing pre-recorded media through a DVD player that has no capacity to receive TV signals, then the prospect of even more celebrity TV crap doesn't really bother me one iota!.
This institution has been instrumental in brainwashing our once proud and civilised society in the 1950's, prepared to fight to the death to protect our civil liberties, to a nation of snivelling wretches, too scared to make a "politically incorrect" comment and who are more interested in being glued to tripe TV like as EastEnders and Embarrassing Illnesses than they are in taking an interest in the reality of what is happening outside their own front door.
Why should the Beeb be propped up by the licence fee? Why should they be allowed to deny non licence payers the right to receive independent television in the digital age of choice? It is about time they were made to compete on an equal footing with all the other media and if more and more people pulled the plug on the Beeb like I did two years ago, if only for a few months, then our nation would be rid of this poisoned chalice for ever!
Mark Kaye
Whilst I don't usually revel in folks loosing their jobs, I couldn't help raise the corners of my mouth when I saw the front page of the Daily Mail last night. The "Hideously White" BBC, as former director general Gregg Dyke described it, is set to close the Television Centre and axe yet more jobs because it arrogantly thought the government were going to raise the licence fee more than it did. In true Beeb style, the Beeb now claims it will have to put on even more repeats and further reduce the number of factual documentaries, this in spite of the fact that it blows most of the loot it collects from the licence payer on providing multilingual programs for other countries at our expense! Of course if you are like me and don't have a TV licence, preferring instead, to make other arrangements for my visual entertainment such as joining a video club and playing pre-recorded media through a DVD player that has no capacity to receive TV signals, then the prospect of even more celebrity TV crap doesn't really bother me one iota!.
This institution has been instrumental in brainwashing our once proud and civilised society in the 1950's, prepared to fight to the death to protect our civil liberties, to a nation of snivelling wretches, too scared to make a "politically incorrect" comment and who are more interested in being glued to tripe TV like as EastEnders and Embarrassing Illnesses than they are in taking an interest in the reality of what is happening outside their own front door.
Why should the Beeb be propped up by the licence fee? Why should they be allowed to deny non licence payers the right to receive independent television in the digital age of choice? It is about time they were made to compete on an equal footing with all the other media and if more and more people pulled the plug on the Beeb like I did two years ago, if only for a few months, then our nation would be rid of this poisoned chalice for ever!
Mark Kaye
Police drop in session - A COP OUT!
Barnsley police held a "drop in" session on Thursday at Barnsley District General Hospital from 2 – 5 pm. The purpose was to give the public the opportunity to feedback on current community policing practises. It does not take a marketing expert to realise the utter foolishness of this venue which is why most soap powder manufacturers have their customer surveyors mingling with shoppers on a weekend in the town centre. Why anybody would choose to attend a venue that is completely out of the way, notoriously difficult and expensive to park and at times which discriminates against working people is difficult to conceive. Wait a minute! Perhaps this is the reason! Maybe if no one turns up then maybe the bureaucratic empire builders who have replaced operational police officers can claim to have carried out a customer satisfaction exercise without having to fill in too many boxes that hopelessly embarrass their useless politically correct top brass! The top brass who have yielded without so much as protest at the police force (or service as it is known to the politically correct) being turned from a once respected institution to the useless politically correct joke that spends more of its energy persecuting honourable law abiding citizens who are sick and tired at the lack of police effectiveness in dealing with criminals than it does in actually scarring the hell out of the criminals! How frustrating this must feel for ordinary front line coppers who have to work with their hands tied behind their backs whilst following orders. THERE'S NO WONDER MOST OF THE GOOD ONES HAVE LEFT OR ARE STILL LEAVING IN DROVES! Barnsley tax payers ought to be examining their council tax bills to find out what last year's massive 5% increase bought them! The answer is a reduction of 95 uniformed police officers between 2005 and 2006 at the same time as pen pushers and bureaucrats were increased by 177! It's about time we stood up and shouted louder than the criminals for our rights for a change and its about time we gave the politically correct politicians who have inflicted this evil on our people a good kick in the teeth by making a pledge to support the only party who have the guts to reverse this degradation, the BNP and making DAMN SURE WE HONOUR THAT PLEDGE!
Mark Kaye
Mark Kaye
JIHADISTS WANT OUR KIDS - DEAD OR ALIVE!!!
The primary objective of all Muslims is to spread Islam throughout the globe by whatever means may be necessary, including lying and killing. Killing kuffars (unbelievers) who resist Islam is not a sin, in fact it is the only sure way of attaining paradise. Kuffars who do not resist must be either enslaved (dhimmis) or converted to Islam.
...
So, with the current Jihad in the West, how does this Islamic program of killing/enslavement/conversion apply to kuffar kids?
...
KILLING:
...
The first wave of attacks in the present Jihad mostly killed adults, though there were a few children incinerated on the 9/11 flights. It was only with the deliberate torturing and killing of kuffar children at Beslan that the civilised world realised that Muslims worship Allah in the same way that the abominators worshipped Moloch. In addition, many of the Beslan children were humiliated by being raped and forced to drink their own urine before being killed. Humiliation of the kuffar is very important in Islam.
...
Muslim theologians have called for the sacrifice of 2 million American children to Allah, and recent events in Scotland seem to show that children in the U.K. are also prime targets for attack. Jihadists tortured, castrated and murdered a fifteen year old , and the failed Glasgow airport attack was timed for the first day of the school holidays with the obvious intention of burning as many families as possible.
...
It is rather disconcerting to realise that this attack appears to have been carried out by doctors, especially as the Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association are on record as stating that their duty of care does not extend to kuffars.
...
In summary: a jihadist who believes that killing kuffars will get him to Allah's bordello in the sky doesn't care whether his victims are men, women or children. All kuffar human-sacrifices are equally pleasing to Allah.
...
SUBJUGATION:
...
The Islamic abduction, rape and sexual subjugation of young kuffar girls may be new to our generation with the comparatively recent cultural enrichment of our cities, but this typical Muslim practice goes back into history, and the West has suffered from it before.
...
Of course every culture produces child molesters, but in non-Muslim societies these are usually isolated loners. In contrast, Muslim paedophiles are well-organised and these predators often hunt their prey in rape-gangs in a tradition of Muslim razzia going back to the 'prophet'. The reason for this cultural difference is that paedophilia and rape are abhorrent in civilised societies, but are socially acceptable to Muslims because they are dutifully following Mohammed's example.
...
CONVERSION:
...
As well as being after our children's bodies, either as burned and mangled sacrifices to Allah or living sex-slaves, they are also determined to brainwash our children's minds with their vile cult. A favourite trick is 'role playing' to indoctrinate young children to think of themselves as Muslims.
....
In addition, there is an insidious program to destroy our children's cultural heritage , with attempts to abolish festivals loved by generations of kuffar children and put Islamic events in their place.
...
British Muslims are demanding a ban within state schools on music, dance, drama, biology, swimming and lessons about any other religion but Islam. There are also to be compulsory history lessons about the 'massive contribution that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation'. In fact, Islamic culture is so backward that Muslims are incapable of bringing anything new to the West. The West has long ago moved on from its medieval phase and few citizens of Western countries (apart from immigrant Muslims) would want to return to it. All the things that Muslims have brought to our civilisation are negative and barbaric. However, don't expect historical accuracy to stand in the way of implementing a politically correct curriculum.
....
So, unless present trends can be reversed, the only foreseeable future for our children will be death, dhimmitude or conversion.
.
UPDATE: 16th December 2008 The BNP reported THIS
.
Najistani
Socialism?
The British National Party has always faced opposition from people on the left wing of politics. These people believe in one world – all races and faiths living together in peace and harmony. However this is only their latest fixation. Before this came their obsession with the working class. They saw the working class as facing exploitation from the bosses and owners of the industries in which they worked. They saw themselves as heroes in the roll of fighting for decent wages and conditions against the cruel might of capitalism.
But now they appear to have completely dropped their support of the working class in exchange for their support of immigrants and the ethnic minorities. In fact their new position is in direct opposition to their old position. They are now on the bosses and owners side AGAINST the working class. For is it not true that the bosses and owners will readily employ an immigrant at a lower rate than a British working class person, thus undercutting the wage levels of the British worker, or even leaving him on the dole. Is it not true that the British working class is in direct competition with the immigrant and ethnic minority person for housing and employment, where the middle and upper classes are not.
This tells us something about the character of the socialist person. It tells us that the socialist is basically a weak willed person who needs to keep bolstering his own self image by casting himself in the roll of hero of the underdog. How can these people jump ships so readily and brazenly? The reason is that they are either totally dishonest or totally detached from reality.
This is in direct contrast to a member of an anti-immigration party such as the BNP. Members of the BNP absolutely must be strong willed and determined in order to stand up to the unrelenting attacks from the Establishment. They need to be firmly based in reality to justify their own beleaguered position.
Paul Harris
But now they appear to have completely dropped their support of the working class in exchange for their support of immigrants and the ethnic minorities. In fact their new position is in direct opposition to their old position. They are now on the bosses and owners side AGAINST the working class. For is it not true that the bosses and owners will readily employ an immigrant at a lower rate than a British working class person, thus undercutting the wage levels of the British worker, or even leaving him on the dole. Is it not true that the British working class is in direct competition with the immigrant and ethnic minority person for housing and employment, where the middle and upper classes are not.
This tells us something about the character of the socialist person. It tells us that the socialist is basically a weak willed person who needs to keep bolstering his own self image by casting himself in the roll of hero of the underdog. How can these people jump ships so readily and brazenly? The reason is that they are either totally dishonest or totally detached from reality.
This is in direct contrast to a member of an anti-immigration party such as the BNP. Members of the BNP absolutely must be strong willed and determined in order to stand up to the unrelenting attacks from the Establishment. They need to be firmly based in reality to justify their own beleaguered position.
Paul Harris
Noah and the Ark
In the year 2007 the Lord came unto Noah, who was now living in England
and said, "Once again, the earth has become wicked and over-populated,
and I see the end of all flesh before me. Build another Ark and save two
of every living thing along with a few good humans."
He gave Noah the CATIA drawings, saying, "You have 6 months to build the
Ark before I will start the unending rain for 40 days and 40 nights."
Six months later, the Lord looked down and saw Noah weeping in his yard
but no Ark. Noah!" He roared, "I'm about to start the rain! Where is the
Ark?"
"Forgive me, Lord," begged Noah, "but things have changed.
I needed Building Regulations Approval and I've been arguing with the
Fire Brigade about the need for a sprinkler system.
My neighbours claim that I should have obtained planning permission for
building the Ark in my garden because it is development of the site,
even though in my view it is a temporary structure.
We had to then go to appeal to the Secretary of State for a decision.
Then the Department of Transport demanded a bond be posted for the
future costs of moving power lines and other overhead obstructions to
clear the passage for the Ark 's move to the sea. I told them that the
sea would be coming to us, but they would hear nothing of it.
Getting the wood was another problem. All the decent trees have Tree
Preservation Orders on them and we live in a Site of Special Scientific
Interest set up in order to protect the spotted owl. I tried to convince
the environmentalists that I needed the wood to save the owls - but no
go!
When I started gathering the animals, the RSPCA sued me. They insisted
that I was confining wild animals against their will. They argued the
accommodation was too restrictive, and it was cruel and inhumane to put
so many animals in a confined space.
Then the County Council, the Environment Agency and the Rivers Authority
ruled that I couldn't build the Ark until they'd conducted an
environmental impact study on your proposed flood.
I'm still trying to resolve a complaint with the Equal Opportunities
Commission on how many disabled carpenter's I'm supposed to hire for my
building team. The trades unions say I can't use my sons. They insist I
have to hire only accredited workers with Ark-building experience.
To make matters worse, Customs and Excise seized all my assets, claiming
I'm trying to leave the country illegally with endangered species.
So, forgive me, Lord, but it would take at least 10 years for me to
finish this Ark. "
Suddenly the skies cleared, the sun began to shine, and a rainbow
stretched across the sky.
Noah looked up in wonder and asked, "You mean you're not going to
destroy the world?"
"No," said the Lord. "The British government beat me to it."
and said, "Once again, the earth has become wicked and over-populated,
and I see the end of all flesh before me. Build another Ark and save two
of every living thing along with a few good humans."
He gave Noah the CATIA drawings, saying, "You have 6 months to build the
Ark before I will start the unending rain for 40 days and 40 nights."
Six months later, the Lord looked down and saw Noah weeping in his yard
but no Ark. Noah!" He roared, "I'm about to start the rain! Where is the
Ark?"
"Forgive me, Lord," begged Noah, "but things have changed.
I needed Building Regulations Approval and I've been arguing with the
Fire Brigade about the need for a sprinkler system.
My neighbours claim that I should have obtained planning permission for
building the Ark in my garden because it is development of the site,
even though in my view it is a temporary structure.
We had to then go to appeal to the Secretary of State for a decision.
Then the Department of Transport demanded a bond be posted for the
future costs of moving power lines and other overhead obstructions to
clear the passage for the Ark 's move to the sea. I told them that the
sea would be coming to us, but they would hear nothing of it.
Getting the wood was another problem. All the decent trees have Tree
Preservation Orders on them and we live in a Site of Special Scientific
Interest set up in order to protect the spotted owl. I tried to convince
the environmentalists that I needed the wood to save the owls - but no
go!
When I started gathering the animals, the RSPCA sued me. They insisted
that I was confining wild animals against their will. They argued the
accommodation was too restrictive, and it was cruel and inhumane to put
so many animals in a confined space.
Then the County Council, the Environment Agency and the Rivers Authority
ruled that I couldn't build the Ark until they'd conducted an
environmental impact study on your proposed flood.
I'm still trying to resolve a complaint with the Equal Opportunities
Commission on how many disabled carpenter's I'm supposed to hire for my
building team. The trades unions say I can't use my sons. They insist I
have to hire only accredited workers with Ark-building experience.
To make matters worse, Customs and Excise seized all my assets, claiming
I'm trying to leave the country illegally with endangered species.
So, forgive me, Lord, but it would take at least 10 years for me to
finish this Ark. "
Suddenly the skies cleared, the sun began to shine, and a rainbow
stretched across the sky.
Noah looked up in wonder and asked, "You mean you're not going to
destroy the world?"
"No," said the Lord. "The British government beat me to it."
Channel 4's Mosque program
Mark Kaye responded to THIS article.
Some very serious questions indeed need to be answered regarding police independence in the face of their bizarre decision to turn the tables on the broadcasters of Channel 4's Undercover Mosque programme.
Firstly, if the footage seen of mad mullahs preaching death to unbelievers and homosexuals was completely made up then surely the police and the CPS would have had grounds to arrest the programme makers and charge them with the falsely reporting crimes, wasting police time and inciting race/religious hatred. In the case of a woman falsely reporting a rape, then this would have undoubtedly have happened.
Secondly, if the footage had been made up, then surely these preachers would now be running to their solicitors to file a case for liable against Channel 4 in the certain knowledge that their booty would be guaranteed. None of this has happened. Instead, by referring the "evidence" to a secret body called the broadcasting watchdog, the public will never get to see the unedited footage or listen to the "evidence." The watchdog hasn't got the independence of a court and they will act as Judge, Jury and Executioner on the programme makers in complete privacy. The police have obviously "copped" out of this case just like they did in the cash for peerages case because their high ranking Police Chief Officers, who are nothing more than left-wing politicians in uniform, have formed such good friendships with the Labour Party. The trial of BNP leader Nick Griffin and Mark Collett demonstrates this perfectly. Whilst the case had many similarities with regards the points of law breeched, the edited footage seen by the public showed no indication of incitement to commit acts of violence, yet the police and the CPS tried twice to prosecute. Even when the case was thrown out the second time by a jury, senior politicians including the now Prime Minister Gordon Brown were heard making criticisms of the jury's decision and how the law needed "tightening up." The whole thing stinks of political interference and the Labour party's determination to apply the law differently to different people.
Britain used to be renowned has having the fairest justice system in the world. This case is just another nail in the coffin that represents just how corrupt and unfair it has become. The case has also exposed the hypocrisy of all these left-wing and neo-liberal idiots who have suddenly jumped on this bandwagon. Disgraced George Galloway MP was heard on the radio this morning trying to re-enforce credibility for his views by claiming they were now endorsed by the CPS and the Police. Well, all that can be said about this George is that the CPS has already fully established itself as a joke organisation that is committed to the goal of protecting criminals and humiliating their victims. As for the police, is this the same police force that you have so loudly claim is institutionally racist for stopping and searching too many black people?
Mark Kaye
Some very serious questions indeed need to be answered regarding police independence in the face of their bizarre decision to turn the tables on the broadcasters of Channel 4's Undercover Mosque programme.
Firstly, if the footage seen of mad mullahs preaching death to unbelievers and homosexuals was completely made up then surely the police and the CPS would have had grounds to arrest the programme makers and charge them with the falsely reporting crimes, wasting police time and inciting race/religious hatred. In the case of a woman falsely reporting a rape, then this would have undoubtedly have happened.
Secondly, if the footage had been made up, then surely these preachers would now be running to their solicitors to file a case for liable against Channel 4 in the certain knowledge that their booty would be guaranteed. None of this has happened. Instead, by referring the "evidence" to a secret body called the broadcasting watchdog, the public will never get to see the unedited footage or listen to the "evidence." The watchdog hasn't got the independence of a court and they will act as Judge, Jury and Executioner on the programme makers in complete privacy. The police have obviously "copped" out of this case just like they did in the cash for peerages case because their high ranking Police Chief Officers, who are nothing more than left-wing politicians in uniform, have formed such good friendships with the Labour Party. The trial of BNP leader Nick Griffin and Mark Collett demonstrates this perfectly. Whilst the case had many similarities with regards the points of law breeched, the edited footage seen by the public showed no indication of incitement to commit acts of violence, yet the police and the CPS tried twice to prosecute. Even when the case was thrown out the second time by a jury, senior politicians including the now Prime Minister Gordon Brown were heard making criticisms of the jury's decision and how the law needed "tightening up." The whole thing stinks of political interference and the Labour party's determination to apply the law differently to different people.
Britain used to be renowned has having the fairest justice system in the world. This case is just another nail in the coffin that represents just how corrupt and unfair it has become. The case has also exposed the hypocrisy of all these left-wing and neo-liberal idiots who have suddenly jumped on this bandwagon. Disgraced George Galloway MP was heard on the radio this morning trying to re-enforce credibility for his views by claiming they were now endorsed by the CPS and the Police. Well, all that can be said about this George is that the CPS has already fully established itself as a joke organisation that is committed to the goal of protecting criminals and humiliating their victims. As for the police, is this the same police force that you have so loudly claim is institutionally racist for stopping and searching too many black people?
Mark Kaye
WRONG KIND OF WHITE
Mark Kaye sent this amazing story to us. You couldn’t make this stuff up!!A Teenage science student has been banned from applying for a training programme with the Environment Agency because she is English and white. The recruitment agency handling the scheme told Abigail Howarth, 18, that there was no point in her applying because of her ethnic background. Abigail wrote back to the agency in disbelief and three days later she received a letter from the agencies recruitment officer, Bola Odusi telling her that the training programme was targeted at ethnic minorities only. Apparently the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) is investigating this case of anti-white discrimination but being as the CRE is largely responsible for initiating the legislation that encourages employers to discriminate against whites, its a little bit like placing a pint of beer in front of an alcoholic and asking him not to drink it. This type of anti-white discrimination by New Labour is remarkably similar to the Nuremburg Laws of Nazi Germany in the 1930's. Whereas the Nazis banned Jews from applying to work in government departments, New Labour are banning white people from applying to work in government departments. Surely most people agree with the BNP in that the best person for the job should be working in the government department!
Prison Works
..
It often said by liberal and left-wing criminal luvvies that prison does not work. Of course it works. Only an idiot would say otherwise. It works because whilst criminals are locked up in prison they can't go out and commit crime! Even a three year old can understand that! Unfortunately our prisons are full because the liberal lefties have shortened sentencing to the point where prison has become a temporary inconvenience rather than a harsh deterrent. As a result, crime has exploded and with it too, the prison population. Now prisoners enjoy better access to healthcare than the general population and are even given free "safe syringes" with which to participate in their illegal drug activities. They do not have to work to earn their living and they are treated to all the modern conveniences such as radio and TV. Prisoners are so well looked after these days that it costs of over £60,000 per year just to keep one of them there - over three times more than most people take home in their pay.
If prisoner’s sentences were increased to reflect the severity of their crimes then the prison population would actually fall. And for those repeat offenders like violent muggers, burglars and car thieves who don't change their ways and have been misled to believe that that society owes them something, I'm afraid the death penalty is the only remedy. Yes, I can just imagine it now. All those liberal lefties frothing at the mouth in shock and horror at the thought that I would like to see these people removed from our society on a permanent basis so that the rest of us can get on with our lives in piece. What a pity these sick and twisted liberal lefties don't show one tenth of this concern when an old aged pensioner is shot or when a young toddler is mown down by some drug induced car thief just outside their own front door.
If prisoner’s sentences were increased to reflect the severity of their crimes then the prison population would actually fall. And for those repeat offenders like violent muggers, burglars and car thieves who don't change their ways and have been misled to believe that that society owes them something, I'm afraid the death penalty is the only remedy. Yes, I can just imagine it now. All those liberal lefties frothing at the mouth in shock and horror at the thought that I would like to see these people removed from our society on a permanent basis so that the rest of us can get on with our lives in piece. What a pity these sick and twisted liberal lefties don't show one tenth of this concern when an old aged pensioner is shot or when a young toddler is mown down by some drug induced car thief just outside their own front door.
Mark Kaye
You couldn't make up such an idiotic situation if you tried!
Imagine the following scenario: A group of policemen witness a violent
unprovoked murder of a man outside his home. The murderer is still standing
around when the wife of the man opens the door and shouts some insults to
the murderer. The group of policemen arrest and charge the woman to appear
in court on public order offences. The murderer walks away free, threatening
to kill even more people.
Sounds absurd? Well consider this:
In July 2005 Muslim terrorists murdered over 50 people in London and seriously injured many others. Two weeks later, they tried again. Thousands of Muslim crackpots where subsequently seen on TV marching the streets of London in support the terrorist atrocities. Only two were arrested and tried. Meanwhile, Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP was arrested and tried twice for insulting Muslim extremists and for warning that they were plotting terrorist attacks. To make matters even more absurd the police introduced a policy of dismissing officers who are members of the BNP, a legally registered, peaceful and democratic political party. Yet in response to recent revelations by MI5 that up to eight police officers are suspected of having links with Al Qaeda the police have said that the suspected jihadists have not even been suspended because they claim that the police do not have the legal power to suspend or dismiss them! One suspected jihadist officer working in the South East has been allowed to keep his job despite being caught circulating Internet images of beheadings and roadside bombings in Iraq.
This situation demonstrates that the police have been turned up side down by this evil politically correct government and it's blind efforts to recruit minorities the point where the force is an enemy the British people. They make up their own legal powers and exercise them as and when they choose. This evidence demonstrates that they persecute law abiding individuals but condone and support the Muslim terrorists who are trying murder the people of this country because they do not follow a book (the Koran) which instructs its followers to kill unbelievers.
I have great trouble in understanding why the people of this country haven't already taken matters into their own hands and declared a civil war to liberate us from this evil and to restore the democracy and sensibility that existed in this country not too many years ago.
Mark Kaye
unprovoked murder of a man outside his home. The murderer is still standing
around when the wife of the man opens the door and shouts some insults to
the murderer. The group of policemen arrest and charge the woman to appear
in court on public order offences. The murderer walks away free, threatening
to kill even more people.
Sounds absurd? Well consider this:
In July 2005 Muslim terrorists murdered over 50 people in London and seriously injured many others. Two weeks later, they tried again. Thousands of Muslim crackpots where subsequently seen on TV marching the streets of London in support the terrorist atrocities. Only two were arrested and tried. Meanwhile, Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP was arrested and tried twice for insulting Muslim extremists and for warning that they were plotting terrorist attacks. To make matters even more absurd the police introduced a policy of dismissing officers who are members of the BNP, a legally registered, peaceful and democratic political party. Yet in response to recent revelations by MI5 that up to eight police officers are suspected of having links with Al Qaeda the police have said that the suspected jihadists have not even been suspended because they claim that the police do not have the legal power to suspend or dismiss them! One suspected jihadist officer working in the South East has been allowed to keep his job despite being caught circulating Internet images of beheadings and roadside bombings in Iraq.
This situation demonstrates that the police have been turned up side down by this evil politically correct government and it's blind efforts to recruit minorities the point where the force is an enemy the British people. They make up their own legal powers and exercise them as and when they choose. This evidence demonstrates that they persecute law abiding individuals but condone and support the Muslim terrorists who are trying murder the people of this country because they do not follow a book (the Koran) which instructs its followers to kill unbelievers.
I have great trouble in understanding why the people of this country haven't already taken matters into their own hands and declared a civil war to liberate us from this evil and to restore the democracy and sensibility that existed in this country not too many years ago.
Mark Kaye
The Murder of Keith Brown
At just after 4pm on Friday 6th of July, despite valiant efforts by paramedics, 52 year old Keith Brown was pronounced dead on the front lawn of his garden in Normacot, Stoke-on-Trent. The police, the local newspaper (the Sentinel), together with local TV and radio reported that Keith had died as the result of, “a dispute between neighbours”. As has become the norm when white indigenous people are killed by non-white immigrants no further details were given about the attack and the public were simply left to imagine just what might have occurred.
Had the roles of victim/perpetrator been reversed of course the media and the police would have gone to extraordinary lengths to emphasise the depths of British wickedness and speculate as to what great heights the victim would have climbed had the community not been deprived by yet another act of “white racism”.
The British people have become so used to the double standards employed in the reporting of race crime it has become understood amongst many British people that an attack on one of their own together with a non descriptive account of the assailants can mean only one thing.
Maybe there is some perverse logic operating here, perhaps with all good intentions the police and the media are justifying their selective treatment of racially-motivated assault, rape and murder as for the better interests of the community as a whole. Nevertheless, even the most twisted of liberal minds must be able to understand the consequences of completely writing off the indigenous population and that only in the relative short-term can they get away with it.
BNP presence on council
Unfortunately for those content to sacrifice their own kind on the altar of diversity, the latest Muslim gang murder of an Englishman took place in Stoke-on-Trent. This very English city regularly votes en masse for British National Party representatives with the result that, despite massive efforts by the Labour Party, a powerful block of BNP councillors sits in the Civic Hall. The people of this city are fair-minded, proud and intelligent and easily able to repel the constant stream of ethno-masochistic propaganda that is regularly directed towards them. The people of Stoke elect BNP councilors for a reason, because they believe with all their hearts that the Party and its councillors are the only ones prepared to tell the truth.
In many British town and cities the murder of another one of our own kind at the hands of yet another gang of Muslim thugs could very well be covered up, but not in Stoke. What you are about to read is the shocking and scandalous truth about the murder of Keith Brown, a man now being mourned by seven children.
Land grab
The so-called neighbourhood dispute first started when Keith Brown’s Muslim neighbours decided to move the fence that divides their property an extra two feet in their favour. Keith tried all he could to get the council’s legal team to stop the erection of concrete posts and new fence panels on his property, but despite being advised that he was “in the right” on several occasions nothing was done.
Every morning Keith would open his curtains to see this encroachment on his own bit of land, his own personal space and, as the large Muslim family started to take pleasure in goading him about the invasion of his property, his quality of life became minimal.
The relationship between the neighbours became seriously strained and it was not long before the police were called to intervene. Amazingly though it was Keith who found himself dragged before the courts on a trumped up charge of “racism”, but thankfully his West Indian neighbour appeared as a witness and described the charges as ridiculous. Eventually the case was thrown out.
Keith’s eldest son was actually sent to prison for later defending his father against a further physical assault, the injustice of which hurt Keith considerably.
Last year the brake pipes of Keith’s van were cut and he narrowly avoided a serious accident. Not long after this Keith’s beloved English bull terrier was poisoned to death and his Alsatian puppy mysteriously disappeared.
Throughout all of this time Keith and his partner had requested to move from the area to a new council house, but despite being on the housing list for years nothing was ever done for them.
CCTV footage
In desperation Keith fitted a CCTV system to his house in order to obtain video evidence of the continued racially-motivated abuse and assaults directed towards him and his family. One such assault was indeed captured on video and burnt to DVD. Last year Stoke BNP councillor Steve Batkin requested a meeting with a local police Inspector at Sutherland Road Police Station in Longton to hand over the DVD and to complain about Muslim drug dealing in the area. The female, Asian officer refused to even take the DVD and dismissed Steve’s formal complaint about the continuing assaults on Keith Brown saying that , “she knew who he was”. In the minuted meeting she at least said she would look at the narcotics issue, but later informed Steve that the alleged drug-dealing was just down to “private hire drivers falling asleep in their cars”.
The months of anguish continued for Keith, abuse, assaults and smashed windows until finally the inevitable but entirely avoidable happed. Last Friday afternoon witnesses saw Keith and his neighbours in yet another flare up. Keith had just returned from picking up his three youngest children from school when he was confronted by a group of Muslim men outside his house. Whilst Keith was remonstrating with these men another Muslim man crept from behind a car and plunged a large knife in his back. Keith never saw it coming, but his three young children did. Having brutally attacked Keith the gang then set about his 19-year-old son leaving him hospitalised.
As Keith lay dying in his garden, paramedics desperately tried to resuscitate him, but Keith had already slipped away, stabbed in the back by his murderer and stabbed in the back by those who should have protected him.
One of the things we have always been proud of in this country is that, unlike other countries, life is not cheap here. Not anymore, even in Third world countries never would the ruling elite, the police and the media despise their fellow countrymen so much that they would conspire to ensure that their lives were made the cheapest of them all.
BNP News
Had the roles of victim/perpetrator been reversed of course the media and the police would have gone to extraordinary lengths to emphasise the depths of British wickedness and speculate as to what great heights the victim would have climbed had the community not been deprived by yet another act of “white racism”.
The British people have become so used to the double standards employed in the reporting of race crime it has become understood amongst many British people that an attack on one of their own together with a non descriptive account of the assailants can mean only one thing.
Maybe there is some perverse logic operating here, perhaps with all good intentions the police and the media are justifying their selective treatment of racially-motivated assault, rape and murder as for the better interests of the community as a whole. Nevertheless, even the most twisted of liberal minds must be able to understand the consequences of completely writing off the indigenous population and that only in the relative short-term can they get away with it.
BNP presence on council
Unfortunately for those content to sacrifice their own kind on the altar of diversity, the latest Muslim gang murder of an Englishman took place in Stoke-on-Trent. This very English city regularly votes en masse for British National Party representatives with the result that, despite massive efforts by the Labour Party, a powerful block of BNP councillors sits in the Civic Hall. The people of this city are fair-minded, proud and intelligent and easily able to repel the constant stream of ethno-masochistic propaganda that is regularly directed towards them. The people of Stoke elect BNP councilors for a reason, because they believe with all their hearts that the Party and its councillors are the only ones prepared to tell the truth.
In many British town and cities the murder of another one of our own kind at the hands of yet another gang of Muslim thugs could very well be covered up, but not in Stoke. What you are about to read is the shocking and scandalous truth about the murder of Keith Brown, a man now being mourned by seven children.
Land grab
The so-called neighbourhood dispute first started when Keith Brown’s Muslim neighbours decided to move the fence that divides their property an extra two feet in their favour. Keith tried all he could to get the council’s legal team to stop the erection of concrete posts and new fence panels on his property, but despite being advised that he was “in the right” on several occasions nothing was done.
Every morning Keith would open his curtains to see this encroachment on his own bit of land, his own personal space and, as the large Muslim family started to take pleasure in goading him about the invasion of his property, his quality of life became minimal.
The relationship between the neighbours became seriously strained and it was not long before the police were called to intervene. Amazingly though it was Keith who found himself dragged before the courts on a trumped up charge of “racism”, but thankfully his West Indian neighbour appeared as a witness and described the charges as ridiculous. Eventually the case was thrown out.
Keith’s eldest son was actually sent to prison for later defending his father against a further physical assault, the injustice of which hurt Keith considerably.
Last year the brake pipes of Keith’s van were cut and he narrowly avoided a serious accident. Not long after this Keith’s beloved English bull terrier was poisoned to death and his Alsatian puppy mysteriously disappeared.
Throughout all of this time Keith and his partner had requested to move from the area to a new council house, but despite being on the housing list for years nothing was ever done for them.
CCTV footage
In desperation Keith fitted a CCTV system to his house in order to obtain video evidence of the continued racially-motivated abuse and assaults directed towards him and his family. One such assault was indeed captured on video and burnt to DVD. Last year Stoke BNP councillor Steve Batkin requested a meeting with a local police Inspector at Sutherland Road Police Station in Longton to hand over the DVD and to complain about Muslim drug dealing in the area. The female, Asian officer refused to even take the DVD and dismissed Steve’s formal complaint about the continuing assaults on Keith Brown saying that , “she knew who he was”. In the minuted meeting she at least said she would look at the narcotics issue, but later informed Steve that the alleged drug-dealing was just down to “private hire drivers falling asleep in their cars”.
The months of anguish continued for Keith, abuse, assaults and smashed windows until finally the inevitable but entirely avoidable happed. Last Friday afternoon witnesses saw Keith and his neighbours in yet another flare up. Keith had just returned from picking up his three youngest children from school when he was confronted by a group of Muslim men outside his house. Whilst Keith was remonstrating with these men another Muslim man crept from behind a car and plunged a large knife in his back. Keith never saw it coming, but his three young children did. Having brutally attacked Keith the gang then set about his 19-year-old son leaving him hospitalised.
As Keith lay dying in his garden, paramedics desperately tried to resuscitate him, but Keith had already slipped away, stabbed in the back by his murderer and stabbed in the back by those who should have protected him.
One of the things we have always been proud of in this country is that, unlike other countries, life is not cheap here. Not anymore, even in Third world countries never would the ruling elite, the police and the media despise their fellow countrymen so much that they would conspire to ensure that their lives were made the cheapest of them all.
BNP News
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
