Whites Need Not Apply


Why should you support Labour when Labour does not support you?

Before Labour's racist anti-white labour laws, the best person for the job would
have got it.

These days, if you happen to be the wrong colour, you won't even get an interview.

What better proof do you need, that it is Labour who are the genuine racists?

What better excuse do you need to get out there and fight for your own rights for a change, by supporting and voting for the BNP?

2 comments:

najistani said...

I found this at Lancaster UAF, of all places:

"In seven years the BNP vote has grown 97 fold, polling over 3,000 votes in 2000 to over 292,000 in 2007. If the BNP’s vote trend continues they could be on course to make a significant breakthrough into British politics. This year the BNP will be standing candidates in the London Assembly and local elections across Britain. In previous London Assembly elections in 2004 the BNP missed getting elected by a mere 0.1%. "

From http://lancasteruaf.blogspot.com/2008/01/uaf-national-conference-1st-march-2008.html

Now my maths isn't all it was, but I think I'm correct in saying that 97 is 1.92 to the power of 7.

This means that the smoothed-out compound growth rate in BNP votes over that seven year period was 92% per annum.

Or to put it another way, on average BNP support is doubling every 13 months.

najistani said...

BLOG CENSORSHIP ALERT!

In order to preserve the crumbling credibility of THE BIG LIE , the British government, and probably other dhimmi governments, are working on ways to gag, censor and and shutdown the counter-Jihadist blogosphere.

There is currently a discusion of how to prepare for these attacks on freedom of expression at http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2008/01/najistani-on-why-britain-may-crack-down.html and http://commonsenseagainstislam.websanon.com/?p=113.

- Najistani