Reichskirchenfuhrer Williams looked down at his image in the mirror before him. He admired the sleek dark lines of his deep black apparel. He noticed the fetching, white military style clerical collar with the comely ‘SS ’ runes, denoting Synod Staffel in, Greek New Testament script, stamped either side of his neck. He raised himself up and placing his hands behind his back, admired his equally dark black gaiters…He looked down at his equally black shoes…. ‘Das ist richtig!’ he murmured to himself ‘Ein Perfekt Synod Staffel soldaten und Offizier!’
A knock came at the door. ‘Ja!?’ Who is das?’ he replied…
‘Mein Reichkirchensfuhrer, It ist Untervicar Smythe!’
‘Enter!’
A little man dressed in the uniform of a full Untervicar came in. He raised his right arm in salute. ‘Heil Brown!’ The Reichskirchenfuhrer acknowledged it with a simple raising of his right lower arm; an almost dismissive gesture.
‘Vat ist it you vish fur Smythe?’
‘Mein team und me haf completed the study and plans to extend Sharia Law mein Reichskirchenfuhrer!’
Reichkirchenfuhrer Williams stared at the little man. He thought he looked just like a little mongrel dog he used to kick about the church pews after a bad Sunday service…
Ach so, das ist gut! Soon we vill haf a Islamischer stadt und Church ja? Gut work Smythe, I shall recommend you fur der Iron Crucifix Second Class!’
The little mongrel like Untervicar looked crestfallen.
‘Vot is wrong Smythe?’
‘Er only second class mein Reichskirchenfuher!?’
‘Ja you spelt Islam mit two ‘Ls’, Zey have stated that you haf insulted Islam, und you would not like to be under a fatwa eh Smythe?’
The little Untervicar visibly shaking in fear replied, ‘Off course not Herr Reichskirchenfuher!’
‘Sehr Gut, Smythe, be grateful to your Meister fur small Christian mercies ja?’
‘Danke! Herr Reichskirchenfuhrer!’
‘You are forgiven UnterVicar!’
He clicked his gaiters and saluting about turned.
Rowan Williams dreaded head of the Synod Staffel, walked over to his phone. He raised the receiver and asked his secretary to come in. An elderly woman of pinch faced looks entered. She wore a grey paisley print dress, and small spectacles that gave her thin face, deathly skull like qualities.
‘Ach Mildred! Be so kind as to take a dictation bitter, und transmit by urgent Reichskirchen poste to my colleague in York. You vill also tramsit ein copy fur der Fuhrer in Westminster ja?’
The woman was deeply in love with her Clerical master. ‘Oh he so commanding and manly’ she thought to herself. She looked at his sharp brown eyes, the dark manly beard, the distinguished Aryan features-she felt her knees weaken.
‘Ach ist der ein problem Fraulein? You haf gone deep red!?’
‘Oh sorry Herr Reichskirchenfuher! It must be the weather!’
‘Shall I turn the heating down?’
‘Oh no Herr Reichskirchenfuhrer!’
‘It is der juden schwein selling us short as usual! One day we shall settle accounts mit dem ja!?’ Der last delivery from Cohen und son contained pig’s fat you know!’
‘Oh really Reichskirchefuhrer?’
‘Ja Fraulien, der schwein knew we supplied the local area mosques! Mein Gott did der Islamischer meister throw ein wobbly! He threatened to decapitate der entire Reichskirchen! ‘’Kuffar pigs!’’ he ranted! He threatened us mit no more interfaith dialogue!’
‘Dreadful situation, Herr Reichskirchenfuhrer!’
He was visibly sweating… ‘Ve could haf lost our heads ja? You must be careful mit der Islamisher volk hein? Now to business! Begin bitter!’
‘Dear John,
Our holy Brother auf York in Christ, ve nicht understand your objections to the new ranks and titles, recently applied by the Synod Staffel! Vos ist der problem mein Brother auf Christ? It has also been reported that you are still holding strict Church of England services contrary to SS Ordnung B3, instructing dat all der services, ist Multifaith! Dieses instruczion ist nicht voluntary but ein Fuhrerkommand auf Downing Strasse Hauptkommandantur! Your name has been mentioned by Frauleins Smith und Blears fur investigation by Gehiemstaatkirchenpolizeiamt IV, Multifaith Investigatatory, Diversity in Dialogue Section.
You do understand my dear Bruther auf York what that means ja?’
Vie are also informed, dat you haf increased your Christian congregation in direct contravention of SS Ordnung 4, and refused to allow combined Islamic, devil worship services to encourage statutory interfaith worship. We are most concerned zat you stopped a service in York Cathedral just as a virgin was about to be ritually slaughtered on the altar besides an upside down cross!
How in der name of Allah is zis going to assist interfaith dialogue, tolerance, understanding und diversity in der multifaith community? Und when der Satanichser beings dematerilised you called in der Parish Excorcist!
Mein phone has never stopped ringing mit complaints from our Pagan friends and their Demonic colleagues. As you know I am in der process of negotiating the sale of mein soul und acquiring 72 virgins, as a part of mutual interfaith understanding. As you know we intend to hold a Mass fur Adolf Hitler next week as part of European Union Week of Forgiveness and Reconciliation! There will be readings from Mein Kamp and the Holy Quoran to encourage a feeling of Community prayer and joint action.
I hope dear Brother York in Christ. You will comply mit mein instructions ja!’
Yours in Christ!
Rowan
SS Reichkirchenfuhrer
Lambeth
General Synod
By GLT
Socialist Unity?
I've been rummaging around an amusing place called Socialist Unity, which is composed of wooly-hatted and wooly-brained people who like to protest about things, but don't want to get their hands dirty by actually doing anything. It's up to someone else to do the stuff. They just shout until it gets done.
At one of their shouting sessions in which they shouted about other people having money and not giving it to them, several shops were smashed and looted. Naturally, they didn't do it, it was 'pseudo-anarchists' (the socialist untiers are real anarchists, because they vote for and support this government. Don't ask me, it's their logic). Or maybe it was 'police provocateurs'. It can't have been any of their shouty friends because all they do is shout.
Anyway, the police rounded up a few of them and locked them away for a while. Outrage! Repression by authoritarians! Human rights! Toilets! Tea and sandwiches!.
Lois said: “I am angry and outraged at the Lords judgement, which found there was no ‘arbitrary deprivation of liberty’”. I and thousands of other peaceful anti-globalisation protesters were detained by police for nine hours, in a confined space, and without water, food or toilet facilities. To any reasonable person, this clearly amounted to a deprivation of liberty and the police action on May Day 2001 breaches European Convention on human rights”.
No tea and sandwiches? Why, it was practically Auschwitz. Nine hours? Murderers get out in less time. The police would never detain an MP for nine hours... oh wait.
“The Lords have judged the police can take such draconian action, as they deem fit, against protesters. Since 2001, we have seen the police use similar detainment tactics against other peaceful demonstrators, including against environmental protests and recently against Gaza war demonstrators.
These repressive police tactics are an attempt to intimidate protesters and the right to demonstrate.
"Huh? No, no, no, Lefties. We are not a police state. You've told us so yourselves. Repeatedly. We're just paranoid, remember? Labour isn't out to repress us all. They aren't banning demonstrations. You just have to give the police notice, so they know where to find you when it's time to round you up.
“Our fight against poverty and exploitation continues, as does our campaign to have the basic democratic rights to protest.”
They are incensed that they can't protest. Whatever happened to free speech, eh? Whatever happened to the right to protest?
You did this, Lefties. You don't like it, do you? You voted for it and you support it with your union dues. You didn't think it would apply to you, you thought it was for the dangerous far-right groups like trainspotters and tourists. Now you're getting a taste of what your beloved socialism is all about, you don't like it at all. And still you can't see that it's your ideals, your policies that are at play here. This is socialism, Lefties. This is what it's like, this is what you wanted.
The lefties are furious. So they're taking their case to Europe, where they actually think they'll get their rights back.
I shouldn't laugh, but for some reason I find I just can't stop.
Leg-Ion
At one of their shouting sessions in which they shouted about other people having money and not giving it to them, several shops were smashed and looted. Naturally, they didn't do it, it was 'pseudo-anarchists' (the socialist untiers are real anarchists, because they vote for and support this government. Don't ask me, it's their logic). Or maybe it was 'police provocateurs'. It can't have been any of their shouty friends because all they do is shout.
Anyway, the police rounded up a few of them and locked them away for a while. Outrage! Repression by authoritarians! Human rights! Toilets! Tea and sandwiches!.
Lois said: “I am angry and outraged at the Lords judgement, which found there was no ‘arbitrary deprivation of liberty’”. I and thousands of other peaceful anti-globalisation protesters were detained by police for nine hours, in a confined space, and without water, food or toilet facilities. To any reasonable person, this clearly amounted to a deprivation of liberty and the police action on May Day 2001 breaches European Convention on human rights”.
No tea and sandwiches? Why, it was practically Auschwitz. Nine hours? Murderers get out in less time. The police would never detain an MP for nine hours... oh wait.
“The Lords have judged the police can take such draconian action, as they deem fit, against protesters. Since 2001, we have seen the police use similar detainment tactics against other peaceful demonstrators, including against environmental protests and recently against Gaza war demonstrators.
These repressive police tactics are an attempt to intimidate protesters and the right to demonstrate.
"Huh? No, no, no, Lefties. We are not a police state. You've told us so yourselves. Repeatedly. We're just paranoid, remember? Labour isn't out to repress us all. They aren't banning demonstrations. You just have to give the police notice, so they know where to find you when it's time to round you up.
“Our fight against poverty and exploitation continues, as does our campaign to have the basic democratic rights to protest.”
They are incensed that they can't protest. Whatever happened to free speech, eh? Whatever happened to the right to protest?
You did this, Lefties. You don't like it, do you? You voted for it and you support it with your union dues. You didn't think it would apply to you, you thought it was for the dangerous far-right groups like trainspotters and tourists. Now you're getting a taste of what your beloved socialism is all about, you don't like it at all. And still you can't see that it's your ideals, your policies that are at play here. This is socialism, Lefties. This is what it's like, this is what you wanted.
The lefties are furious. So they're taking their case to Europe, where they actually think they'll get their rights back.
I shouldn't laugh, but for some reason I find I just can't stop.
Leg-Ion
Nothing to hide, so it's okay to hide it.
Soon, the massed ranks of the Bloated 646 will vote on whether they can hide those tedious little expenses from us. The ones we pay for but have no right to know about.
This week, I have to pay my tax bill. The one generated by a tax form on which I had to account for all my expenses with receipts and justifications. Expenses I, and nobody else, paid for.
The taxman can call me and demand an audit any time he pleases and demand proof that every paperclip, every envelope and every biro was used exclusively for business purposes. I haven't spent anyone else's money. The 646 want to be exempt from this kind of thing. They spend everyone else's money. Something odd here, perhaps?
The Libertarian party (note, I'm not a member) has urged everyone to contact their MP and ask them to vote this insanity away.
The Righteous Paul Flynn, Labour MP for some obscure corner of Newport, Wales, states that it's all in our imagination. There is no scheme to hide expenses. It's all blog hysteria and press babbling. He doesn't know which way he will vote yet or whether he'll bother at all. On what, Mr. Flynn? The non-cover-up non-change to the non-legislation that isn't being proposed?
He'll vote. I know which way he will vote.
How can I know this?
Simple. The Brown Gorgon is fully in support of this scheme and has imposed a three line whip to make sure his Children of the Night vote as instructed. So poor Mr. Flynn will be voting as he's told for a measure he doesn't believe exists. The doublethink involved here is truly breathtaking.
Well, he can count himself lucky. This is one of the few things MPs get to vote on now. Even if they have to vote as they're told, at least they get a vote, which is more than they had on Heathrow or bin tax or job adverts, all done through little paragraphs hidden in other legislation that grant the Gorgon and his coven the power to ignore Parliament. That includes you, Mr. Flynn. Yes, they don't care about your opinion either.
Some Labour MP's have said they oppose the action. Frank Field, Mark Fisher, Kate Hoey, David Winnick. I take off my hat, heavy though it is, in appreciation of the last remaining semblance of reasonable behaviour in the Labour party. If they do vote against a three line whip they'll suffer for it and they deserve respect for having that courage.
The Cameroids fare less well, with only two opposers named so far and nothing but incoherent mumblings from 'Hello Dave'. Little Clegg of the Dim Liberals has stated this action is wrong, and good for him. (Still won't vote for you, Clegg, but do give my regards to Compo).
And yet Mr. Flynn insists there is no expenses cover-up planned. The Gorgon supports it, several of his own MPs decry it, a three line whip insists he must vote for it and yet it doesn't exist.
It must be amazing to live in such a mind. Timothy Leary would turn green with envy at such a kaliedoscope of realities.
Ignorance is strength.
This week, I have to pay my tax bill. The one generated by a tax form on which I had to account for all my expenses with receipts and justifications. Expenses I, and nobody else, paid for.
The taxman can call me and demand an audit any time he pleases and demand proof that every paperclip, every envelope and every biro was used exclusively for business purposes. I haven't spent anyone else's money. The 646 want to be exempt from this kind of thing. They spend everyone else's money. Something odd here, perhaps?
The Libertarian party (note, I'm not a member) has urged everyone to contact their MP and ask them to vote this insanity away.
The Righteous Paul Flynn, Labour MP for some obscure corner of Newport, Wales, states that it's all in our imagination. There is no scheme to hide expenses. It's all blog hysteria and press babbling. He doesn't know which way he will vote yet or whether he'll bother at all. On what, Mr. Flynn? The non-cover-up non-change to the non-legislation that isn't being proposed?
He'll vote. I know which way he will vote.
How can I know this?
Simple. The Brown Gorgon is fully in support of this scheme and has imposed a three line whip to make sure his Children of the Night vote as instructed. So poor Mr. Flynn will be voting as he's told for a measure he doesn't believe exists. The doublethink involved here is truly breathtaking.
Well, he can count himself lucky. This is one of the few things MPs get to vote on now. Even if they have to vote as they're told, at least they get a vote, which is more than they had on Heathrow or bin tax or job adverts, all done through little paragraphs hidden in other legislation that grant the Gorgon and his coven the power to ignore Parliament. That includes you, Mr. Flynn. Yes, they don't care about your opinion either.
Some Labour MP's have said they oppose the action. Frank Field, Mark Fisher, Kate Hoey, David Winnick. I take off my hat, heavy though it is, in appreciation of the last remaining semblance of reasonable behaviour in the Labour party. If they do vote against a three line whip they'll suffer for it and they deserve respect for having that courage.
The Cameroids fare less well, with only two opposers named so far and nothing but incoherent mumblings from 'Hello Dave'. Little Clegg of the Dim Liberals has stated this action is wrong, and good for him. (Still won't vote for you, Clegg, but do give my regards to Compo).
And yet Mr. Flynn insists there is no expenses cover-up planned. The Gorgon supports it, several of his own MPs decry it, a three line whip insists he must vote for it and yet it doesn't exist.
It must be amazing to live in such a mind. Timothy Leary would turn green with envy at such a kaliedoscope of realities.
Ignorance is strength.
CHALLENGE TO THE LEGALITY OF SPEED CAMERAS GATHERS PACE
A serious challenge to the legality of most speeding convictions since the early 1990s is gaining momentum.
The issue concerns the process by which speed measuring devices that have come into use since July 1992 have been authorised. Since that date, the Secretary of State has no longer been empowered to approve the devices without laying a Statutory Instrument (SI) before both Houses of Parliament in each individual case. This has not been done, meaning that the evidence from these devices is not admissible in law. (1)
The ABD's traffic management adviser, Malcolm Heymer, explains, "This is not a trivial issue or an attempt to exploit a 'loophole'. The purpose of the requirement to lay a SI before Parliament is so that speed measuring devices are subject to proper scrutiny. Those authorised since 1992 include laser speed meters, some types of which have repeatedly caused concern that they can give false high readings. Had the proper procedure been followed, these devices might not have been authorised and drivers wrongly convicted."
The procedural error was discovered by Scottish community lawyer Robbie the Pict. The legal point has been argued in cases in Scotland (2) and barrister Michael Shrimpton convinced Nuneaton magistrates in June to throw out a speeding case because the laser speed meter used to provide evidence had not been properly approved. Shrimpton is also acting in a case put before Kingston magistrates (3) and there are more cases in hand in England, Scotland and Wales.
The legal point will ultimately be decided at Appeal. In the meantime, drivers who face prosecution for speeding may wish to request that their case is put on hold pending the outcome, or ask their solicitors to join forces with those involved in the existing cases. This would help force the pace and share the costs.
ABD chairman Brian Gregory remarks, "Once again we see the Government applying heavy-handed enforcement of the letter of the law while having a casual attitude to observing the law itself. If the eventual outcome is that millions of speeding convictions are found to have been unlawful, the cost of reimbursement will be massive, but it will only have itself to blame."
The issue concerns the process by which speed measuring devices that have come into use since July 1992 have been authorised. Since that date, the Secretary of State has no longer been empowered to approve the devices without laying a Statutory Instrument (SI) before both Houses of Parliament in each individual case. This has not been done, meaning that the evidence from these devices is not admissible in law. (1)
The ABD's traffic management adviser, Malcolm Heymer, explains, "This is not a trivial issue or an attempt to exploit a 'loophole'. The purpose of the requirement to lay a SI before Parliament is so that speed measuring devices are subject to proper scrutiny. Those authorised since 1992 include laser speed meters, some types of which have repeatedly caused concern that they can give false high readings. Had the proper procedure been followed, these devices might not have been authorised and drivers wrongly convicted."
The procedural error was discovered by Scottish community lawyer Robbie the Pict. The legal point has been argued in cases in Scotland (2) and barrister Michael Shrimpton convinced Nuneaton magistrates in June to throw out a speeding case because the laser speed meter used to provide evidence had not been properly approved. Shrimpton is also acting in a case put before Kingston magistrates (3) and there are more cases in hand in England, Scotland and Wales.
The legal point will ultimately be decided at Appeal. In the meantime, drivers who face prosecution for speeding may wish to request that their case is put on hold pending the outcome, or ask their solicitors to join forces with those involved in the existing cases. This would help force the pace and share the costs.
ABD chairman Brian Gregory remarks, "Once again we see the Government applying heavy-handed enforcement of the letter of the law while having a casual attitude to observing the law itself. If the eventual outcome is that millions of speeding convictions are found to have been unlawful, the cost of reimbursement will be massive, but it will only have itself to blame."
The Truth About 'Fluoride'
Why are we taking what ever the government throw at us laying down , could this be one reason ? we are told to drink 6-8 glasses of water per day !
Fluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice for tyrant rats.
See also FeedbackFluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice for tyrant rats.
First of all, it needs to be stated that the 'substance' referred to as 'Fluoride' is a misnomer - there is no such substance listed in the periodic chart of the elements, nor in the prestigious CRC handbook, nor in the sacred 'bible' of the pharmaceutical industry - the illustrious 'Merck Index'. Instead, we find a GAS called Fluorine - and from the use of this gas in various industries such as aluminum manufacturing and the nuclear industry -certain toxic byproducts are created which have 'captured' fluorine molecules. One such toxic, poisonous 'byproduct' is called sodium Fluoride - which according to the Merck Index is primarily used as rat and cockroach poison and is also the active ingredient in most toothpastes and as an "additive to drinking water". But sadly, there is much more to this sordid tale.
Did you know that sodium Fluoride is also one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin Nerve Gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUORIDE) - (Yes, folks the same Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists released on a crowded Japanese subway train!). Let me repeat: the truth the American public needs to understand is the fact that Sodium Fluoride is nothing more (or less) than a hazardous waste by-product of the nuclear and aluminum industries. In addition to being the primary ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, it is also a main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic, and psychiatric drugs as well as military NERVE GAS! Why, oh why then is it allowed to be added to the toothpastes and drinking water of the American people?
Historically, this substance was quite expensive for the worlds' premier chemical companies to dispose of - but in the 50's and 60's - Alcoa and the entire aluminum industry - with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste - SOMEHOW sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison at a 20,000% markup and then injecting it into our water supply as well as into the nation's toothpastes and dental rinse. Yes that's right folks, a 20,000% markup. Consider also that when sodium Fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical literally 'goes down the drain' and voila - the chemical industry has not only a free hazardous waste disposal system - but we have also PAID them handsomely in the process!!
Independent scientific evidence over the past 50 plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens our life span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances, and most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one neat little package. There is increasing evidence that aluminum in the brain is a causative factor in Alzheimer's Disease, and evidence points towards sodium fluoride's strong affinity to 'bond' with this dangerous aluminum (remember it is a byproduct of aluminum manufacturing) and also it has the ability to 'trick' the blood-brain barrier by imitating the hydrogen ion thus allowing this chemical access to brain tissue.
Honest scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on sodium fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda campaign have consistently been given a large dose of professional 'black-listing' and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never have received the ink they deserve in the national press. Just follow the money to find the 'control' and you will find prominent American families to be prominent 'players' in the scandal. In 1952 a slick PR campaign rammed the concept of 'fluoridation' through our Public Health departments and various dental organizations. This slick campaign was more akin to a highly emotional "beer salesman convention" instead of the objective, scientifically researched program that it should have been. It has continued in the same vein right up to the present day - and now sodium fluoride use has now become 'usual and customary'.
To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. You need to ask yourself, "Is this particular response based on EMOTIONS born of TRADITION, or is it truly unbiased and based instead on thoroughly researched objectivity?" There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific "know-it-all" emotions attached to the topic of 'sodium fluoride' usage -but I personally have yet to find even ONE objective, double blind study that even remotely links sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE. Instead, I hear and read such blather as "9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend 'fluoride' toothpaste" etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly independent (unattached to moneyed vested interest groups) scientists who've spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been hit with a surprising amount of unfair character assassinations from strong vested-interest groups who reap grand profits from the public's ignorance as well as from their illnesses. (Just follow the money!)
Do you have diabetes and/or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 11 million people are at much higher risk drinking fluoridated water because they will receive a much deadlier dose because of their need for higher than normal water consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary means in which fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is eliminated from the body. Does it not make sense that these people shouldn't drink fluoridated water at all? Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients on dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively small amounts of SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the 'fluoridated' city water supply? Will adequate warnings be given to people with weak kidneys, or will the real cause of such deaths be 'covered up' in the name of 'domestic tranquility'?
Concerning the 'practice' of putting sodium fluoride into drinking water, where did this insanity begin and WHO tried it first? From personal research, the very first occurrence of purposefully putting sodium fluoride into drinking water was in the German ghettos and in Nazi Germany's infamous prison camps. The Gestapo you see had little concern about sodium fluoride's 'supposed' effect on children's teeth; instead, their reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to STERILIZE HUMANS and force the people in their concentration camps into calm, bovine, submission. (See for reference: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" written by Joseph Borkin.) Kind of shocking isn't it folks!! Ah, but it gets even better.
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from a research chemist by the name of Charles Perkins. He writes:
"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, "The Truth about Water Fluoridation", to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. In the 1930's Hitler and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient and cost-effective light lobotomy? --- Ott].
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty."
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go to Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plans to communize the world."
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine --- any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically."
Signed: CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October,1954.
Tarn Lass
Fluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice for tyrant rats.
See also FeedbackFluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice for tyrant rats.
First of all, it needs to be stated that the 'substance' referred to as 'Fluoride' is a misnomer - there is no such substance listed in the periodic chart of the elements, nor in the prestigious CRC handbook, nor in the sacred 'bible' of the pharmaceutical industry - the illustrious 'Merck Index'. Instead, we find a GAS called Fluorine - and from the use of this gas in various industries such as aluminum manufacturing and the nuclear industry -certain toxic byproducts are created which have 'captured' fluorine molecules. One such toxic, poisonous 'byproduct' is called sodium Fluoride - which according to the Merck Index is primarily used as rat and cockroach poison and is also the active ingredient in most toothpastes and as an "additive to drinking water". But sadly, there is much more to this sordid tale.
Did you know that sodium Fluoride is also one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin Nerve Gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUORIDE) - (Yes, folks the same Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists released on a crowded Japanese subway train!). Let me repeat: the truth the American public needs to understand is the fact that Sodium Fluoride is nothing more (or less) than a hazardous waste by-product of the nuclear and aluminum industries. In addition to being the primary ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, it is also a main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic, and psychiatric drugs as well as military NERVE GAS! Why, oh why then is it allowed to be added to the toothpastes and drinking water of the American people?
Historically, this substance was quite expensive for the worlds' premier chemical companies to dispose of - but in the 50's and 60's - Alcoa and the entire aluminum industry - with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste - SOMEHOW sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison at a 20,000% markup and then injecting it into our water supply as well as into the nation's toothpastes and dental rinse. Yes that's right folks, a 20,000% markup. Consider also that when sodium Fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical literally 'goes down the drain' and voila - the chemical industry has not only a free hazardous waste disposal system - but we have also PAID them handsomely in the process!!
Independent scientific evidence over the past 50 plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens our life span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances, and most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one neat little package. There is increasing evidence that aluminum in the brain is a causative factor in Alzheimer's Disease, and evidence points towards sodium fluoride's strong affinity to 'bond' with this dangerous aluminum (remember it is a byproduct of aluminum manufacturing) and also it has the ability to 'trick' the blood-brain barrier by imitating the hydrogen ion thus allowing this chemical access to brain tissue.
Honest scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on sodium fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda campaign have consistently been given a large dose of professional 'black-listing' and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never have received the ink they deserve in the national press. Just follow the money to find the 'control' and you will find prominent American families to be prominent 'players' in the scandal. In 1952 a slick PR campaign rammed the concept of 'fluoridation' through our Public Health departments and various dental organizations. This slick campaign was more akin to a highly emotional "beer salesman convention" instead of the objective, scientifically researched program that it should have been. It has continued in the same vein right up to the present day - and now sodium fluoride use has now become 'usual and customary'.
To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. You need to ask yourself, "Is this particular response based on EMOTIONS born of TRADITION, or is it truly unbiased and based instead on thoroughly researched objectivity?" There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific "know-it-all" emotions attached to the topic of 'sodium fluoride' usage -but I personally have yet to find even ONE objective, double blind study that even remotely links sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE. Instead, I hear and read such blather as "9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend 'fluoride' toothpaste" etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly independent (unattached to moneyed vested interest groups) scientists who've spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been hit with a surprising amount of unfair character assassinations from strong vested-interest groups who reap grand profits from the public's ignorance as well as from their illnesses. (Just follow the money!)
Do you have diabetes and/or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 11 million people are at much higher risk drinking fluoridated water because they will receive a much deadlier dose because of their need for higher than normal water consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary means in which fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is eliminated from the body. Does it not make sense that these people shouldn't drink fluoridated water at all? Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients on dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively small amounts of SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the 'fluoridated' city water supply? Will adequate warnings be given to people with weak kidneys, or will the real cause of such deaths be 'covered up' in the name of 'domestic tranquility'?
Concerning the 'practice' of putting sodium fluoride into drinking water, where did this insanity begin and WHO tried it first? From personal research, the very first occurrence of purposefully putting sodium fluoride into drinking water was in the German ghettos and in Nazi Germany's infamous prison camps. The Gestapo you see had little concern about sodium fluoride's 'supposed' effect on children's teeth; instead, their reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to STERILIZE HUMANS and force the people in their concentration camps into calm, bovine, submission. (See for reference: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" written by Joseph Borkin.) Kind of shocking isn't it folks!! Ah, but it gets even better.
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from a research chemist by the name of Charles Perkins. He writes:
"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, "The Truth about Water Fluoridation", to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. In the 1930's Hitler and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient and cost-effective light lobotomy? --- Ott].
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty."
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go to Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plans to communize the world."
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine --- any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically."
Signed: CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October,1954.
Tarn Lass
Top journalist demonstrates why the BNP are more in touch with public opinion than Liebour.
Reggie Omar is a top journalist. Being a journalist and of Somali origin, one would expect him to be biased in favour of mass immigration but such is the strength of public opinion nowadays, even Mr Omar cannot hide the truth any longer.
His recent programme - Immigration: the inconvenient truth - began with Bradford writer - Richard North declaring he was a fan of the traditional gas lamp because they have a little cross bar near the top where he can visualise politicians and civil servants being hung along the side of the road for how they have brought the immigration invasion on this country without the consent of the British people. This comment is particularly sobering. Even the BNP would probably shy away from using such direct and blunt language in public. It certainly demonstrates the reality of ill feeling towards Labour politicians if professional writers are willing to say these things on TV!
During the programme, Mr Omar referred to some recent polls:
83% of all Britons feel that there is an immigration crisis.
66% of all Britons feel that their jobs are being undercut by migrant workers.
Note: The term "Briton" is actually used to define anybody currently living in the UK, not that they are British, so these will include the views of immigrants as well!
69% of Britons feel special treatment is given to migrants.
Note: These figures have been compiled by pro-multiculturalists!
But even more remarkably:
58% of IMMIGRANTS feel there is an immigration crisis!
40% of IMMIGRANTS feel second and third generation immigrants are given special treatment!
66% of IMMIGRANTS feel that immigration should be restricted or stopped!
Martin Hancock a social worker instantly demolished the Labour Lie that immigrants don't jump the housing queue. He said British families were upset when they say immigrants jumping the housing queue and that's why British people are voting for the BNP. Obviously, he must be confident in what he is saying if he wants to keep his job!
In conclusion, ask yourself this: Who is most representative of public opinion? Liebour or the BNP?
Who are the real fascists? Those that uphold public opinion or those that disregard it?
Mark Kaye
His recent programme - Immigration: the inconvenient truth - began with Bradford writer - Richard North declaring he was a fan of the traditional gas lamp because they have a little cross bar near the top where he can visualise politicians and civil servants being hung along the side of the road for how they have brought the immigration invasion on this country without the consent of the British people. This comment is particularly sobering. Even the BNP would probably shy away from using such direct and blunt language in public. It certainly demonstrates the reality of ill feeling towards Labour politicians if professional writers are willing to say these things on TV!
During the programme, Mr Omar referred to some recent polls:
83% of all Britons feel that there is an immigration crisis.
66% of all Britons feel that their jobs are being undercut by migrant workers.
Note: The term "Briton" is actually used to define anybody currently living in the UK, not that they are British, so these will include the views of immigrants as well!
69% of Britons feel special treatment is given to migrants.
Note: These figures have been compiled by pro-multiculturalists!
But even more remarkably:
58% of IMMIGRANTS feel there is an immigration crisis!
40% of IMMIGRANTS feel second and third generation immigrants are given special treatment!
66% of IMMIGRANTS feel that immigration should be restricted or stopped!
Martin Hancock a social worker instantly demolished the Labour Lie that immigrants don't jump the housing queue. He said British families were upset when they say immigrants jumping the housing queue and that's why British people are voting for the BNP. Obviously, he must be confident in what he is saying if he wants to keep his job!
In conclusion, ask yourself this: Who is most representative of public opinion? Liebour or the BNP?
Who are the real fascists? Those that uphold public opinion or those that disregard it?
Mark Kaye
The Guilty - Another great article from Paul Harris
.
As the proportion of third world immigrants and their descendents increases to become the majority of the population in Britain, the resulting problems will become so severe as to be undeniable, even by the most myopic self-deluded left wing intellectual sitting in his ivory tower. At some point the remaining indigenous British people who will have to live with these problems day after day will say to themselves “why was this done to us? – why was a civilised, orderly, prosperous, and relatively crime free society transformed into a chaotic, dismal hell-hole with rampant serious crime dominated by the backward medieval religion of Islam and vicious non-white criminal gangs"? The fantasy of a happy and harmonious multicultural society, which even today is being closely questioned, will by then be blatantly exposed as a pure and evil lie. The people will say to themselves “who brought this disastrous situation upon us"?
Unfortunately for the Establishment politicians and left wing zealots of the twentieth and twenty first century, there will be no hiding place and no excuses. They will not be able to say “we had no alternative, there was no option and we had to allow mass immigration”. They won’t be able to say “we didn’t realise that this would happen".
There have been right wing parties and politicians trying to warn the British people of the consequences since immigration from the third world began 60 years ago. Many books have been published over the years. And now with the internet there is a multiplicity of websites trying to alert the British people and the Western world to the impending disaster. Also throughout this period there has been several right wing political parties earnestly offering an alternative agenda. Do the Establishment politicians of today think that they will not be held accountable for their legacy to these future generations? Will their reputations remain wholesome and untarnished?
NOT A CHANCE OF IT!
People in fifty or sixty years time will still have access to the same right wing anti-immigration books that are available today, and to websites such as this one and they will say “why oh why were these people not listened to (that’s us in the BNP) - why did the British Establishment do their utmost to suppress their ideas - why couldn’t they see that they were so obviously right?” Then they will look closely at who the politicians were who imposed this dysfunctional society upon them – that’s our mainstream Establishment politicians of today. These politicians who grew up in the calm, orderly and civilised society created by the indigenous British people and bequeathed upon their descendents a chaotic, strife torn, basket case society composed of a jumble of incompatible people from every corner of the globe. You can be sure that the memory of these politicians will be hated and reviled with a vengeance.
So here is a message to these people who may be reading this article in the year 2060. Listed below are a few of the people who have brought this disaster upon you. Here are some of the people that you should be directing your hatred at. Spit on their graves because they were cowards and they were scum.
Margaret Thatcher (Prime Minister)
John Major (Prime Minister)
Tony Blair (Prime Minister)
Gordon Brown (Prime Minister)
Ken Livingstone (London Mayor)
Steve Houghton (Barnsley Labour Leader).
Unfortunately for the Establishment politicians and left wing zealots of the twentieth and twenty first century, there will be no hiding place and no excuses. They will not be able to say “we had no alternative, there was no option and we had to allow mass immigration”. They won’t be able to say “we didn’t realise that this would happen".
There have been right wing parties and politicians trying to warn the British people of the consequences since immigration from the third world began 60 years ago. Many books have been published over the years. And now with the internet there is a multiplicity of websites trying to alert the British people and the Western world to the impending disaster. Also throughout this period there has been several right wing political parties earnestly offering an alternative agenda. Do the Establishment politicians of today think that they will not be held accountable for their legacy to these future generations? Will their reputations remain wholesome and untarnished?
NOT A CHANCE OF IT!
People in fifty or sixty years time will still have access to the same right wing anti-immigration books that are available today, and to websites such as this one and they will say “why oh why were these people not listened to (that’s us in the BNP) - why did the British Establishment do their utmost to suppress their ideas - why couldn’t they see that they were so obviously right?” Then they will look closely at who the politicians were who imposed this dysfunctional society upon them – that’s our mainstream Establishment politicians of today. These politicians who grew up in the calm, orderly and civilised society created by the indigenous British people and bequeathed upon their descendents a chaotic, strife torn, basket case society composed of a jumble of incompatible people from every corner of the globe. You can be sure that the memory of these politicians will be hated and reviled with a vengeance.
So here is a message to these people who may be reading this article in the year 2060. Listed below are a few of the people who have brought this disaster upon you. Here are some of the people that you should be directing your hatred at. Spit on their graves because they were cowards and they were scum.
Margaret Thatcher (Prime Minister)
John Major (Prime Minister)
Tony Blair (Prime Minister)
Gordon Brown (Prime Minister)
Ken Livingstone (London Mayor)
Steve Houghton (Barnsley Labour Leader).
Whites Need Not Apply
Why should you support Labour when Labour does not support you?
Before Labour's racist anti-white labour laws, the best person for the job would
have got it.
These days, if you happen to be the wrong colour, you won't even get an interview.
What better proof do you need, that it is Labour who are the genuine racists?
What better excuse do you need to get out there and fight for your own rights for a change, by supporting and voting for the BNP?
Before Labour's racist anti-white labour laws, the best person for the job would
have got it.
These days, if you happen to be the wrong colour, you won't even get an interview.
What better proof do you need, that it is Labour who are the genuine racists?
What better excuse do you need to get out there and fight for your own rights for a change, by supporting and voting for the BNP?
2010 - A must read!!
This is an article about databases, (dozens of them), ID cards, surveillance, rights, liberty and social conditioning through state sponsored propaganda. It all comes together in 2010.
Imagine for a moment, that both the Government (NuLab) and the main opposition parties were all working together to the same ends, with either tacit support or complicity on the march towards 2010, because we don't see any official opposition to it.
Lets look at some evidence to support that theory. I want to make clear at this point that in quoting senior Nazi's in this article, is not to suggest that Brown's government is forming a Nazi government, but to show that he is using the same methods and tactics employed by 1930's Germany in order to achieve his goals.
In the modern context, if we begin from the basis that the War on Terror* is the Big Lie.
Then the continual news media bombardment for 10 years of the terror threat, high profile media frenzy arrests, spurious ministerial announcements, Home Office and Police leaks to the press, demonisation of young Muslims in much the same way that Stalin and Hitler used the lie of external enemies to secure their totalitarian regimes, we see that everything that has happened by way of legislation over the past 10 years has supposedly been driven by that lie. Big Lie is a propaganda technique in which the lie is so complex that the public will either dismiss it as impossible or choose not to believe it out of wilful ignorance. It was defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".
Indeed, the American Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler's psychological profile said: His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
If you believe as I do that this perfectly sums up UK Government over the past 10 years, then read on.
26,000 new laws, 3000 new criminal offences to stop what has been at best a very sporadic ineffective onslaught of terrorism in the UK. Virtually none of these new laws have been opposed during their passage through parliament. One can only therefore assume a degree of collusion in their passing through the house, as I cannot believe that opposition MP's were unaware of their content, implied and actual denial of freedoms and rights, nor struggled for any input into ensuring that many of the more draconian laws had safeguards built in to ensure they were never misused.
It is true that during this period, the Government have enjoyed a majority in Parliament, but that does not defer from my thoughts of collusion. Indeed it was a Tory ex whip who introduced the most damming legislation to silence those who want to know what is happening with his Freedom of Information amendment bill.
In order to maintain the lie, not only do you need to keep repeating it, but you also need to offer carrots from time to time, to ensure that the population believes that you are actually working for their benefit.
One of those smoke and mirror exercises was the expendable introduction of the Regional Assemblies throughout England. Although initially opposed, and in the pilot areas voted down, they were implemented at huge cost anyway, knowing that this would attract a good deal of public opposition, including token opposition from the Tories and Liberals. Finally you give the public what it wants by abolishing them, only to give the powers to the unelected RDA's, which had been set up quietly in the background. Joe Public never having been told about RDA's, they not getting any state approved media coverage, doesn't see them as a waste or unnecessary regulation body in the same way as the Regional Assemblies, and being satisfied that the Assemblies are now gone, doesn't realise that the powers that they wielded have not.
The carefully controlled media highlighted the abolition of the RA's, but gave little or no coverage to the RDA's.Smoke and Mirrors, job done.We have seen for a whole raft of Government projects with initial explanations and justifications, changes to those as campaigns were launched, changes again to suit the stories of the day, as the costs keep mounting and the juggernaut keeps rolling on.One of the largest of these projects is ID Cards. Again, this is a smoke and mirror exercise.
This project has attracted a good deal of public opposition, but so far we have only token political opposition from the Tories, who have promised to scrap the cards, and none from the Liberals. We unfortunately have not seen the same commitment for the underlying databases. In keeping with the Big Lie process, ID Cards are attracting a lot of interest. The costs keep mounting, the technology is unproven, the orders have not yet been placed. These are the headlines, but in the background lots of work has been going on, with the databases, but not the big single big brother database, something much worse, little brothers. The huge databases at the DWP, the DVLA and HMRC are to be linked to form the NIR, the National Identity Register. This is why the Gateway reviews on the ID Card project, and others, were ordered destroyed by the Treasury, and this is why the majority of the contractors working for the IT Consulting groups working on these projects are from the Indian sub continent. With the large part of the work now done, the rules for the Highly Skilled Migrant programme that brought those contractors here are now being changed, to force them home again. The Treasury and Gordon Brown need to hide the secretive nature of the work being undertaken until 2010.
The Cards themselves are expendable, just as the Regional Assemblies were, something to attract public opposition, backed by the token political opposition, but they are just the front end, they are politically expendable, thereby giving something back to the public when they are scrapped.Understand that it not the cards themselves that matter to this government, but the ability to gather, collate and use information. Information about you, your families, your possessions and income, in fact everything about your life, now and in the past. Information as any ex Stasi or KGB man will tell you, is power.
It will become apparent a little later why ID Cards are a smoke and mirror exercise.
In the years 2009 and 2010 all the major government IT projects will see the completion of some, and limited roll out of others but they all come together in 2010.
The ID cards 2009, (will come back to this)
The National Identity Register 2010,
Immigration Passport Service interrogation centres 2009,
The upgraded National DNA Database 2010,
The upgraded National Fingerprint Database 2009,
The Children's Fingerprint Database 2009,
The upgraded Police National Computer 2009,
All e-Passports 2009,
The National Number Plate Recognition System project 2009,
Employment systems 2009,
The enhanced Police National Computer/Interpol link system 2009,
MI5's Scope project 2010,
The Home Office C-Nomis project 2009,
The Children's Register Contactpoint 2009,
Imagine for a moment, that both the Government (NuLab) and the main opposition parties were all working together to the same ends, with either tacit support or complicity on the march towards 2010, because we don't see any official opposition to it.
Lets look at some evidence to support that theory. I want to make clear at this point that in quoting senior Nazi's in this article, is not to suggest that Brown's government is forming a Nazi government, but to show that he is using the same methods and tactics employed by 1930's Germany in order to achieve his goals.
In the modern context, if we begin from the basis that the War on Terror* is the Big Lie.
Then the continual news media bombardment for 10 years of the terror threat, high profile media frenzy arrests, spurious ministerial announcements, Home Office and Police leaks to the press, demonisation of young Muslims in much the same way that Stalin and Hitler used the lie of external enemies to secure their totalitarian regimes, we see that everything that has happened by way of legislation over the past 10 years has supposedly been driven by that lie. Big Lie is a propaganda technique in which the lie is so complex that the public will either dismiss it as impossible or choose not to believe it out of wilful ignorance. It was defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".
Indeed, the American Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler's psychological profile said: His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
If you believe as I do that this perfectly sums up UK Government over the past 10 years, then read on.
26,000 new laws, 3000 new criminal offences to stop what has been at best a very sporadic ineffective onslaught of terrorism in the UK. Virtually none of these new laws have been opposed during their passage through parliament. One can only therefore assume a degree of collusion in their passing through the house, as I cannot believe that opposition MP's were unaware of their content, implied and actual denial of freedoms and rights, nor struggled for any input into ensuring that many of the more draconian laws had safeguards built in to ensure they were never misused.
It is true that during this period, the Government have enjoyed a majority in Parliament, but that does not defer from my thoughts of collusion. Indeed it was a Tory ex whip who introduced the most damming legislation to silence those who want to know what is happening with his Freedom of Information amendment bill.
In order to maintain the lie, not only do you need to keep repeating it, but you also need to offer carrots from time to time, to ensure that the population believes that you are actually working for their benefit.
One of those smoke and mirror exercises was the expendable introduction of the Regional Assemblies throughout England. Although initially opposed, and in the pilot areas voted down, they were implemented at huge cost anyway, knowing that this would attract a good deal of public opposition, including token opposition from the Tories and Liberals. Finally you give the public what it wants by abolishing them, only to give the powers to the unelected RDA's, which had been set up quietly in the background. Joe Public never having been told about RDA's, they not getting any state approved media coverage, doesn't see them as a waste or unnecessary regulation body in the same way as the Regional Assemblies, and being satisfied that the Assemblies are now gone, doesn't realise that the powers that they wielded have not.
The carefully controlled media highlighted the abolition of the RA's, but gave little or no coverage to the RDA's.Smoke and Mirrors, job done.We have seen for a whole raft of Government projects with initial explanations and justifications, changes to those as campaigns were launched, changes again to suit the stories of the day, as the costs keep mounting and the juggernaut keeps rolling on.One of the largest of these projects is ID Cards. Again, this is a smoke and mirror exercise.
This project has attracted a good deal of public opposition, but so far we have only token political opposition from the Tories, who have promised to scrap the cards, and none from the Liberals. We unfortunately have not seen the same commitment for the underlying databases. In keeping with the Big Lie process, ID Cards are attracting a lot of interest. The costs keep mounting, the technology is unproven, the orders have not yet been placed. These are the headlines, but in the background lots of work has been going on, with the databases, but not the big single big brother database, something much worse, little brothers. The huge databases at the DWP, the DVLA and HMRC are to be linked to form the NIR, the National Identity Register. This is why the Gateway reviews on the ID Card project, and others, were ordered destroyed by the Treasury, and this is why the majority of the contractors working for the IT Consulting groups working on these projects are from the Indian sub continent. With the large part of the work now done, the rules for the Highly Skilled Migrant programme that brought those contractors here are now being changed, to force them home again. The Treasury and Gordon Brown need to hide the secretive nature of the work being undertaken until 2010.
The Cards themselves are expendable, just as the Regional Assemblies were, something to attract public opposition, backed by the token political opposition, but they are just the front end, they are politically expendable, thereby giving something back to the public when they are scrapped.Understand that it not the cards themselves that matter to this government, but the ability to gather, collate and use information. Information about you, your families, your possessions and income, in fact everything about your life, now and in the past. Information as any ex Stasi or KGB man will tell you, is power.
It will become apparent a little later why ID Cards are a smoke and mirror exercise.
In the years 2009 and 2010 all the major government IT projects will see the completion of some, and limited roll out of others but they all come together in 2010.
The ID cards 2009, (will come back to this)
The National Identity Register 2010,
Immigration Passport Service interrogation centres 2009,
The upgraded National DNA Database 2010,
The upgraded National Fingerprint Database 2009,
The Children's Fingerprint Database 2009,
The upgraded Police National Computer 2009,
All e-Passports 2009,
The National Number Plate Recognition System project 2009,
Employment systems 2009,
The enhanced Police National Computer/Interpol link system 2009,
MI5's Scope project 2010,
The Home Office C-Nomis project 2009,
The Children's Register Contactpoint 2009,
Terminal 5 at Heathrow 2009,
Phase II Home Information PackS 2010,
The e-borders system 2009,
The DWP Customer Information system 2009,
The NHS NPfIT 2010,
The European SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project 2009/2010
and many more unnamed or secret projects
This all happens at the same time as the final ratification of the European Constitution 2009, just before the European Parliament Elections 2009
Changes to the law to allow data sharing have made it possible for it all to come together in 2009/2010 to become one huge interactive database system. In 2010 it also joins up with the European systems.
Government have consistently argued their case that these system are necessary to fight crime, or terrorism, your right to employment and health care etc, and that the data will only be used for the initial purpose it is collected for, would never be shared, and that data one one system can never be used elsewhere.
On a one project at a time basis its easy to argue the lie, link them all together it is not so easy, and its use becomes much clearer. By linking these databases government now have a profile of you. Where you work, how much you earn, tax you pay, where you travel, how you travel, when you get sick, which doctor or hospital you use, what medication you receive, in short, what you cost to run vs what you earn for the state.
A modern day Europe wide electronic 'Doomsday Book'.
All the trappings of a totalitarian state.As Dizzy quite rightly elaborates:
What's important to point out here is this is not about saying you think Gordon Brown and the Labour Government are secretly trying to enslave us all in an Orwellian nightmare with the ultimate aim of destroying democracy. No, this is about asking whether the proposal passes the Stalin Test. Would someone like Stalin have found a system like this useful?
Just because today's politicians are not, or at least appear not to be, maniacal megalomaniacs, it does not mean that there won't be one in the future, and frankly it is naive to think that it can't happen. This means we should be exceptionally careful when we build the infrastructure of state that could so be easily used for purposes of political oppression.
And as one commenter in the Times stated:
I wondered how such gross authoritarian abuses could be coming about in modern Britain but then I looked up my MP. Lo and behold it turns out she received a Scottish West coast Catholic education, became a teacher and is now a minister in the Department of Work & Pensions. I particularly note that her 'other interests' include studying the social system of the former East Germany. Suddenly it all becomes depressingly clear. Jim, Cumbernauld.
Now I come back to the ID cards, the smoke and mirrors that this government is planning to employ. YES, they will scrap them, but only as they are presented to us now, so the anti card campaigns will wither and die on the vine, the Tories will be cock a hoop and say we won the argument for you.
Now look at your bank and credit cards. Then look at your families cards, and your friends and colleagues cards. They all expire in 2009 or 2010.
Government problems with the ID cards as presented are well documented, with their lack of expertise, so who better to issue and administer an ID card system for government, than the Banks.
When your bank and credit cards expire, in order to get new ones, or in fact any banking or financial services, you must first be on all the relevant databases or you will be denied the use of both government and financial services throughout Europe. The European SEPA project is looking for total harmonisation of electronic banking throughout Europe by 2010, but in the UK bank and bank issued credit cards will also double up as your ID Card. This had been agreed between banks and Treasury as far back as 2004, in conjunction with the National Smart Cards Project. (very quiet and low key)
When the new cards are introduced you won't be able to buy, rent or sell a house; buy, sell or lease a car; open a bank account or draw over £99 in cash from one; obtain a telephone landline, mobile phone or internet connection, visit a doctor, a hospital or buy anything at a pharmacy; or obtain a passport, without first obtaining permission via the ID card element.
You won't be able to get a job, temporary or permanent, as employers will demand them as they have to prove they are only employing eligible people, without first obtaining permission via the ID card element..
Further, the Home Secretary will be able to suspend or revoke your ID card whenever, for whatever reason, without any judicial oversight or right to appeal. It will become your provisional licence to live in the U.K., whether native or alien, which could be taken away at any time.
The consequences of this are clear. No bank card = no ID Card. No ID Card means no banking, no work, no benefits, no nothing.
That means you cannot pay bills, or your mortgage, run your car or travel. (the first iteration is being field tested now)
The number of debts that will mount as a result will be horrific. Government have already changed the law to allow debt collectors right of entry into your home without court orders.
The number of repossessions will rise dramatically as mortgages default, again the laws have been changed to make it easier to repossess, and as the number of dispossessed people rises, crime will also rise (which is why they wanted the cards and databases), so the numerous laws and new criminal offences are already in place to tackle that.
If the numbers and public anger gets out of hand, and people organise and riot, the laws are already in place for that too, with SOCA being able to act outside of judicial oversight, especially if rioters are reclassified as social terrorists, which is why they have been pushing for the 90 days internment so strongly. The new EU paramilitary police force European Gendarmerie Force (EGF) could also be used.
HIPS was introduced to ensure that there would be a database of all the homes in the UK. In order to buy loyalty, just as Hitler and Stalin did, giving repossessed homes to loyal party workers fulfilled their needs.
We were warned many years ago that the peoples of the western world would soon be herded, chipped and classified, and that it would all be run by governments and the banks. As part of the Big Lie it has always been fobbed off as conspiracy theory, a joke, ideas of the nutters. Somehow it doesn't seem so stupid now.
Now we have proof that credit cards are to be used for people tracking.
Those 26,000 new laws were never aimed at terrorists, they are aimed at you.!!
And don't expect the Tories or Liberals to help us out of this. Instead, ask the question why so many opposition front bencher's have got second jobs, most with financial institutions and banks.
But, I hear you cry, I haven't seen that on the telly. Would you honestly expect them to tell you that you are about to lose everything by using the biggest lie in the world, along with the distraction of the Global Warming scam.
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”- Joseph Goebbels
The other vital part of the Big Lie, the key component, was to ensure that the military was kept fully occupied, at full stretch and out of the UK during the entire time that this lie was being perpetrated.
So 2010 is the date that everything is coming together, and if you were thinking of getting out, moving to sunnier climes, think again because this not just happening in the UK, but also in Brussels, (strangely this database is now almost devoid of the hundreds of working papers that populated it only 3 months ago) in Paris, (French entry missing) Berlin,(Germany's ID Card documentation is also missing), Rome, (and Italy and Belgium) Strasbourg, in Washington, in Montreal, in Delhi, Canberra and Tokyo.
They are all working together towards a brave new world, beginning in 2010.
Same time as the North American Union or Mexamericanada
http://www.thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/
Phase II Home Information PackS 2010,
The e-borders system 2009,
The DWP Customer Information system 2009,
The NHS NPfIT 2010,
The European SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project 2009/2010
and many more unnamed or secret projects
This all happens at the same time as the final ratification of the European Constitution 2009, just before the European Parliament Elections 2009
Changes to the law to allow data sharing have made it possible for it all to come together in 2009/2010 to become one huge interactive database system. In 2010 it also joins up with the European systems.
Government have consistently argued their case that these system are necessary to fight crime, or terrorism, your right to employment and health care etc, and that the data will only be used for the initial purpose it is collected for, would never be shared, and that data one one system can never be used elsewhere.
On a one project at a time basis its easy to argue the lie, link them all together it is not so easy, and its use becomes much clearer. By linking these databases government now have a profile of you. Where you work, how much you earn, tax you pay, where you travel, how you travel, when you get sick, which doctor or hospital you use, what medication you receive, in short, what you cost to run vs what you earn for the state.
A modern day Europe wide electronic 'Doomsday Book'.
All the trappings of a totalitarian state.As Dizzy quite rightly elaborates:
What's important to point out here is this is not about saying you think Gordon Brown and the Labour Government are secretly trying to enslave us all in an Orwellian nightmare with the ultimate aim of destroying democracy. No, this is about asking whether the proposal passes the Stalin Test. Would someone like Stalin have found a system like this useful?
Just because today's politicians are not, or at least appear not to be, maniacal megalomaniacs, it does not mean that there won't be one in the future, and frankly it is naive to think that it can't happen. This means we should be exceptionally careful when we build the infrastructure of state that could so be easily used for purposes of political oppression.
And as one commenter in the Times stated:
I wondered how such gross authoritarian abuses could be coming about in modern Britain but then I looked up my MP. Lo and behold it turns out she received a Scottish West coast Catholic education, became a teacher and is now a minister in the Department of Work & Pensions. I particularly note that her 'other interests' include studying the social system of the former East Germany. Suddenly it all becomes depressingly clear. Jim, Cumbernauld.
Now I come back to the ID cards, the smoke and mirrors that this government is planning to employ. YES, they will scrap them, but only as they are presented to us now, so the anti card campaigns will wither and die on the vine, the Tories will be cock a hoop and say we won the argument for you.
Now look at your bank and credit cards. Then look at your families cards, and your friends and colleagues cards. They all expire in 2009 or 2010.
Government problems with the ID cards as presented are well documented, with their lack of expertise, so who better to issue and administer an ID card system for government, than the Banks.
When your bank and credit cards expire, in order to get new ones, or in fact any banking or financial services, you must first be on all the relevant databases or you will be denied the use of both government and financial services throughout Europe. The European SEPA project is looking for total harmonisation of electronic banking throughout Europe by 2010, but in the UK bank and bank issued credit cards will also double up as your ID Card. This had been agreed between banks and Treasury as far back as 2004, in conjunction with the National Smart Cards Project. (very quiet and low key)
When the new cards are introduced you won't be able to buy, rent or sell a house; buy, sell or lease a car; open a bank account or draw over £99 in cash from one; obtain a telephone landline, mobile phone or internet connection, visit a doctor, a hospital or buy anything at a pharmacy; or obtain a passport, without first obtaining permission via the ID card element.
You won't be able to get a job, temporary or permanent, as employers will demand them as they have to prove they are only employing eligible people, without first obtaining permission via the ID card element..
Further, the Home Secretary will be able to suspend or revoke your ID card whenever, for whatever reason, without any judicial oversight or right to appeal. It will become your provisional licence to live in the U.K., whether native or alien, which could be taken away at any time.
The consequences of this are clear. No bank card = no ID Card. No ID Card means no banking, no work, no benefits, no nothing.
That means you cannot pay bills, or your mortgage, run your car or travel. (the first iteration is being field tested now)
The number of debts that will mount as a result will be horrific. Government have already changed the law to allow debt collectors right of entry into your home without court orders.
The number of repossessions will rise dramatically as mortgages default, again the laws have been changed to make it easier to repossess, and as the number of dispossessed people rises, crime will also rise (which is why they wanted the cards and databases), so the numerous laws and new criminal offences are already in place to tackle that.
If the numbers and public anger gets out of hand, and people organise and riot, the laws are already in place for that too, with SOCA being able to act outside of judicial oversight, especially if rioters are reclassified as social terrorists, which is why they have been pushing for the 90 days internment so strongly. The new EU paramilitary police force European Gendarmerie Force (EGF) could also be used.
HIPS was introduced to ensure that there would be a database of all the homes in the UK. In order to buy loyalty, just as Hitler and Stalin did, giving repossessed homes to loyal party workers fulfilled their needs.
We were warned many years ago that the peoples of the western world would soon be herded, chipped and classified, and that it would all be run by governments and the banks. As part of the Big Lie it has always been fobbed off as conspiracy theory, a joke, ideas of the nutters. Somehow it doesn't seem so stupid now.
Now we have proof that credit cards are to be used for people tracking.
Those 26,000 new laws were never aimed at terrorists, they are aimed at you.!!
And don't expect the Tories or Liberals to help us out of this. Instead, ask the question why so many opposition front bencher's have got second jobs, most with financial institutions and banks.
But, I hear you cry, I haven't seen that on the telly. Would you honestly expect them to tell you that you are about to lose everything by using the biggest lie in the world, along with the distraction of the Global Warming scam.
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”- Joseph Goebbels
The other vital part of the Big Lie, the key component, was to ensure that the military was kept fully occupied, at full stretch and out of the UK during the entire time that this lie was being perpetrated.
So 2010 is the date that everything is coming together, and if you were thinking of getting out, moving to sunnier climes, think again because this not just happening in the UK, but also in Brussels, (strangely this database is now almost devoid of the hundreds of working papers that populated it only 3 months ago) in Paris, (French entry missing) Berlin,(Germany's ID Card documentation is also missing), Rome, (and Italy and Belgium) Strasbourg, in Washington, in Montreal, in Delhi, Canberra and Tokyo.
They are all working together towards a brave new world, beginning in 2010.
Same time as the North American Union or Mexamericanada
http://www.thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/
How the hell did we get into this mess?
The Observer picks up on the latest developments in the situation in Italy - not a happy picture, where there has been a vicious attack on Romanians by masked Italians.Over in the Independent on Sunday we get a picture of the effect of mass immigration on the Lincolnshire town of Boston. Again it is not a happy picture – a town no longer at ease with itself.
Meanwhile, The Times takes up the issue of the number of immigrant workers in the UK, offering revised statistics which suggest that not 52 percent but more than 80 percent of the jobs created in the past 10 years have gone to foreigners.
The figures also show that in the past five years the number of foreigners in work in Britain has risen by nearly one million, while employment among the UK-born population has dropped by almost 500,000.
The number of foreign-born workers in Britain rose from 1.904 million in mid-1997 to 3.269 million in the middle of this year, an increase of 1.365 million. Over the same period, there was a rise in working-age employment among UK-born people from 23.638 million to 23.948 million, a rise of just 310,000. Since 2002 the number of foreigners working in Britain has climbed by 964,000 while UK-born employment has dropped by 478,000.In a leader that mirrors my co-editor's piece, however, the paper's leader notes that the willingness of employers to take on foreign labour is a reflection of our dire education system.
This has produced an "underclass", where a conservatively estimated 10 percent of young people are "Neets": not in education, employment or training. "Faced with the choice between an unreliable, unskilled and unqualified British 17-year-old and an enthusiastic and skilled eastern European, probably speaking better English, whom would you employ?" the paper asks. We have created a "lost generation" of young people.
How the hell did we get into this mess?
Veronica
Convert to Christianity and Guarantee your asylum!
This is yet another classic example why nobody believes Labour and their claims that they are successfully deporting bogus asylum seekers.
Apparently this latest specimen from Iran escaped police custody, so we can safely assume he has some kind of criminal record - for what, is not exactly clear but the press silence over this makes it look all the more suspicious.
Yes another criminal is just the type of "enrichment" that we Barnsley folk need!
Wait for it...
That's why they have both decided to have their photos taken and their stories covered, including where they reside published in the press for the entire world to see!
Local Labour MP Eric Illsley is disregarding the professional judgements of immigration officials and thinks their stories are credible!
Apparently this latest specimen from Iran escaped police custody, so we can safely assume he has some kind of criminal record - for what, is not exactly clear but the press silence over this makes it look all the more suspicious.
Yes another criminal is just the type of "enrichment" that we Barnsley folk need!
Another point of interest is that he also worked for LBD bakeries until he was made redundant - this despite the fact that asylum seekers have no right to work here until they are granted asylum! Again note: Labour's tough stance on clamping down on the employment of illegals by doing nothing!
Now he has met a girl, his girlfriend however is really worried about other Muslims finding out that he has converted to Christianity in case he gets killed, so now he cannot go back to where he came from.
Yes...
Now he has met a girl, his girlfriend however is really worried about other Muslims finding out that he has converted to Christianity in case he gets killed, so now he cannot go back to where he came from.
Yes...
Wait for it...
That's why they have both decided to have their photos taken and their stories covered, including where they reside published in the press for the entire world to see!
Local Labour MP Eric Illsley is disregarding the professional judgements of immigration officials and thinks their stories are credible!
Click image to enlarge..
Latest job cuts at "Hidiously White" Al Beeb
Another great article from Mark Kaye
Whilst I don't usually revel in folks loosing their jobs, I couldn't help raise the corners of my mouth when I saw the front page of the Daily Mail last night. The "Hideously White" BBC, as former director general Gregg Dyke described it, is set to close the Television Centre and axe yet more jobs because it arrogantly thought the government were going to raise the licence fee more than it did. In true Beeb style, the Beeb now claims it will have to put on even more repeats and further reduce the number of factual documentaries, this in spite of the fact that it blows most of the loot it collects from the licence payer on providing multilingual programs for other countries at our expense! Of course if you are like me and don't have a TV licence, preferring instead, to make other arrangements for my visual entertainment such as joining a video club and playing pre-recorded media through a DVD player that has no capacity to receive TV signals, then the prospect of even more celebrity TV crap doesn't really bother me one iota!.
This institution has been instrumental in brainwashing our once proud and civilised society in the 1950's, prepared to fight to the death to protect our civil liberties, to a nation of snivelling wretches, too scared to make a "politically incorrect" comment and who are more interested in being glued to tripe TV like as EastEnders and Embarrassing Illnesses than they are in taking an interest in the reality of what is happening outside their own front door.
Why should the Beeb be propped up by the licence fee? Why should they be allowed to deny non licence payers the right to receive independent television in the digital age of choice? It is about time they were made to compete on an equal footing with all the other media and if more and more people pulled the plug on the Beeb like I did two years ago, if only for a few months, then our nation would be rid of this poisoned chalice for ever!
Mark Kaye
Whilst I don't usually revel in folks loosing their jobs, I couldn't help raise the corners of my mouth when I saw the front page of the Daily Mail last night. The "Hideously White" BBC, as former director general Gregg Dyke described it, is set to close the Television Centre and axe yet more jobs because it arrogantly thought the government were going to raise the licence fee more than it did. In true Beeb style, the Beeb now claims it will have to put on even more repeats and further reduce the number of factual documentaries, this in spite of the fact that it blows most of the loot it collects from the licence payer on providing multilingual programs for other countries at our expense! Of course if you are like me and don't have a TV licence, preferring instead, to make other arrangements for my visual entertainment such as joining a video club and playing pre-recorded media through a DVD player that has no capacity to receive TV signals, then the prospect of even more celebrity TV crap doesn't really bother me one iota!.
This institution has been instrumental in brainwashing our once proud and civilised society in the 1950's, prepared to fight to the death to protect our civil liberties, to a nation of snivelling wretches, too scared to make a "politically incorrect" comment and who are more interested in being glued to tripe TV like as EastEnders and Embarrassing Illnesses than they are in taking an interest in the reality of what is happening outside their own front door.
Why should the Beeb be propped up by the licence fee? Why should they be allowed to deny non licence payers the right to receive independent television in the digital age of choice? It is about time they were made to compete on an equal footing with all the other media and if more and more people pulled the plug on the Beeb like I did two years ago, if only for a few months, then our nation would be rid of this poisoned chalice for ever!
Mark Kaye
Police drop in session - A COP OUT!
Barnsley police held a "drop in" session on Thursday at Barnsley District General Hospital from 2 – 5 pm. The purpose was to give the public the opportunity to feedback on current community policing practises. It does not take a marketing expert to realise the utter foolishness of this venue which is why most soap powder manufacturers have their customer surveyors mingling with shoppers on a weekend in the town centre. Why anybody would choose to attend a venue that is completely out of the way, notoriously difficult and expensive to park and at times which discriminates against working people is difficult to conceive. Wait a minute! Perhaps this is the reason! Maybe if no one turns up then maybe the bureaucratic empire builders who have replaced operational police officers can claim to have carried out a customer satisfaction exercise without having to fill in too many boxes that hopelessly embarrass their useless politically correct top brass! The top brass who have yielded without so much as protest at the police force (or service as it is known to the politically correct) being turned from a once respected institution to the useless politically correct joke that spends more of its energy persecuting honourable law abiding citizens who are sick and tired at the lack of police effectiveness in dealing with criminals than it does in actually scarring the hell out of the criminals! How frustrating this must feel for ordinary front line coppers who have to work with their hands tied behind their backs whilst following orders. THERE'S NO WONDER MOST OF THE GOOD ONES HAVE LEFT OR ARE STILL LEAVING IN DROVES! Barnsley tax payers ought to be examining their council tax bills to find out what last year's massive 5% increase bought them! The answer is a reduction of 95 uniformed police officers between 2005 and 2006 at the same time as pen pushers and bureaucrats were increased by 177! It's about time we stood up and shouted louder than the criminals for our rights for a change and its about time we gave the politically correct politicians who have inflicted this evil on our people a good kick in the teeth by making a pledge to support the only party who have the guts to reverse this degradation, the BNP and making DAMN SURE WE HONOUR THAT PLEDGE!
Mark Kaye
Mark Kaye
JIHADISTS WANT OUR KIDS - DEAD OR ALIVE!!!
The primary objective of all Muslims is to spread Islam throughout the globe by whatever means may be necessary, including lying and killing. Killing kuffars (unbelievers) who resist Islam is not a sin, in fact it is the only sure way of attaining paradise. Kuffars who do not resist must be either enslaved (dhimmis) or converted to Islam.
...
So, with the current Jihad in the West, how does this Islamic program of killing/enslavement/conversion apply to kuffar kids?
...
KILLING:
...
The first wave of attacks in the present Jihad mostly killed adults, though there were a few children incinerated on the 9/11 flights. It was only with the deliberate torturing and killing of kuffar children at Beslan that the civilised world realised that Muslims worship Allah in the same way that the abominators worshipped Moloch. In addition, many of the Beslan children were humiliated by being raped and forced to drink their own urine before being killed. Humiliation of the kuffar is very important in Islam.
...
Muslim theologians have called for the sacrifice of 2 million American children to Allah, and recent events in Scotland seem to show that children in the U.K. are also prime targets for attack. Jihadists tortured, castrated and murdered a fifteen year old , and the failed Glasgow airport attack was timed for the first day of the school holidays with the obvious intention of burning as many families as possible.
...
It is rather disconcerting to realise that this attack appears to have been carried out by doctors, especially as the Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association are on record as stating that their duty of care does not extend to kuffars.
...
In summary: a jihadist who believes that killing kuffars will get him to Allah's bordello in the sky doesn't care whether his victims are men, women or children. All kuffar human-sacrifices are equally pleasing to Allah.
...
SUBJUGATION:
...
The Islamic abduction, rape and sexual subjugation of young kuffar girls may be new to our generation with the comparatively recent cultural enrichment of our cities, but this typical Muslim practice goes back into history, and the West has suffered from it before.
...
Of course every culture produces child molesters, but in non-Muslim societies these are usually isolated loners. In contrast, Muslim paedophiles are well-organised and these predators often hunt their prey in rape-gangs in a tradition of Muslim razzia going back to the 'prophet'. The reason for this cultural difference is that paedophilia and rape are abhorrent in civilised societies, but are socially acceptable to Muslims because they are dutifully following Mohammed's example.
...
CONVERSION:
...
As well as being after our children's bodies, either as burned and mangled sacrifices to Allah or living sex-slaves, they are also determined to brainwash our children's minds with their vile cult. A favourite trick is 'role playing' to indoctrinate young children to think of themselves as Muslims.
....
In addition, there is an insidious program to destroy our children's cultural heritage , with attempts to abolish festivals loved by generations of kuffar children and put Islamic events in their place.
...
British Muslims are demanding a ban within state schools on music, dance, drama, biology, swimming and lessons about any other religion but Islam. There are also to be compulsory history lessons about the 'massive contribution that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation'. In fact, Islamic culture is so backward that Muslims are incapable of bringing anything new to the West. The West has long ago moved on from its medieval phase and few citizens of Western countries (apart from immigrant Muslims) would want to return to it. All the things that Muslims have brought to our civilisation are negative and barbaric. However, don't expect historical accuracy to stand in the way of implementing a politically correct curriculum.
....
So, unless present trends can be reversed, the only foreseeable future for our children will be death, dhimmitude or conversion.
.
UPDATE: 16th December 2008 The BNP reported THIS
.
Najistani
Socialism?
The British National Party has always faced opposition from people on the left wing of politics. These people believe in one world – all races and faiths living together in peace and harmony. However this is only their latest fixation. Before this came their obsession with the working class. They saw the working class as facing exploitation from the bosses and owners of the industries in which they worked. They saw themselves as heroes in the roll of fighting for decent wages and conditions against the cruel might of capitalism.
But now they appear to have completely dropped their support of the working class in exchange for their support of immigrants and the ethnic minorities. In fact their new position is in direct opposition to their old position. They are now on the bosses and owners side AGAINST the working class. For is it not true that the bosses and owners will readily employ an immigrant at a lower rate than a British working class person, thus undercutting the wage levels of the British worker, or even leaving him on the dole. Is it not true that the British working class is in direct competition with the immigrant and ethnic minority person for housing and employment, where the middle and upper classes are not.
This tells us something about the character of the socialist person. It tells us that the socialist is basically a weak willed person who needs to keep bolstering his own self image by casting himself in the roll of hero of the underdog. How can these people jump ships so readily and brazenly? The reason is that they are either totally dishonest or totally detached from reality.
This is in direct contrast to a member of an anti-immigration party such as the BNP. Members of the BNP absolutely must be strong willed and determined in order to stand up to the unrelenting attacks from the Establishment. They need to be firmly based in reality to justify their own beleaguered position.
Paul Harris
But now they appear to have completely dropped their support of the working class in exchange for their support of immigrants and the ethnic minorities. In fact their new position is in direct opposition to their old position. They are now on the bosses and owners side AGAINST the working class. For is it not true that the bosses and owners will readily employ an immigrant at a lower rate than a British working class person, thus undercutting the wage levels of the British worker, or even leaving him on the dole. Is it not true that the British working class is in direct competition with the immigrant and ethnic minority person for housing and employment, where the middle and upper classes are not.
This tells us something about the character of the socialist person. It tells us that the socialist is basically a weak willed person who needs to keep bolstering his own self image by casting himself in the roll of hero of the underdog. How can these people jump ships so readily and brazenly? The reason is that they are either totally dishonest or totally detached from reality.
This is in direct contrast to a member of an anti-immigration party such as the BNP. Members of the BNP absolutely must be strong willed and determined in order to stand up to the unrelenting attacks from the Establishment. They need to be firmly based in reality to justify their own beleaguered position.
Paul Harris
Noah and the Ark
In the year 2007 the Lord came unto Noah, who was now living in England
and said, "Once again, the earth has become wicked and over-populated,
and I see the end of all flesh before me. Build another Ark and save two
of every living thing along with a few good humans."
He gave Noah the CATIA drawings, saying, "You have 6 months to build the
Ark before I will start the unending rain for 40 days and 40 nights."
Six months later, the Lord looked down and saw Noah weeping in his yard
but no Ark. Noah!" He roared, "I'm about to start the rain! Where is the
Ark?"
"Forgive me, Lord," begged Noah, "but things have changed.
I needed Building Regulations Approval and I've been arguing with the
Fire Brigade about the need for a sprinkler system.
My neighbours claim that I should have obtained planning permission for
building the Ark in my garden because it is development of the site,
even though in my view it is a temporary structure.
We had to then go to appeal to the Secretary of State for a decision.
Then the Department of Transport demanded a bond be posted for the
future costs of moving power lines and other overhead obstructions to
clear the passage for the Ark 's move to the sea. I told them that the
sea would be coming to us, but they would hear nothing of it.
Getting the wood was another problem. All the decent trees have Tree
Preservation Orders on them and we live in a Site of Special Scientific
Interest set up in order to protect the spotted owl. I tried to convince
the environmentalists that I needed the wood to save the owls - but no
go!
When I started gathering the animals, the RSPCA sued me. They insisted
that I was confining wild animals against their will. They argued the
accommodation was too restrictive, and it was cruel and inhumane to put
so many animals in a confined space.
Then the County Council, the Environment Agency and the Rivers Authority
ruled that I couldn't build the Ark until they'd conducted an
environmental impact study on your proposed flood.
I'm still trying to resolve a complaint with the Equal Opportunities
Commission on how many disabled carpenter's I'm supposed to hire for my
building team. The trades unions say I can't use my sons. They insist I
have to hire only accredited workers with Ark-building experience.
To make matters worse, Customs and Excise seized all my assets, claiming
I'm trying to leave the country illegally with endangered species.
So, forgive me, Lord, but it would take at least 10 years for me to
finish this Ark. "
Suddenly the skies cleared, the sun began to shine, and a rainbow
stretched across the sky.
Noah looked up in wonder and asked, "You mean you're not going to
destroy the world?"
"No," said the Lord. "The British government beat me to it."
and said, "Once again, the earth has become wicked and over-populated,
and I see the end of all flesh before me. Build another Ark and save two
of every living thing along with a few good humans."
He gave Noah the CATIA drawings, saying, "You have 6 months to build the
Ark before I will start the unending rain for 40 days and 40 nights."
Six months later, the Lord looked down and saw Noah weeping in his yard
but no Ark. Noah!" He roared, "I'm about to start the rain! Where is the
Ark?"
"Forgive me, Lord," begged Noah, "but things have changed.
I needed Building Regulations Approval and I've been arguing with the
Fire Brigade about the need for a sprinkler system.
My neighbours claim that I should have obtained planning permission for
building the Ark in my garden because it is development of the site,
even though in my view it is a temporary structure.
We had to then go to appeal to the Secretary of State for a decision.
Then the Department of Transport demanded a bond be posted for the
future costs of moving power lines and other overhead obstructions to
clear the passage for the Ark 's move to the sea. I told them that the
sea would be coming to us, but they would hear nothing of it.
Getting the wood was another problem. All the decent trees have Tree
Preservation Orders on them and we live in a Site of Special Scientific
Interest set up in order to protect the spotted owl. I tried to convince
the environmentalists that I needed the wood to save the owls - but no
go!
When I started gathering the animals, the RSPCA sued me. They insisted
that I was confining wild animals against their will. They argued the
accommodation was too restrictive, and it was cruel and inhumane to put
so many animals in a confined space.
Then the County Council, the Environment Agency and the Rivers Authority
ruled that I couldn't build the Ark until they'd conducted an
environmental impact study on your proposed flood.
I'm still trying to resolve a complaint with the Equal Opportunities
Commission on how many disabled carpenter's I'm supposed to hire for my
building team. The trades unions say I can't use my sons. They insist I
have to hire only accredited workers with Ark-building experience.
To make matters worse, Customs and Excise seized all my assets, claiming
I'm trying to leave the country illegally with endangered species.
So, forgive me, Lord, but it would take at least 10 years for me to
finish this Ark. "
Suddenly the skies cleared, the sun began to shine, and a rainbow
stretched across the sky.
Noah looked up in wonder and asked, "You mean you're not going to
destroy the world?"
"No," said the Lord. "The British government beat me to it."
Channel 4's Mosque program
Mark Kaye responded to THIS article.
Some very serious questions indeed need to be answered regarding police independence in the face of their bizarre decision to turn the tables on the broadcasters of Channel 4's Undercover Mosque programme.
Firstly, if the footage seen of mad mullahs preaching death to unbelievers and homosexuals was completely made up then surely the police and the CPS would have had grounds to arrest the programme makers and charge them with the falsely reporting crimes, wasting police time and inciting race/religious hatred. In the case of a woman falsely reporting a rape, then this would have undoubtedly have happened.
Secondly, if the footage had been made up, then surely these preachers would now be running to their solicitors to file a case for liable against Channel 4 in the certain knowledge that their booty would be guaranteed. None of this has happened. Instead, by referring the "evidence" to a secret body called the broadcasting watchdog, the public will never get to see the unedited footage or listen to the "evidence." The watchdog hasn't got the independence of a court and they will act as Judge, Jury and Executioner on the programme makers in complete privacy. The police have obviously "copped" out of this case just like they did in the cash for peerages case because their high ranking Police Chief Officers, who are nothing more than left-wing politicians in uniform, have formed such good friendships with the Labour Party. The trial of BNP leader Nick Griffin and Mark Collett demonstrates this perfectly. Whilst the case had many similarities with regards the points of law breeched, the edited footage seen by the public showed no indication of incitement to commit acts of violence, yet the police and the CPS tried twice to prosecute. Even when the case was thrown out the second time by a jury, senior politicians including the now Prime Minister Gordon Brown were heard making criticisms of the jury's decision and how the law needed "tightening up." The whole thing stinks of political interference and the Labour party's determination to apply the law differently to different people.
Britain used to be renowned has having the fairest justice system in the world. This case is just another nail in the coffin that represents just how corrupt and unfair it has become. The case has also exposed the hypocrisy of all these left-wing and neo-liberal idiots who have suddenly jumped on this bandwagon. Disgraced George Galloway MP was heard on the radio this morning trying to re-enforce credibility for his views by claiming they were now endorsed by the CPS and the Police. Well, all that can be said about this George is that the CPS has already fully established itself as a joke organisation that is committed to the goal of protecting criminals and humiliating their victims. As for the police, is this the same police force that you have so loudly claim is institutionally racist for stopping and searching too many black people?
Mark Kaye
Some very serious questions indeed need to be answered regarding police independence in the face of their bizarre decision to turn the tables on the broadcasters of Channel 4's Undercover Mosque programme.
Firstly, if the footage seen of mad mullahs preaching death to unbelievers and homosexuals was completely made up then surely the police and the CPS would have had grounds to arrest the programme makers and charge them with the falsely reporting crimes, wasting police time and inciting race/religious hatred. In the case of a woman falsely reporting a rape, then this would have undoubtedly have happened.
Secondly, if the footage had been made up, then surely these preachers would now be running to their solicitors to file a case for liable against Channel 4 in the certain knowledge that their booty would be guaranteed. None of this has happened. Instead, by referring the "evidence" to a secret body called the broadcasting watchdog, the public will never get to see the unedited footage or listen to the "evidence." The watchdog hasn't got the independence of a court and they will act as Judge, Jury and Executioner on the programme makers in complete privacy. The police have obviously "copped" out of this case just like they did in the cash for peerages case because their high ranking Police Chief Officers, who are nothing more than left-wing politicians in uniform, have formed such good friendships with the Labour Party. The trial of BNP leader Nick Griffin and Mark Collett demonstrates this perfectly. Whilst the case had many similarities with regards the points of law breeched, the edited footage seen by the public showed no indication of incitement to commit acts of violence, yet the police and the CPS tried twice to prosecute. Even when the case was thrown out the second time by a jury, senior politicians including the now Prime Minister Gordon Brown were heard making criticisms of the jury's decision and how the law needed "tightening up." The whole thing stinks of political interference and the Labour party's determination to apply the law differently to different people.
Britain used to be renowned has having the fairest justice system in the world. This case is just another nail in the coffin that represents just how corrupt and unfair it has become. The case has also exposed the hypocrisy of all these left-wing and neo-liberal idiots who have suddenly jumped on this bandwagon. Disgraced George Galloway MP was heard on the radio this morning trying to re-enforce credibility for his views by claiming they were now endorsed by the CPS and the Police. Well, all that can be said about this George is that the CPS has already fully established itself as a joke organisation that is committed to the goal of protecting criminals and humiliating their victims. As for the police, is this the same police force that you have so loudly claim is institutionally racist for stopping and searching too many black people?
Mark Kaye
WRONG KIND OF WHITE
Mark Kaye sent this amazing story to us. You couldn’t make this stuff up!!A Teenage science student has been banned from applying for a training programme with the Environment Agency because she is English and white. The recruitment agency handling the scheme told Abigail Howarth, 18, that there was no point in her applying because of her ethnic background. Abigail wrote back to the agency in disbelief and three days later she received a letter from the agencies recruitment officer, Bola Odusi telling her that the training programme was targeted at ethnic minorities only. Apparently the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) is investigating this case of anti-white discrimination but being as the CRE is largely responsible for initiating the legislation that encourages employers to discriminate against whites, its a little bit like placing a pint of beer in front of an alcoholic and asking him not to drink it. This type of anti-white discrimination by New Labour is remarkably similar to the Nuremburg Laws of Nazi Germany in the 1930's. Whereas the Nazis banned Jews from applying to work in government departments, New Labour are banning white people from applying to work in government departments. Surely most people agree with the BNP in that the best person for the job should be working in the government department!
Prison Works
..
It often said by liberal and left-wing criminal luvvies that prison does not work. Of course it works. Only an idiot would say otherwise. It works because whilst criminals are locked up in prison they can't go out and commit crime! Even a three year old can understand that! Unfortunately our prisons are full because the liberal lefties have shortened sentencing to the point where prison has become a temporary inconvenience rather than a harsh deterrent. As a result, crime has exploded and with it too, the prison population. Now prisoners enjoy better access to healthcare than the general population and are even given free "safe syringes" with which to participate in their illegal drug activities. They do not have to work to earn their living and they are treated to all the modern conveniences such as radio and TV. Prisoners are so well looked after these days that it costs of over £60,000 per year just to keep one of them there - over three times more than most people take home in their pay.
If prisoner’s sentences were increased to reflect the severity of their crimes then the prison population would actually fall. And for those repeat offenders like violent muggers, burglars and car thieves who don't change their ways and have been misled to believe that that society owes them something, I'm afraid the death penalty is the only remedy. Yes, I can just imagine it now. All those liberal lefties frothing at the mouth in shock and horror at the thought that I would like to see these people removed from our society on a permanent basis so that the rest of us can get on with our lives in piece. What a pity these sick and twisted liberal lefties don't show one tenth of this concern when an old aged pensioner is shot or when a young toddler is mown down by some drug induced car thief just outside their own front door.
If prisoner’s sentences were increased to reflect the severity of their crimes then the prison population would actually fall. And for those repeat offenders like violent muggers, burglars and car thieves who don't change their ways and have been misled to believe that that society owes them something, I'm afraid the death penalty is the only remedy. Yes, I can just imagine it now. All those liberal lefties frothing at the mouth in shock and horror at the thought that I would like to see these people removed from our society on a permanent basis so that the rest of us can get on with our lives in piece. What a pity these sick and twisted liberal lefties don't show one tenth of this concern when an old aged pensioner is shot or when a young toddler is mown down by some drug induced car thief just outside their own front door.
Mark Kaye
You couldn't make up such an idiotic situation if you tried!
Imagine the following scenario: A group of policemen witness a violent
unprovoked murder of a man outside his home. The murderer is still standing
around when the wife of the man opens the door and shouts some insults to
the murderer. The group of policemen arrest and charge the woman to appear
in court on public order offences. The murderer walks away free, threatening
to kill even more people.
Sounds absurd? Well consider this:
In July 2005 Muslim terrorists murdered over 50 people in London and seriously injured many others. Two weeks later, they tried again. Thousands of Muslim crackpots where subsequently seen on TV marching the streets of London in support the terrorist atrocities. Only two were arrested and tried. Meanwhile, Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP was arrested and tried twice for insulting Muslim extremists and for warning that they were plotting terrorist attacks. To make matters even more absurd the police introduced a policy of dismissing officers who are members of the BNP, a legally registered, peaceful and democratic political party. Yet in response to recent revelations by MI5 that up to eight police officers are suspected of having links with Al Qaeda the police have said that the suspected jihadists have not even been suspended because they claim that the police do not have the legal power to suspend or dismiss them! One suspected jihadist officer working in the South East has been allowed to keep his job despite being caught circulating Internet images of beheadings and roadside bombings in Iraq.
This situation demonstrates that the police have been turned up side down by this evil politically correct government and it's blind efforts to recruit minorities the point where the force is an enemy the British people. They make up their own legal powers and exercise them as and when they choose. This evidence demonstrates that they persecute law abiding individuals but condone and support the Muslim terrorists who are trying murder the people of this country because they do not follow a book (the Koran) which instructs its followers to kill unbelievers.
I have great trouble in understanding why the people of this country haven't already taken matters into their own hands and declared a civil war to liberate us from this evil and to restore the democracy and sensibility that existed in this country not too many years ago.
Mark Kaye
unprovoked murder of a man outside his home. The murderer is still standing
around when the wife of the man opens the door and shouts some insults to
the murderer. The group of policemen arrest and charge the woman to appear
in court on public order offences. The murderer walks away free, threatening
to kill even more people.
Sounds absurd? Well consider this:
In July 2005 Muslim terrorists murdered over 50 people in London and seriously injured many others. Two weeks later, they tried again. Thousands of Muslim crackpots where subsequently seen on TV marching the streets of London in support the terrorist atrocities. Only two were arrested and tried. Meanwhile, Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP was arrested and tried twice for insulting Muslim extremists and for warning that they were plotting terrorist attacks. To make matters even more absurd the police introduced a policy of dismissing officers who are members of the BNP, a legally registered, peaceful and democratic political party. Yet in response to recent revelations by MI5 that up to eight police officers are suspected of having links with Al Qaeda the police have said that the suspected jihadists have not even been suspended because they claim that the police do not have the legal power to suspend or dismiss them! One suspected jihadist officer working in the South East has been allowed to keep his job despite being caught circulating Internet images of beheadings and roadside bombings in Iraq.
This situation demonstrates that the police have been turned up side down by this evil politically correct government and it's blind efforts to recruit minorities the point where the force is an enemy the British people. They make up their own legal powers and exercise them as and when they choose. This evidence demonstrates that they persecute law abiding individuals but condone and support the Muslim terrorists who are trying murder the people of this country because they do not follow a book (the Koran) which instructs its followers to kill unbelievers.
I have great trouble in understanding why the people of this country haven't already taken matters into their own hands and declared a civil war to liberate us from this evil and to restore the democracy and sensibility that existed in this country not too many years ago.
Mark Kaye
The Murder of Keith Brown
At just after 4pm on Friday 6th of July, despite valiant efforts by paramedics, 52 year old Keith Brown was pronounced dead on the front lawn of his garden in Normacot, Stoke-on-Trent. The police, the local newspaper (the Sentinel), together with local TV and radio reported that Keith had died as the result of, “a dispute between neighbours”. As has become the norm when white indigenous people are killed by non-white immigrants no further details were given about the attack and the public were simply left to imagine just what might have occurred.
Had the roles of victim/perpetrator been reversed of course the media and the police would have gone to extraordinary lengths to emphasise the depths of British wickedness and speculate as to what great heights the victim would have climbed had the community not been deprived by yet another act of “white racism”.
The British people have become so used to the double standards employed in the reporting of race crime it has become understood amongst many British people that an attack on one of their own together with a non descriptive account of the assailants can mean only one thing.
Maybe there is some perverse logic operating here, perhaps with all good intentions the police and the media are justifying their selective treatment of racially-motivated assault, rape and murder as for the better interests of the community as a whole. Nevertheless, even the most twisted of liberal minds must be able to understand the consequences of completely writing off the indigenous population and that only in the relative short-term can they get away with it.
BNP presence on council
Unfortunately for those content to sacrifice their own kind on the altar of diversity, the latest Muslim gang murder of an Englishman took place in Stoke-on-Trent. This very English city regularly votes en masse for British National Party representatives with the result that, despite massive efforts by the Labour Party, a powerful block of BNP councillors sits in the Civic Hall. The people of this city are fair-minded, proud and intelligent and easily able to repel the constant stream of ethno-masochistic propaganda that is regularly directed towards them. The people of Stoke elect BNP councilors for a reason, because they believe with all their hearts that the Party and its councillors are the only ones prepared to tell the truth.
In many British town and cities the murder of another one of our own kind at the hands of yet another gang of Muslim thugs could very well be covered up, but not in Stoke. What you are about to read is the shocking and scandalous truth about the murder of Keith Brown, a man now being mourned by seven children.
Land grab
The so-called neighbourhood dispute first started when Keith Brown’s Muslim neighbours decided to move the fence that divides their property an extra two feet in their favour. Keith tried all he could to get the council’s legal team to stop the erection of concrete posts and new fence panels on his property, but despite being advised that he was “in the right” on several occasions nothing was done.
Every morning Keith would open his curtains to see this encroachment on his own bit of land, his own personal space and, as the large Muslim family started to take pleasure in goading him about the invasion of his property, his quality of life became minimal.
The relationship between the neighbours became seriously strained and it was not long before the police were called to intervene. Amazingly though it was Keith who found himself dragged before the courts on a trumped up charge of “racism”, but thankfully his West Indian neighbour appeared as a witness and described the charges as ridiculous. Eventually the case was thrown out.
Keith’s eldest son was actually sent to prison for later defending his father against a further physical assault, the injustice of which hurt Keith considerably.
Last year the brake pipes of Keith’s van were cut and he narrowly avoided a serious accident. Not long after this Keith’s beloved English bull terrier was poisoned to death and his Alsatian puppy mysteriously disappeared.
Throughout all of this time Keith and his partner had requested to move from the area to a new council house, but despite being on the housing list for years nothing was ever done for them.
CCTV footage
In desperation Keith fitted a CCTV system to his house in order to obtain video evidence of the continued racially-motivated abuse and assaults directed towards him and his family. One such assault was indeed captured on video and burnt to DVD. Last year Stoke BNP councillor Steve Batkin requested a meeting with a local police Inspector at Sutherland Road Police Station in Longton to hand over the DVD and to complain about Muslim drug dealing in the area. The female, Asian officer refused to even take the DVD and dismissed Steve’s formal complaint about the continuing assaults on Keith Brown saying that , “she knew who he was”. In the minuted meeting she at least said she would look at the narcotics issue, but later informed Steve that the alleged drug-dealing was just down to “private hire drivers falling asleep in their cars”.
The months of anguish continued for Keith, abuse, assaults and smashed windows until finally the inevitable but entirely avoidable happed. Last Friday afternoon witnesses saw Keith and his neighbours in yet another flare up. Keith had just returned from picking up his three youngest children from school when he was confronted by a group of Muslim men outside his house. Whilst Keith was remonstrating with these men another Muslim man crept from behind a car and plunged a large knife in his back. Keith never saw it coming, but his three young children did. Having brutally attacked Keith the gang then set about his 19-year-old son leaving him hospitalised.
As Keith lay dying in his garden, paramedics desperately tried to resuscitate him, but Keith had already slipped away, stabbed in the back by his murderer and stabbed in the back by those who should have protected him.
One of the things we have always been proud of in this country is that, unlike other countries, life is not cheap here. Not anymore, even in Third world countries never would the ruling elite, the police and the media despise their fellow countrymen so much that they would conspire to ensure that their lives were made the cheapest of them all.
BNP News
Had the roles of victim/perpetrator been reversed of course the media and the police would have gone to extraordinary lengths to emphasise the depths of British wickedness and speculate as to what great heights the victim would have climbed had the community not been deprived by yet another act of “white racism”.
The British people have become so used to the double standards employed in the reporting of race crime it has become understood amongst many British people that an attack on one of their own together with a non descriptive account of the assailants can mean only one thing.
Maybe there is some perverse logic operating here, perhaps with all good intentions the police and the media are justifying their selective treatment of racially-motivated assault, rape and murder as for the better interests of the community as a whole. Nevertheless, even the most twisted of liberal minds must be able to understand the consequences of completely writing off the indigenous population and that only in the relative short-term can they get away with it.
BNP presence on council
Unfortunately for those content to sacrifice their own kind on the altar of diversity, the latest Muslim gang murder of an Englishman took place in Stoke-on-Trent. This very English city regularly votes en masse for British National Party representatives with the result that, despite massive efforts by the Labour Party, a powerful block of BNP councillors sits in the Civic Hall. The people of this city are fair-minded, proud and intelligent and easily able to repel the constant stream of ethno-masochistic propaganda that is regularly directed towards them. The people of Stoke elect BNP councilors for a reason, because they believe with all their hearts that the Party and its councillors are the only ones prepared to tell the truth.
In many British town and cities the murder of another one of our own kind at the hands of yet another gang of Muslim thugs could very well be covered up, but not in Stoke. What you are about to read is the shocking and scandalous truth about the murder of Keith Brown, a man now being mourned by seven children.
Land grab
The so-called neighbourhood dispute first started when Keith Brown’s Muslim neighbours decided to move the fence that divides their property an extra two feet in their favour. Keith tried all he could to get the council’s legal team to stop the erection of concrete posts and new fence panels on his property, but despite being advised that he was “in the right” on several occasions nothing was done.
Every morning Keith would open his curtains to see this encroachment on his own bit of land, his own personal space and, as the large Muslim family started to take pleasure in goading him about the invasion of his property, his quality of life became minimal.
The relationship between the neighbours became seriously strained and it was not long before the police were called to intervene. Amazingly though it was Keith who found himself dragged before the courts on a trumped up charge of “racism”, but thankfully his West Indian neighbour appeared as a witness and described the charges as ridiculous. Eventually the case was thrown out.
Keith’s eldest son was actually sent to prison for later defending his father against a further physical assault, the injustice of which hurt Keith considerably.
Last year the brake pipes of Keith’s van were cut and he narrowly avoided a serious accident. Not long after this Keith’s beloved English bull terrier was poisoned to death and his Alsatian puppy mysteriously disappeared.
Throughout all of this time Keith and his partner had requested to move from the area to a new council house, but despite being on the housing list for years nothing was ever done for them.
CCTV footage
In desperation Keith fitted a CCTV system to his house in order to obtain video evidence of the continued racially-motivated abuse and assaults directed towards him and his family. One such assault was indeed captured on video and burnt to DVD. Last year Stoke BNP councillor Steve Batkin requested a meeting with a local police Inspector at Sutherland Road Police Station in Longton to hand over the DVD and to complain about Muslim drug dealing in the area. The female, Asian officer refused to even take the DVD and dismissed Steve’s formal complaint about the continuing assaults on Keith Brown saying that , “she knew who he was”. In the minuted meeting she at least said she would look at the narcotics issue, but later informed Steve that the alleged drug-dealing was just down to “private hire drivers falling asleep in their cars”.
The months of anguish continued for Keith, abuse, assaults and smashed windows until finally the inevitable but entirely avoidable happed. Last Friday afternoon witnesses saw Keith and his neighbours in yet another flare up. Keith had just returned from picking up his three youngest children from school when he was confronted by a group of Muslim men outside his house. Whilst Keith was remonstrating with these men another Muslim man crept from behind a car and plunged a large knife in his back. Keith never saw it coming, but his three young children did. Having brutally attacked Keith the gang then set about his 19-year-old son leaving him hospitalised.
As Keith lay dying in his garden, paramedics desperately tried to resuscitate him, but Keith had already slipped away, stabbed in the back by his murderer and stabbed in the back by those who should have protected him.
One of the things we have always been proud of in this country is that, unlike other countries, life is not cheap here. Not anymore, even in Third world countries never would the ruling elite, the police and the media despise their fellow countrymen so much that they would conspire to ensure that their lives were made the cheapest of them all.
BNP News
MILITARY AND POLITICAL STRATEGY
By Paul Harris
Almost everyone in Britain is unhappy with the number of immigrants in this country. You hear people talking about it all the time. The slightest mention of it and it suddenly becomes the main topic of conversation. Many people have become so disillusioned with the direction that this country is heading that they have decided to get out – to become immigrants themselves - to a country they see as having a more secure future. It’s a last resort for them but the future of their own children is paramount.
So why do the three Establishment parties, Labour, the Conservatives, and the Lib Dems, totally ignore this major concern that people have, and pretend instead that people are in favour of immigration, asylum seeking, and a multiracial Britain. I believe it’s because of a very basic trait of human beings. Once a certain set of ideas and concepts become established people will stick to these even when the rules change and the concepts become outdated.
We can find a parallel in what happened in the First World War. For hundreds of years before this war weapons were very primitive. Basically smooth bore muzzle loading flintlocks which were inaccurate and had a slow rate of fire. When an army was required to take the position of the opposing army the most effective tactic was to strike terror into the enemy by walking en-masse towards their position with bayonets fixed. The enemy could see you coming relentlessly forward but with their slow and inaccurate rate of fire there was precious little they could do to stop you. As the attacking army you had little to fear from your enemy as they desperately reloaded and fired their primitive weapons. You knew that long before you reached their position their nerve would break, their ranks would break, and they would be in headlong terrified flight. So you kept going, even as some of your comrades fell around you. In nearly all conflicts the attacking army would take the enemy position in this way.
But suddenly the rules of warfare changed. The machine gun was invented. Now a defending army with just a couple of well placed machine guns could mow down an entire advancing army with ease long before it reached their own position. But the fixed thinking of the military commanders of the time still dictated that the way to take an enemy position was to walk towards their position with bayonets fixed. The tactics that had worked for centuries would surely hold true now. So the British army walked towards the German trenches with bayonets fixed. Result. They were mown down in their hundreds of thousands, killed with ease because of an hopelessly outdated military tactic. And believe it or not the commanders refused to believe that the tactics they had been taught in military school were not working. So they sent another wave of troops to their deaths. And another. And another. It took several years of senseless slaughter before they realised that these tactics were just not working anymore.
So how can what happened 90 odd years ago be compared with what is happening today in Britain. What recent technological development has totally changed the rules so that all the old concepts and strategies that worked fine before have suddenly been rendered useless? And who is it that refuses to acknowledge this change?
The answer to this should be immediately apparent to everyone. Not so long ago uncomfortable facts could be concealed from the public by censorship. Dissident writers and publications could be suppressed using laws designed for the purpose, and the Establishment could force their own ideas and beliefs onto the masses through the controlled media – newspapers, television, and radio. Any dissident party that arose could be isolated and suppressed by propaganda and disinformation in the media. Without doubt the British Establishment have been very successful at doing this for the last 40 years.
Not any longer. Now we have the internet, which is becoming more dominant with every day that goes by. The Establishment can’t suppress the internet, and they can’t stop people finding out what is really going on. They no longer have a monopoly on information and ideas and can’t tell people what they should be thinking. They can’t stop people reading about an alternative set of ideas to their own and they can’t stop people deciding for themselves what is right and what is wrong. Members of a dissident party no longer feel isolated and can readily make contact with their party through it’s website. In fact for a totalitarian Government the internet is its worse nightmare.
They are continually crowing about how they beat the National Front in the seventies, and how they’re going to defeat the British National Party in the same way. But the BNP has the internet. Because of the internet they can never beat us.
So why do the three Establishment parties, Labour, the Conservatives, and the Lib Dems, totally ignore this major concern that people have, and pretend instead that people are in favour of immigration, asylum seeking, and a multiracial Britain. I believe it’s because of a very basic trait of human beings. Once a certain set of ideas and concepts become established people will stick to these even when the rules change and the concepts become outdated.
We can find a parallel in what happened in the First World War. For hundreds of years before this war weapons were very primitive. Basically smooth bore muzzle loading flintlocks which were inaccurate and had a slow rate of fire. When an army was required to take the position of the opposing army the most effective tactic was to strike terror into the enemy by walking en-masse towards their position with bayonets fixed. The enemy could see you coming relentlessly forward but with their slow and inaccurate rate of fire there was precious little they could do to stop you. As the attacking army you had little to fear from your enemy as they desperately reloaded and fired their primitive weapons. You knew that long before you reached their position their nerve would break, their ranks would break, and they would be in headlong terrified flight. So you kept going, even as some of your comrades fell around you. In nearly all conflicts the attacking army would take the enemy position in this way.
But suddenly the rules of warfare changed. The machine gun was invented. Now a defending army with just a couple of well placed machine guns could mow down an entire advancing army with ease long before it reached their own position. But the fixed thinking of the military commanders of the time still dictated that the way to take an enemy position was to walk towards their position with bayonets fixed. The tactics that had worked for centuries would surely hold true now. So the British army walked towards the German trenches with bayonets fixed. Result. They were mown down in their hundreds of thousands, killed with ease because of an hopelessly outdated military tactic. And believe it or not the commanders refused to believe that the tactics they had been taught in military school were not working. So they sent another wave of troops to their deaths. And another. And another. It took several years of senseless slaughter before they realised that these tactics were just not working anymore.
So how can what happened 90 odd years ago be compared with what is happening today in Britain. What recent technological development has totally changed the rules so that all the old concepts and strategies that worked fine before have suddenly been rendered useless? And who is it that refuses to acknowledge this change?
The answer to this should be immediately apparent to everyone. Not so long ago uncomfortable facts could be concealed from the public by censorship. Dissident writers and publications could be suppressed using laws designed for the purpose, and the Establishment could force their own ideas and beliefs onto the masses through the controlled media – newspapers, television, and radio. Any dissident party that arose could be isolated and suppressed by propaganda and disinformation in the media. Without doubt the British Establishment have been very successful at doing this for the last 40 years.
Not any longer. Now we have the internet, which is becoming more dominant with every day that goes by. The Establishment can’t suppress the internet, and they can’t stop people finding out what is really going on. They no longer have a monopoly on information and ideas and can’t tell people what they should be thinking. They can’t stop people reading about an alternative set of ideas to their own and they can’t stop people deciding for themselves what is right and what is wrong. Members of a dissident party no longer feel isolated and can readily make contact with their party through it’s website. In fact for a totalitarian Government the internet is its worse nightmare.
They are continually crowing about how they beat the National Front in the seventies, and how they’re going to defeat the British National Party in the same way. But the BNP has the internet. Because of the internet they can never beat us.
UNBELIEVABLE
Place: Srebrenica-Potocari Memorial and Cemetery, BosniaEvent:
Clinton opens a monument dedicated to Al Qaeda fighters and bows to it!
What is this monument inscribed in Arabic script doing in Bosnia? What is it doing in the Western media declared "Heart of Europe?" None of the peoples of ex-Yugoslavia speak or understand Arabic. None. None of the Bosnian Muslims with exception of maybe a tiny minority of Islam clergy understands Arabic. So, for whom was this monument erected? The only answer to the puzzle could be the fact that round 10,000 foreign volunteers, jihad fighters, fought against the Christian population of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Most of these Islamic fanatics, members of Al Qaeda, came from Arab speaking countries.
And that is the answer to the puzzle.
America has right to know. As you will see from the text that follows - American government invested ONE MILLION dollars into this monument.
And that is the answer to the puzzle.
America has right to know. As you will see from the text that follows - American government invested ONE MILLION dollars into this monument.
VJ
Veronica is a tad angry today!
How can these goons talk for so long without mentioning a number one concern...immigration!
number two law..there is none.
i'd love to see them tackle the Eu /Arab dialogue which by 2010 will allow 8 more muslim countries to have a free trade agreement which means free entrance to the Eu.
Will one MP explain this from any party at Westminster?
Would they explain The Barcelona declaration signed in 1995 by Rifking which will lead to a virtual hand over of europe to muslims?
Explain to the population the eumed union, what it means what it is?
The politicians are scared to death this will come to light before it's too late by 2009 when they have lied us into full co-operation with the EU DESTROYED THIS COUNTRY, and when we can do nothing about it.
Explain why we pay astronomical amounts from the eu budget now to Arab countries while they buy bombs?
They speak of nazis while not explaining why they employ a nazi in our foreign office a guy from the muslim brotherhood,,,hamas,...the founder al. banna an egypian nazi that unlike any BNP member fought the British tommy's on Hitlers side in ww2.
Why they employ a member of Hizb-ut- tahrir in our home office a guy working to establish the islamic caliphate a rabid anti semite group?
This marxist government certainly is one full of hypocrites and liars.
Were marxist any better than the nazis they claim to hate so much?
Of course not, this bunch really think the UK people are stupid they bring into force PC a nice name to cover up what it really is cultural marxism.
They allow our children to be slowly indoctrinated into islam at our schools hoping we won't notice at the tea table when young johnny doesn't pray to Jesus but mentions the moon god allah.
They bring in thousands of immigrants to dilute the British people and culture and again hope we're too stupid to realize.
Genocide by stealth again hoping we don't notice then they pretend we should fear the BNP.
We saw what happened in Yugoslavia to appease muslims handing over Kosovo to repay their aggression towards the Serbs not the lies we were fed, like the Canadian MP....Yugoslavia and concentration camps were like Iraqi WMDS.
Germany hated the Serbs and their patience paid off killed two birds with one stone.
What happens when muslims decide they'd like an area here say..Bradford or London. do we say ok?
Would nato bomb us should we do what the Serbs did protect their homeland?
That would be another question why the cover up about what still happens in Kosovo churches destroyed burnt to the ground after muslim nutters wreck the place while NATO stands by?
oh yes labour...we have so much ammo and i can't wait to use it. blow your lies wide open so in the end you can go to Iraq with a spade and find your WMDS.
But since in 2000 the bbc should still have the tape of the night service where the invasion of Iraq was discussed at first the plan was a 150.000 troop drop in the oil fields area, you lot know they don't exist and our troops are dying for your lies.
This marxist gang would love us to believe they hold the moral high ground when in reality they are not fit to even lick the shoes of any BNP member.
They play at Democracy for now while putting in place the tools of dire oppression it's no mistake that Mandleson [MARXIST] Merkal [ MARXIST] EU TOOLS infact most of our cabinet inc Brown were either full blown marxists or wrote in support as Brown did at university.
These points are what i'd love answers to not the crap they the MARXISTS would like me to think i need answers on.
Your brainwashing tactics did not catch everyone NL I was a Tory but my party went too soft too culturally marxist, bowing on the alter of multiculture when one country can only have one culture.
I recall that pratt PRESCOT when he said There was no such place or race as English...Well lets see what next years voters think when the letter your office sent is blown up for all to see........
We're not all scared to say i'm a BNP member when we back down from tyrants then we're finished.
Not very confident were they for politicians mumbles mistakes ... but that is a continuation of the last ten years of this marxist regime......
Love how they have to get the bully boys out to fight their battles UAF...UNIONS...ALL KNOWN FOR THE DEMOCRACY THEY PRACTISE....
ISLAMIC SUPPORTING SCUM THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE AT WESTMINSTER TODAY,
WE WANT A REFERENDUM AND THE EU/ARAB DIALOGUE EXPLAINED BEFORE THE TRIALS FOR TREACHORY START.
Thank's for allowing me to rant....my rage is getting stronger by the day.
Take Care!
Veronica.
number two law..there is none.
i'd love to see them tackle the Eu /Arab dialogue which by 2010 will allow 8 more muslim countries to have a free trade agreement which means free entrance to the Eu.
Will one MP explain this from any party at Westminster?
Would they explain The Barcelona declaration signed in 1995 by Rifking which will lead to a virtual hand over of europe to muslims?
Explain to the population the eumed union, what it means what it is?
The politicians are scared to death this will come to light before it's too late by 2009 when they have lied us into full co-operation with the EU DESTROYED THIS COUNTRY, and when we can do nothing about it.
Explain why we pay astronomical amounts from the eu budget now to Arab countries while they buy bombs?
They speak of nazis while not explaining why they employ a nazi in our foreign office a guy from the muslim brotherhood,,,hamas,...the founder al. banna an egypian nazi that unlike any BNP member fought the British tommy's on Hitlers side in ww2.
Why they employ a member of Hizb-ut- tahrir in our home office a guy working to establish the islamic caliphate a rabid anti semite group?
This marxist government certainly is one full of hypocrites and liars.
Were marxist any better than the nazis they claim to hate so much?
Of course not, this bunch really think the UK people are stupid they bring into force PC a nice name to cover up what it really is cultural marxism.
They allow our children to be slowly indoctrinated into islam at our schools hoping we won't notice at the tea table when young johnny doesn't pray to Jesus but mentions the moon god allah.
They bring in thousands of immigrants to dilute the British people and culture and again hope we're too stupid to realize.
Genocide by stealth again hoping we don't notice then they pretend we should fear the BNP.
We saw what happened in Yugoslavia to appease muslims handing over Kosovo to repay their aggression towards the Serbs not the lies we were fed, like the Canadian MP....Yugoslavia and concentration camps were like Iraqi WMDS.
Germany hated the Serbs and their patience paid off killed two birds with one stone.
What happens when muslims decide they'd like an area here say..Bradford or London. do we say ok?
Would nato bomb us should we do what the Serbs did protect their homeland?
That would be another question why the cover up about what still happens in Kosovo churches destroyed burnt to the ground after muslim nutters wreck the place while NATO stands by?
oh yes labour...we have so much ammo and i can't wait to use it. blow your lies wide open so in the end you can go to Iraq with a spade and find your WMDS.
But since in 2000 the bbc should still have the tape of the night service where the invasion of Iraq was discussed at first the plan was a 150.000 troop drop in the oil fields area, you lot know they don't exist and our troops are dying for your lies.
This marxist gang would love us to believe they hold the moral high ground when in reality they are not fit to even lick the shoes of any BNP member.
They play at Democracy for now while putting in place the tools of dire oppression it's no mistake that Mandleson [MARXIST] Merkal [ MARXIST] EU TOOLS infact most of our cabinet inc Brown were either full blown marxists or wrote in support as Brown did at university.
These points are what i'd love answers to not the crap they the MARXISTS would like me to think i need answers on.
Your brainwashing tactics did not catch everyone NL I was a Tory but my party went too soft too culturally marxist, bowing on the alter of multiculture when one country can only have one culture.
I recall that pratt PRESCOT when he said There was no such place or race as English...Well lets see what next years voters think when the letter your office sent is blown up for all to see........
We're not all scared to say i'm a BNP member when we back down from tyrants then we're finished.
Not very confident were they for politicians mumbles mistakes ... but that is a continuation of the last ten years of this marxist regime......
Love how they have to get the bully boys out to fight their battles UAF...UNIONS...ALL KNOWN FOR THE DEMOCRACY THEY PRACTISE....
ISLAMIC SUPPORTING SCUM THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE AT WESTMINSTER TODAY,
WE WANT A REFERENDUM AND THE EU/ARAB DIALOGUE EXPLAINED BEFORE THE TRIALS FOR TREACHORY START.
Thank's for allowing me to rant....my rage is getting stronger by the day.
Take Care!
Veronica.
2 Great books from Jack Black
Two great books by Jack Black the guy behind the website ‘I am an Englishman’. Those of you who have not visited the site already should take the time to do so.
BLACKLIST is available for a mere £8.00 and can be bought using paypal. The book consists of 507 pages of black on white crimes and lots of really frightening statistics. this book should have a place in any Nationalists library. You can take a look at a preview of the book HERE, you will need Adobe reader to view.
STUNNING STATISTICS is another must buy; this is a pocket size book consisting of 76 pages.
The book is split into categories each having numerous statistics under each heading. The categories including a taster from each are
POLITICS & BIG BROTHER – In 2004, the UK exported 1,500 tonnes of potatoes to Germany and imported 1,500 tonnes from Germany. This is how big brother imposes interdependency and fingernails his middleman profit.
IMMIGRATION – about 24 million Muslims now live in Europe. In 1950 only 800,000 lived in our continent.
HEALTH – There has been a three fold rise in black Caribbean’s receiving treatment for HIV among the 20,000 Londoners who know they have it.
CHILDHOOD & EDUCATION – 55% of British Pakistanis are married to their first cousins.
CRIME – Out of 19,528 victims of robbery and other street crimes in London in 1983, 10,960 identified their assailants as black, 534 as mixed race and 5,262 of the offences were blamed on whites.
Considering there were a great many more white people living in London than black, at this time, this is a truly startling figure.
HISTORY – In South Africa almost 20,000 people were murdered between April 2003 and March 2004.
This little book is a must for any activist out canvassing who needs to quote a few home truths either to the left or the naïve. You can purchase this little gem for £2.00 including postage from Jacks site; just click the link below to purchase either or both books.
BUY BOTH ITEMS HERE
BLACKLIST is available for a mere £8.00 and can be bought using paypal. The book consists of 507 pages of black on white crimes and lots of really frightening statistics. this book should have a place in any Nationalists library. You can take a look at a preview of the book HERE, you will need Adobe reader to view.
STUNNING STATISTICS is another must buy; this is a pocket size book consisting of 76 pages.
The book is split into categories each having numerous statistics under each heading. The categories including a taster from each are
POLITICS & BIG BROTHER – In 2004, the UK exported 1,500 tonnes of potatoes to Germany and imported 1,500 tonnes from Germany. This is how big brother imposes interdependency and fingernails his middleman profit.
IMMIGRATION – about 24 million Muslims now live in Europe. In 1950 only 800,000 lived in our continent.
HEALTH – There has been a three fold rise in black Caribbean’s receiving treatment for HIV among the 20,000 Londoners who know they have it.
CHILDHOOD & EDUCATION – 55% of British Pakistanis are married to their first cousins.
CRIME – Out of 19,528 victims of robbery and other street crimes in London in 1983, 10,960 identified their assailants as black, 534 as mixed race and 5,262 of the offences were blamed on whites.
Considering there were a great many more white people living in London than black, at this time, this is a truly startling figure.
HISTORY – In South Africa almost 20,000 people were murdered between April 2003 and March 2004.
This little book is a must for any activist out canvassing who needs to quote a few home truths either to the left or the naïve. You can purchase this little gem for £2.00 including postage from Jacks site; just click the link below to purchase either or both books.
BUY BOTH ITEMS HERE
TREACHERY? TREASON? TRAITORS? Anne Palmer
Ordinary people do not usually betray a whole nation, rather the reverse, for they are the ones that voluntarily enlist or by conscription put their lives either on hold “for the duration”, or put themselves at risk or even pay the ultimate price for their fellow man. They do not cheat, deceive or lie to a whole nation.
Even before 1972 the people were betrayed by people at the very height of their career, by privileged people that were highly paid, some “honoured” by a special title, while the ordinary man was struggling to make ends meet and make a decent life for themselves and their family.
These ordinary people generally obeyed the law-worked hard-down pits, in factories on the land-yet saw their laws they were diligently obeying become trashed-cheapened-tarnished-rubbished and ignored and while standards slipped, even free speech the people had taken for granted became redundant, usurped by “politically correctness”.
Over recent years we have seen our Monarchy devalued-sidelined in every way. The Royal Yacht removed, the Royal ‘plane no longer available while the Prime Minister of the day treats himself like a President of the United Kingdom of Great Britain.
Recently, onslaughts have been made by certain members of the Government to bring forward Private Member’s “Succession to the Crown and Royal Marriages” Bill that would result in the unravelling of our Common Law Constitution. Deliberate attempts to destroy our Monarchy and Common Law Constitution.
Some in Parliament have said that there will be no change to our constitution by the ratifying of the EU Constitution. It is a “tidying up exercise”, “even a Golf Club has a Constitution” etc. These are very important prominent people, their word is their bond and therefore they are to be believed implicitly. The first eminent person to tell us “there would be no loss of essential Sovereignty” was Edward Heath, now Sir Edward! Yet here we have the proposed EU Constitution which states quite clearly that it has supremacy over our constitution and laws.
We have come to learn from the people of Iraq the high regard they have in forming their own Constitution. They have put their lives at risk by walking down their streets to place their “democratic” crosses on their voting forms. They value the “democracy” that our own Government are removing from US.
Citizenship of the European Union.
Each ratified new EU Treaty has resulted in the transferring of more national sovereignty to the European Union, for with the Maastricht Treaty one of the biggest changes was, from a “Community”(of nation states working together-a free association of sovereign states) to, as the title suggests a “Union”, a political entity, a new creation. It became a highly centralised creation. We also became “citizens” of this Union and there is an argument for realising that because the United Kingdom is a subordinate constituent of the European Union, must we consider that our citizenship is subordinate to EU citizenship? And if not now, will this happen when the EU has gathered for itself more authority through the EU constitution? Where will allegiance lie? Is it with the laws of the European Union or with the United Kingdom? Can one create a citizenship without a STATE? To add insult to injury, acceptance of EU Citizenship was not a voluntary matter, we had to accept it, and it was thrust upon us.
We should ask ourselves, what is the point in creating European Citizenship? The answer has to be for the creating of one State, and an obligation by the citizen to that state. The Commission proposed that the European Citizen would have the right of free residence and movement and a right to vote in local and European parliamentary elections, (municipal) and it said that targets for the definition of the individuals civic, economic and social rights would be set at a later stage. There is also a question of what the word “municipal” means, does it mean, ‘local’ or ‘national’ and in the end it will surely be the European Court of Justice that decides. Food for thought?
The Encyclopaedia Britannica defines “citizenship” as the “relationship between an individual and state, defined by the law of that state, with corresponding duties and rights”, so the new state can decide and change those duties anytime it wants to. We have been given “new” rights in the charter of fundamental rights. One thing we have not been given “is the RIGHT to say “NO”. We were never given the chance by the EU or our Government, for they did not ask whether we wanted EU citizenship.
We are told not to worry, it is only “additional to”, an “add on”, a bonus” not “in place of”, so WHAT is the point of it? Accept the EU constitution and then ask where will our oaths of allegiance lie? Will it be in conflict with our oath to the Queen? Perhaps we should change our loyal oath and then it will not be in conflict? That change to our oath is happening now (SOCA and police) yet these changes are contrary to our Constitution. According to R v Thistlewood 1820, to destroy the Constitution is “an act of treason”. If that action is an act of treason-repeal the Treason Acts then? This has happened already. I would like you to think about this puzzle. What if the European Court of Justice decided that the Oath of Allegiance to our Queen was superseded by a superior allegiance owed to a different political organisation such as the European Union? The Constitution we have recently accepted knowing and agreeing that it is superior even to our highest Court, and cabinet, proving eventually that the European Union citizenship we thought was additional to, is now superior to our British citizenship? What then? Can any Government of this Country afford to take a chance? Is it not being the tiniest bit reckless with our country?
Simply using the European Communities Act to remove this Country from the Union after ratification of the EU constitution may well bring down scorn from the Union. What about the Exit clause that this Country’s Government have ‘freely and willingly’ agreed to? Try and get the other 24 states (that might no longer exist) to agree?
We are only just beginning to realise just how precious “citizenship”, is to us. It is an attribute most dear to an individual, and primarily acquired by virtue of birth. If it is not acquired by birth, citizenship is acquired by conscious and carefully considered application-in this country by a process of naturalisation.
There is no doubt that this EU citizenship comes within the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Therefore, the duties imposed by the Treaty (of Maastricht and any further treaties) will be adjudicated upon by the European Court of Justice. When we consider that the European Court of Justice describes itself in political terms as the agent for greater federalism, we should sit up and take note of that fact. It is also important to note that the preamble is justiciable and something the European Court of Justice is obliged to take into account.
With citizenship goes the right to deny oneself citizenship, in other words, to give it up. We cannot repeal the EU citizenship that has been “bestowed” upon us. It has been suggested that the only way in which a “European national” could renounce his European citizenship is to renounce the nationality of his birth or the nationality he acquired by naturalisation. This makes a nonsense because in international law, no one is allowed to be “stateless”. Why did I, along with many others renounce our European Citizenship? This came about after the Home Secretary gave himself the powers to remove the citizenship of a person born here in the UK. The thought was by renouncing the one citizenship-EU-we could not then have our British citizenship removed, leaving us simply with EU citizenship.
What is the purpose of citizenship of the EU? We can read that “Citizens shall be subject to the duties imposed” but nowhere are those duties made clear. Only a fool signs a contract without knowing what their “duties” are. What if it is a ‘duty’ to pay taxes? To eventually have our youth “conscripted” into a Euro Army? This was brought home to us very recently over our involvement in Iraq, when other countries, quite correctly used their own authority to keep out of it. In an EU State, we would have to do as we are told. If a European State decides that its forces are to go into Iraq, we would have to conform because our EU citizenship will eventually place a duty and an obligation on us to abide by their orders.
Union Citizenship cannot be acquired alone, nor can it be forfeited without giving up nationality. EU Citizenship becomes a nightmare. It becomes like Ivy that clings to another living plant until eventually it strangles the life out of that that gave it life in the first place.
I have placed a great deal of emphasis on EU Citizenship, because there is a great deal in the proposed EU documentation, from schools to old age on “deeper and more meaningful EU citizenship. And a proposed increase for “town” and or “schools” for “twinning” (Wasn’t there an Oath made in that too?).
How does Citizenship affect the Queen?
Her Majesty has British citizenship for she was born here in the United Kingdom of Great Britain-she wasn’t always Queen (and was not expected to be Queen) and she served in the armed services during the last war. She is therefore as British as they come. More-over, and I quote Sir Ivan Lawrence here (Hansard 1st Feb 1993 Col 68) “It is generally accepted by international lawyers, as well as by the Home Secretary and the Government, that Her Majesty the Queen is pre-eminently the British citizen and is therefore subject to the law of the land as any citizen would be. The last member of the royal family who said that he was not a British citizen and that he was not subject to the laws and obligations of the land had a little walk further down Whitehall, which ended in the loss of an important part of his body and a number of years of civil war”.
It was also pointed out by Mr Spearing in response, “”Unlike the legislation of the Community, which would bind the duty of the monarch of legislation of this House, consequent on a legislative programme of the Community, under the intergovernmental parts of the treaty (Maastricht) that require a single process, it would become the duty of the Crown and its prerogative-meaning government, which traditionally has not been completely within the grasp of this House-to concur with whatever the intergovernmental institution decreed? For the first time, the prerogative of the Crown, as well as the Crown itself, would become subject to the macro-treaties of which we speak”.
Later on a Mr Wardle makes clears, “ The Maastricht Treaty does not in any way affect the constitutional position of the Monarch. Her Majesty as an individual would of course enjoy the same rights within the EC as any other United Kingdom citizen”. That statement (to me at least) makes clear that if the Queen enjoys the same rights she will incur the duties of European citizenship and like the rest of us will be so bound. Our Queen, Head of State, the supreme citizen of our political entity, would owe allegiance to some higher, wider authority-a superstate. Did Sir Edward Heath also point out once that the position of the Crown would not be affected by our entry into this Common market?
Just like we are all enjoying those same rights eh? Some remember John Major triumphantly saying that even the Queen was now a citizen of the European Community. We can see that without any doubt whatsoever, like us all, Her Majesty was not consulted, yet it was a decision and a commitment they made that day while debating the Maastricht Treaty it involved not just US, but our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. We also know now, without any doubt, that the Union is not going to be an open, decentralise, democratic Union, it is not even to become a federally run United States of Europe, but a unitary, centralised political social European Superstate. A Superstate that wants its own Constitution.
The Queen having been made a citizen of the Community would and especially if the EU Constitution is ratified, make her subordinate to the President of the Commission whoever it might be at that time. She might be called Queen, but as a citizen of that state, he/she will be President of the whole of the European Union. That also poses the question, who will take precedence at official functions?My goodness yes, EU Citizenship will eventually bring forth many changes, as it was always meant to, for there was absolutely no point in EU Citizenship if it meant nothing at all. Just to enhance? A concept?
From my reading of Hansard, and the way our MP’s debated the subject, it becomes obvious, without any doubt what-so-ever that the Queen was never asked, was never consulted, and was treated in exactly the same way as the people of this Country. As an aside, I will also add that the reading of Hansard books from the 1950’s-1975’s to after the Treaty of Rome was signed, the same thing happened then.
Loss of Sovereignty.
It has been said (at times) that we lost “sovereignty” through being in NATO. There is no comparison between NATO, a free association of independent states and the European Union in terms of conferring obligation on citizens. NATO is such a free association of independent states that the French, since De Gaulle’s time, have decided, in their own sovereign manner, to remain independent of NATO’s integrated military structure. Certainly NATO have never made people “citizens” of their organisation. A different kind of treaty altogether from EU Treaties.
What if the people vote “NO” to the EU constitution?
It has been said that if we vote “NO” to the EU Constitution, the other States could go on without us. That they could repeal the Treaties for the making of one Constitution. If that happened there would be no Treaties left for us to BE in. Yet if we look to the Vienna Convention on the law of Treaties, it allows for some of the parties to a treaty to decide to modify the treaty/treaties among themselves, as long as any alteration does not affect the rights of the others that prefer to go on/stay behind. (Difficult though!) A Treaty such as The Treaty on Union 1707 between Scotland and England would be fine if all the people and governments of each Country were to agree, BUT even that Treaty between two Countries (not 25) there are complications, for there are no longer two separate Parliaments/Governments. One devolved now-with limited authority and one United Kingdom Parliament-no English Parliament. Under the current rules of Article 48 of the European Union, all member states must give their agreement to the changes. If more than one state says “NO”, they are legally entitled to stick to that view and prevent the others from going ahead.
If a country says “NO” to the EU Constitution: I suggest the exact opposite may well be the case: the old treaties remain in force and there is no new structure which the “Yes” countries could adhere to, or existing structure for them to hold on to. No further pressure of retaking a referendum to make them fall into line, or “to get it right”. The people will have spoken. The great danger is that much of the proposed legislation in the EU Constitution may have already gone ahead via Regulation or Directive or the Hague Programme (will that be deemed illegal)? What will we be left to vote on, in a Constitution? Could Articles that have not gone through, be put forward again via Regulation? Will Governments, having seen the way the people have voted, decide to say no to EU Regulations? Want to press ahead regardless? What will be the reaction of the people?
Having been promised a Referendum on the EU Constitution, this Country must have a referendum whether other countries have already voted it down or not. This is essential if only to find out the depth of feeling in this Country towards the European Union. It is vitally important that a referendum takes place. Will our Members of Parliament go knocking on doors during the general election or the referendum, saying vote for me because I want to give all the sovereignty (authority) we have left to the European Union? I want to make sure that all decisions that will affect this Country-forever- go where we want it to go-to the great European Union? Is that what they will say? All in the name of peace and goodwill? Is it truly theirs to give? Will our Parliamentarians still expect to be elected to Parliament and get paid handsomely for a job they no longer do? Just like nodding donkey’s rubber stamping EU legislation through for the people of this Country to obey, as usual?
What about “Our” Courts?
Many ordinary people concerned at the way our own ministers are willingly and eagerly giving away sovereignty of this Country to the European Union, have taken the momentous decision to look to the Courts of this Island under “Misprision of Treason”, to ‘stay’ the hands that would treasonously undermine our Common Law Constitution and thus destroy it. None so far has succeeded. Why? All our MP’s swear Allegiance to the Queen. All our Judges swear Allegiance to the Queen, and they sit in front of the Royal Coat of Arms, and in fact, they are there to represent the Queen. So where does it all go wrong? When ordinary people try to do their duty, when they can see their own parliamentarians ceding sovereignty of this Country to the Union and the governing of this Country be determined by the Union, what or who is preventing them, or the Courts, from doing their duty?
The Union already refers to Courts, as “European Union” courts. The judges apply European Union Laws. They have to observe the Human Rights Act and if they do not apply Union law the European Court of Justice will in turn overrule them. There has been question of where Kompetenze Kompetenze lies? It is a question that no one seems able (or willing) to answer. The European Union’s Court of Justice on the other hand, is not answerable to any nation state- it may be that it is answerable to no one. It sees itself as a tool for the creation and improvement of the European Union. It works solely for the ideals of the European Union and to further the Union’s progress on the world stage.
While we are busy destroying the independence and highly regarded Law Lords presently housed in the House of Lords, whose reputation has been formed over hundreds of years and has been the envy of many Countries all over the world, now do charge them eventually, to do their duties in a newly formed Supreme Court and by so doing allowing the interference from the political menagerie and thus align themselves with other Supreme Courts in the European Union.
Any dispute that arises, any system of Justice, or any terms of dispute regarding citizenship, the interpretation of direct EU laws or treaty and especially any dispute over the EU Constitution, any dispute ever the application of “British” justice, should the term British survive, will be decided by a European Court determined to develop further, the European Union. It will automatically supersede and crush the independence of what once was a nation state.
When people attended Court here in the UK, the Judges had a choice didn’t they? They could apply the law according to the oath they so swore, or they could apply the law of the European Union. I find it difficult to accept that a Judge can swear allegiance to the Queen whilst applying EU law, but then we have to remember that EU law comes to us because our governments have incorporated it (accepted it) into our Law-it is indeed our law. Isn’t it?
The people will have a choice, providing they are given a referendum that is fair and free from corruption. But even in an election in the past has anyone said, “vote for me and I will go about giving our country away to the Union to govern”. Not exactly a vote winner, is it? It is known that there was fraud during the all-postal voting experiment on the Regions, but the Government decided continue with all posting voting and not to “err on the side of caution”. Is that a green light for all parties to act fraudulently for surely, what is fair for the goose is fair for the gander?
Is the Treaty ESTABLISHING A Constitution for Europe, a “Treaty” or a “Constitution”?
What is a Constitution? I quote from the papers by Jean-Claude Piris, who was the Legal Advisor of the Council of the European Union and was the Legal Advisor of the intergovernmental conferences, which negotiated and adopted the Treaty of Maastricht and the Treaty of Amsterdam. He looked at Black’s Law Dictionary for the main elements of a Constitution.
• A constitution organises the government of the entity to which it applies; a Constitution prescribes the extent and manner of the exercise of sovereign powers.
• A Constitution is the absolute rule of action: any official act in breach of it is illegal (this presupposes a constitutional or supreme court)
• A Constitution frequently lists rights of the individual and guarantees their protection.
• A Constitution derives its authority from the governed and is agreed upon by the people;
• A constitution is the fundamental law of a nation of state. End of quotes.
Reading down those points, now begs the question, was our entry into the Common Market in 1972 illegal in the first place? From the reading of Hansard debates on the subject under the heading of “European Communities”, I believe it was illegal. These past few years, the ignoring of our Common Law Constitution by the Government, particularly where the British nationality is specifically mentioned for Magistrates and Police, has been ignored, yet Magna Carta, The Bill of Rights, The Act of Settlement and the Queens Coronation Oath remain the same for they cannot be altered, they are a contract between the people and the Monarch. I ask, are not these new Acts of Parliament illegal? Are they ultra vires? Can they be challenged? And can those that have fallen foul through the application of them, also challenge and overturn?
The EU Constitution is incorporated into our system by the “Treaty”, but once installed, the Constitution then takes over, in exactly the same way that using the European Communities Act to install the original Treaty of Rome, for once installed, the European Community’ laws overruled our Laws.
Some people have said that the Treaties that have gone before are “constitutional”, however, each treaty has been labelled quite clearly, a “Treaty”, the Treaty of Rome, the Treaty of Amsterdam etc. All previous European Community Treaties were developed through the usual diplomatic channels; finalised the same way and ratified by parliament (some through referendum) it has been suggested, (by the EU Parliament) for the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, that the people should have a referendum. Even the title, makes clear that to “establish” something, is to set up something “new” “something different”. The Treaty “ESTABLISHES” a Constitution for the European Union as a whole.
By using a “Convention” that took eighteen months to come to fruition, makes the Constitution very different from all the other EU treaties. All the articles in it that gives itself authority, legal personality, etc, makes it different, it also makes very clear that “the EU Constitution, and law adopted by the Union’s institutions in exercising competences conferred upon it, shall have primacy over the law of the Member states”. There is no getting away from that. It has to be remembered also, that it IS one constitution for all its member states.The European Union is lacking some essential elements for it to become the State it so obviously wants to become. And the United Kingdom still has not given away control of its economy, its sterling currency or reserves. But the EU Constitution will go a long way in allowing the Union to gather these elements together.It is as a signal for the beginning of the end of the Nation States.The dilemma of the High Court Judges and the Law Lords, the highest Judges in the land, now comes under scrutiny. As time went on our Judges must have known that their decisions would in the end destroy this County’s ability to govern itself, their decision in putting the European Union’s laws above their own country, as laid down in EU law, would remove the ability of this country’s Government from ever governing again, yet that is what they were doing, and that is what they were meant and had to do. As I see it, they had no option, they were putting into action what the politicians had bade them to do. That bidding was the acceptance of the European Union treaties, but who advised the politicians that signing these treaties would not remove sovereignty from this country? We now know the advice given to the then Edward Heath by Lord Kilmuir and I note that this advice was given to Edward Heath not to the Head of State, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
I pick out “Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts, but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the Community would be irrevocable; we should therefore to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the statute of Westminster. In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the Council, or other appropriate organ of the Community, its substantive powers of legislating over the whole area of a very important field…..To confer a sovereign state’s treaty making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully federal state…..although the treaty-making is vested in the crown, Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation (to take two examples), and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents. But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws”. (End of quotes) The part that Her Majesty might have played in this, was not entered into. I hardly think that Edward Heath told Her Majesty, “We are going to sign this Treaty and by the time the end goal is completed, there will be no Country left for you to be Queen of”, was ever mentioned to her. After all, we are talking of honourable important influential gentlemen that WE, the people, have put into Government. Did our politicians tell us the terrible awful truth? If they could not find the guts to tell the ordinary people, I doubt very much they found the courage to tell her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. Did they tell us two years after when we were asked to vote to remain in this living lie?
The politician’s of this Country entered into a Treaty which they knew from before joining, was incompatible with our Constitution. Cases proving this fact had already made this very clear. Yet still they joined. They knew also that joining the Convention on Human Rights would be incompatible with our Constitution, yet still they joined. The politician’s put their ambitions before their Country. They kept the awful truth of the situation away from the people, and I believe it was also kept away from Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The arguments back and forth in the 1970’s were between the politicians in the same way that they were during the debates on citizenship (a momentous decision that affected every one of us) at Maastricht, and now in this present day, we have the same false pretences, that all is well and that the EU constitution is nothing for us to worry our little heads about.
The Cabinet Papers of 1949 released under the thirty year rule, only five years after world war two in which so many people died fighting for this country to remain free of German domination, prove beyond any shadow of doubt the true nature in what form the creation of the proposed forming of the European Community would be. Recorded in Hansard on 16th November 1966 by speaker Mr Stanley Orme MP, “At a private meeting in the House, M Spaak, who was prominent in the setting up of the Community, explained his concept of what the European Community should be and what it should entail, and his explanation sent shivers down the spines of some of my hon. Friends who are very pro-European. M Spaak’s political concept is that of many statesmen, particularly among the five, excluding France. It is a political issue which we must seriously consider. M Spaak is against the entry of neutrals. He regards the Community purely as an extension of the military based NATO., a further extension of a military alliance. I do not attribute those views to all of my hon. Friends who faviour our entry, but I know that there are many hon. Members on both sides of the House who are interested in the Community not just as an economic unit but as a political unit too. They regard it as a supranational authority of which Britain should be part.” I have read hundreds of such pages and I wonder how any politician can still hold their heads up for they should hang them in shame forever more. And “today’s” MP’s want to strip Lord Archer of his title? He at least served his sentence.
I will end with Lord Kilmuir’s warning, “I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serous ones and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade Parliament or the public to accept them. I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objection to them. But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging affect later on”. We were not told. And I come to the conclusion that the price for remaining in and accepting the EU constitution is far too high a price to pay.
It was an absolute betrayal of all the people’s trust, it was sheer treachery then and it is absolute treachery now. The Politicians are right in one thing only. Politicians have not changed, only their names have changed, and I am left feeling very sorry that Guy Fawkes was not successful in his gunpowder plot.
Even before 1972 the people were betrayed by people at the very height of their career, by privileged people that were highly paid, some “honoured” by a special title, while the ordinary man was struggling to make ends meet and make a decent life for themselves and their family.
These ordinary people generally obeyed the law-worked hard-down pits, in factories on the land-yet saw their laws they were diligently obeying become trashed-cheapened-tarnished-rubbished and ignored and while standards slipped, even free speech the people had taken for granted became redundant, usurped by “politically correctness”.
Over recent years we have seen our Monarchy devalued-sidelined in every way. The Royal Yacht removed, the Royal ‘plane no longer available while the Prime Minister of the day treats himself like a President of the United Kingdom of Great Britain.
Recently, onslaughts have been made by certain members of the Government to bring forward Private Member’s “Succession to the Crown and Royal Marriages” Bill that would result in the unravelling of our Common Law Constitution. Deliberate attempts to destroy our Monarchy and Common Law Constitution.
Some in Parliament have said that there will be no change to our constitution by the ratifying of the EU Constitution. It is a “tidying up exercise”, “even a Golf Club has a Constitution” etc. These are very important prominent people, their word is their bond and therefore they are to be believed implicitly. The first eminent person to tell us “there would be no loss of essential Sovereignty” was Edward Heath, now Sir Edward! Yet here we have the proposed EU Constitution which states quite clearly that it has supremacy over our constitution and laws.
We have come to learn from the people of Iraq the high regard they have in forming their own Constitution. They have put their lives at risk by walking down their streets to place their “democratic” crosses on their voting forms. They value the “democracy” that our own Government are removing from US.
Citizenship of the European Union.
Each ratified new EU Treaty has resulted in the transferring of more national sovereignty to the European Union, for with the Maastricht Treaty one of the biggest changes was, from a “Community”(of nation states working together-a free association of sovereign states) to, as the title suggests a “Union”, a political entity, a new creation. It became a highly centralised creation. We also became “citizens” of this Union and there is an argument for realising that because the United Kingdom is a subordinate constituent of the European Union, must we consider that our citizenship is subordinate to EU citizenship? And if not now, will this happen when the EU has gathered for itself more authority through the EU constitution? Where will allegiance lie? Is it with the laws of the European Union or with the United Kingdom? Can one create a citizenship without a STATE? To add insult to injury, acceptance of EU Citizenship was not a voluntary matter, we had to accept it, and it was thrust upon us.
We should ask ourselves, what is the point in creating European Citizenship? The answer has to be for the creating of one State, and an obligation by the citizen to that state. The Commission proposed that the European Citizen would have the right of free residence and movement and a right to vote in local and European parliamentary elections, (municipal) and it said that targets for the definition of the individuals civic, economic and social rights would be set at a later stage. There is also a question of what the word “municipal” means, does it mean, ‘local’ or ‘national’ and in the end it will surely be the European Court of Justice that decides. Food for thought?
The Encyclopaedia Britannica defines “citizenship” as the “relationship between an individual and state, defined by the law of that state, with corresponding duties and rights”, so the new state can decide and change those duties anytime it wants to. We have been given “new” rights in the charter of fundamental rights. One thing we have not been given “is the RIGHT to say “NO”. We were never given the chance by the EU or our Government, for they did not ask whether we wanted EU citizenship.
We are told not to worry, it is only “additional to”, an “add on”, a bonus” not “in place of”, so WHAT is the point of it? Accept the EU constitution and then ask where will our oaths of allegiance lie? Will it be in conflict with our oath to the Queen? Perhaps we should change our loyal oath and then it will not be in conflict? That change to our oath is happening now (SOCA and police) yet these changes are contrary to our Constitution. According to R v Thistlewood 1820, to destroy the Constitution is “an act of treason”. If that action is an act of treason-repeal the Treason Acts then? This has happened already. I would like you to think about this puzzle. What if the European Court of Justice decided that the Oath of Allegiance to our Queen was superseded by a superior allegiance owed to a different political organisation such as the European Union? The Constitution we have recently accepted knowing and agreeing that it is superior even to our highest Court, and cabinet, proving eventually that the European Union citizenship we thought was additional to, is now superior to our British citizenship? What then? Can any Government of this Country afford to take a chance? Is it not being the tiniest bit reckless with our country?
Simply using the European Communities Act to remove this Country from the Union after ratification of the EU constitution may well bring down scorn from the Union. What about the Exit clause that this Country’s Government have ‘freely and willingly’ agreed to? Try and get the other 24 states (that might no longer exist) to agree?
We are only just beginning to realise just how precious “citizenship”, is to us. It is an attribute most dear to an individual, and primarily acquired by virtue of birth. If it is not acquired by birth, citizenship is acquired by conscious and carefully considered application-in this country by a process of naturalisation.
There is no doubt that this EU citizenship comes within the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Therefore, the duties imposed by the Treaty (of Maastricht and any further treaties) will be adjudicated upon by the European Court of Justice. When we consider that the European Court of Justice describes itself in political terms as the agent for greater federalism, we should sit up and take note of that fact. It is also important to note that the preamble is justiciable and something the European Court of Justice is obliged to take into account.
With citizenship goes the right to deny oneself citizenship, in other words, to give it up. We cannot repeal the EU citizenship that has been “bestowed” upon us. It has been suggested that the only way in which a “European national” could renounce his European citizenship is to renounce the nationality of his birth or the nationality he acquired by naturalisation. This makes a nonsense because in international law, no one is allowed to be “stateless”. Why did I, along with many others renounce our European Citizenship? This came about after the Home Secretary gave himself the powers to remove the citizenship of a person born here in the UK. The thought was by renouncing the one citizenship-EU-we could not then have our British citizenship removed, leaving us simply with EU citizenship.
What is the purpose of citizenship of the EU? We can read that “Citizens shall be subject to the duties imposed” but nowhere are those duties made clear. Only a fool signs a contract without knowing what their “duties” are. What if it is a ‘duty’ to pay taxes? To eventually have our youth “conscripted” into a Euro Army? This was brought home to us very recently over our involvement in Iraq, when other countries, quite correctly used their own authority to keep out of it. In an EU State, we would have to do as we are told. If a European State decides that its forces are to go into Iraq, we would have to conform because our EU citizenship will eventually place a duty and an obligation on us to abide by their orders.
Union Citizenship cannot be acquired alone, nor can it be forfeited without giving up nationality. EU Citizenship becomes a nightmare. It becomes like Ivy that clings to another living plant until eventually it strangles the life out of that that gave it life in the first place.
I have placed a great deal of emphasis on EU Citizenship, because there is a great deal in the proposed EU documentation, from schools to old age on “deeper and more meaningful EU citizenship. And a proposed increase for “town” and or “schools” for “twinning” (Wasn’t there an Oath made in that too?).
How does Citizenship affect the Queen?
Her Majesty has British citizenship for she was born here in the United Kingdom of Great Britain-she wasn’t always Queen (and was not expected to be Queen) and she served in the armed services during the last war. She is therefore as British as they come. More-over, and I quote Sir Ivan Lawrence here (Hansard 1st Feb 1993 Col 68) “It is generally accepted by international lawyers, as well as by the Home Secretary and the Government, that Her Majesty the Queen is pre-eminently the British citizen and is therefore subject to the law of the land as any citizen would be. The last member of the royal family who said that he was not a British citizen and that he was not subject to the laws and obligations of the land had a little walk further down Whitehall, which ended in the loss of an important part of his body and a number of years of civil war”.
It was also pointed out by Mr Spearing in response, “”Unlike the legislation of the Community, which would bind the duty of the monarch of legislation of this House, consequent on a legislative programme of the Community, under the intergovernmental parts of the treaty (Maastricht) that require a single process, it would become the duty of the Crown and its prerogative-meaning government, which traditionally has not been completely within the grasp of this House-to concur with whatever the intergovernmental institution decreed? For the first time, the prerogative of the Crown, as well as the Crown itself, would become subject to the macro-treaties of which we speak”.
Later on a Mr Wardle makes clears, “ The Maastricht Treaty does not in any way affect the constitutional position of the Monarch. Her Majesty as an individual would of course enjoy the same rights within the EC as any other United Kingdom citizen”. That statement (to me at least) makes clear that if the Queen enjoys the same rights she will incur the duties of European citizenship and like the rest of us will be so bound. Our Queen, Head of State, the supreme citizen of our political entity, would owe allegiance to some higher, wider authority-a superstate. Did Sir Edward Heath also point out once that the position of the Crown would not be affected by our entry into this Common market?
Just like we are all enjoying those same rights eh? Some remember John Major triumphantly saying that even the Queen was now a citizen of the European Community. We can see that without any doubt whatsoever, like us all, Her Majesty was not consulted, yet it was a decision and a commitment they made that day while debating the Maastricht Treaty it involved not just US, but our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. We also know now, without any doubt, that the Union is not going to be an open, decentralise, democratic Union, it is not even to become a federally run United States of Europe, but a unitary, centralised political social European Superstate. A Superstate that wants its own Constitution.
The Queen having been made a citizen of the Community would and especially if the EU Constitution is ratified, make her subordinate to the President of the Commission whoever it might be at that time. She might be called Queen, but as a citizen of that state, he/she will be President of the whole of the European Union. That also poses the question, who will take precedence at official functions?My goodness yes, EU Citizenship will eventually bring forth many changes, as it was always meant to, for there was absolutely no point in EU Citizenship if it meant nothing at all. Just to enhance? A concept?
From my reading of Hansard, and the way our MP’s debated the subject, it becomes obvious, without any doubt what-so-ever that the Queen was never asked, was never consulted, and was treated in exactly the same way as the people of this Country. As an aside, I will also add that the reading of Hansard books from the 1950’s-1975’s to after the Treaty of Rome was signed, the same thing happened then.
Loss of Sovereignty.
It has been said (at times) that we lost “sovereignty” through being in NATO. There is no comparison between NATO, a free association of independent states and the European Union in terms of conferring obligation on citizens. NATO is such a free association of independent states that the French, since De Gaulle’s time, have decided, in their own sovereign manner, to remain independent of NATO’s integrated military structure. Certainly NATO have never made people “citizens” of their organisation. A different kind of treaty altogether from EU Treaties.
What if the people vote “NO” to the EU constitution?
It has been said that if we vote “NO” to the EU Constitution, the other States could go on without us. That they could repeal the Treaties for the making of one Constitution. If that happened there would be no Treaties left for us to BE in. Yet if we look to the Vienna Convention on the law of Treaties, it allows for some of the parties to a treaty to decide to modify the treaty/treaties among themselves, as long as any alteration does not affect the rights of the others that prefer to go on/stay behind. (Difficult though!) A Treaty such as The Treaty on Union 1707 between Scotland and England would be fine if all the people and governments of each Country were to agree, BUT even that Treaty between two Countries (not 25) there are complications, for there are no longer two separate Parliaments/Governments. One devolved now-with limited authority and one United Kingdom Parliament-no English Parliament. Under the current rules of Article 48 of the European Union, all member states must give their agreement to the changes. If more than one state says “NO”, they are legally entitled to stick to that view and prevent the others from going ahead.
If a country says “NO” to the EU Constitution: I suggest the exact opposite may well be the case: the old treaties remain in force and there is no new structure which the “Yes” countries could adhere to, or existing structure for them to hold on to. No further pressure of retaking a referendum to make them fall into line, or “to get it right”. The people will have spoken. The great danger is that much of the proposed legislation in the EU Constitution may have already gone ahead via Regulation or Directive or the Hague Programme (will that be deemed illegal)? What will we be left to vote on, in a Constitution? Could Articles that have not gone through, be put forward again via Regulation? Will Governments, having seen the way the people have voted, decide to say no to EU Regulations? Want to press ahead regardless? What will be the reaction of the people?
Having been promised a Referendum on the EU Constitution, this Country must have a referendum whether other countries have already voted it down or not. This is essential if only to find out the depth of feeling in this Country towards the European Union. It is vitally important that a referendum takes place. Will our Members of Parliament go knocking on doors during the general election or the referendum, saying vote for me because I want to give all the sovereignty (authority) we have left to the European Union? I want to make sure that all decisions that will affect this Country-forever- go where we want it to go-to the great European Union? Is that what they will say? All in the name of peace and goodwill? Is it truly theirs to give? Will our Parliamentarians still expect to be elected to Parliament and get paid handsomely for a job they no longer do? Just like nodding donkey’s rubber stamping EU legislation through for the people of this Country to obey, as usual?
What about “Our” Courts?
Many ordinary people concerned at the way our own ministers are willingly and eagerly giving away sovereignty of this Country to the European Union, have taken the momentous decision to look to the Courts of this Island under “Misprision of Treason”, to ‘stay’ the hands that would treasonously undermine our Common Law Constitution and thus destroy it. None so far has succeeded. Why? All our MP’s swear Allegiance to the Queen. All our Judges swear Allegiance to the Queen, and they sit in front of the Royal Coat of Arms, and in fact, they are there to represent the Queen. So where does it all go wrong? When ordinary people try to do their duty, when they can see their own parliamentarians ceding sovereignty of this Country to the Union and the governing of this Country be determined by the Union, what or who is preventing them, or the Courts, from doing their duty?
The Union already refers to Courts, as “European Union” courts. The judges apply European Union Laws. They have to observe the Human Rights Act and if they do not apply Union law the European Court of Justice will in turn overrule them. There has been question of where Kompetenze Kompetenze lies? It is a question that no one seems able (or willing) to answer. The European Union’s Court of Justice on the other hand, is not answerable to any nation state- it may be that it is answerable to no one. It sees itself as a tool for the creation and improvement of the European Union. It works solely for the ideals of the European Union and to further the Union’s progress on the world stage.
While we are busy destroying the independence and highly regarded Law Lords presently housed in the House of Lords, whose reputation has been formed over hundreds of years and has been the envy of many Countries all over the world, now do charge them eventually, to do their duties in a newly formed Supreme Court and by so doing allowing the interference from the political menagerie and thus align themselves with other Supreme Courts in the European Union.
Any dispute that arises, any system of Justice, or any terms of dispute regarding citizenship, the interpretation of direct EU laws or treaty and especially any dispute over the EU Constitution, any dispute ever the application of “British” justice, should the term British survive, will be decided by a European Court determined to develop further, the European Union. It will automatically supersede and crush the independence of what once was a nation state.
When people attended Court here in the UK, the Judges had a choice didn’t they? They could apply the law according to the oath they so swore, or they could apply the law of the European Union. I find it difficult to accept that a Judge can swear allegiance to the Queen whilst applying EU law, but then we have to remember that EU law comes to us because our governments have incorporated it (accepted it) into our Law-it is indeed our law. Isn’t it?
The people will have a choice, providing they are given a referendum that is fair and free from corruption. But even in an election in the past has anyone said, “vote for me and I will go about giving our country away to the Union to govern”. Not exactly a vote winner, is it? It is known that there was fraud during the all-postal voting experiment on the Regions, but the Government decided continue with all posting voting and not to “err on the side of caution”. Is that a green light for all parties to act fraudulently for surely, what is fair for the goose is fair for the gander?
Is the Treaty ESTABLISHING A Constitution for Europe, a “Treaty” or a “Constitution”?
What is a Constitution? I quote from the papers by Jean-Claude Piris, who was the Legal Advisor of the Council of the European Union and was the Legal Advisor of the intergovernmental conferences, which negotiated and adopted the Treaty of Maastricht and the Treaty of Amsterdam. He looked at Black’s Law Dictionary for the main elements of a Constitution.
• A constitution organises the government of the entity to which it applies; a Constitution prescribes the extent and manner of the exercise of sovereign powers.
• A Constitution is the absolute rule of action: any official act in breach of it is illegal (this presupposes a constitutional or supreme court)
• A Constitution frequently lists rights of the individual and guarantees their protection.
• A Constitution derives its authority from the governed and is agreed upon by the people;
• A constitution is the fundamental law of a nation of state. End of quotes.
Reading down those points, now begs the question, was our entry into the Common Market in 1972 illegal in the first place? From the reading of Hansard debates on the subject under the heading of “European Communities”, I believe it was illegal. These past few years, the ignoring of our Common Law Constitution by the Government, particularly where the British nationality is specifically mentioned for Magistrates and Police, has been ignored, yet Magna Carta, The Bill of Rights, The Act of Settlement and the Queens Coronation Oath remain the same for they cannot be altered, they are a contract between the people and the Monarch. I ask, are not these new Acts of Parliament illegal? Are they ultra vires? Can they be challenged? And can those that have fallen foul through the application of them, also challenge and overturn?
The EU Constitution is incorporated into our system by the “Treaty”, but once installed, the Constitution then takes over, in exactly the same way that using the European Communities Act to install the original Treaty of Rome, for once installed, the European Community’ laws overruled our Laws.
Some people have said that the Treaties that have gone before are “constitutional”, however, each treaty has been labelled quite clearly, a “Treaty”, the Treaty of Rome, the Treaty of Amsterdam etc. All previous European Community Treaties were developed through the usual diplomatic channels; finalised the same way and ratified by parliament (some through referendum) it has been suggested, (by the EU Parliament) for the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, that the people should have a referendum. Even the title, makes clear that to “establish” something, is to set up something “new” “something different”. The Treaty “ESTABLISHES” a Constitution for the European Union as a whole.
By using a “Convention” that took eighteen months to come to fruition, makes the Constitution very different from all the other EU treaties. All the articles in it that gives itself authority, legal personality, etc, makes it different, it also makes very clear that “the EU Constitution, and law adopted by the Union’s institutions in exercising competences conferred upon it, shall have primacy over the law of the Member states”. There is no getting away from that. It has to be remembered also, that it IS one constitution for all its member states.The European Union is lacking some essential elements for it to become the State it so obviously wants to become. And the United Kingdom still has not given away control of its economy, its sterling currency or reserves. But the EU Constitution will go a long way in allowing the Union to gather these elements together.It is as a signal for the beginning of the end of the Nation States.The dilemma of the High Court Judges and the Law Lords, the highest Judges in the land, now comes under scrutiny. As time went on our Judges must have known that their decisions would in the end destroy this County’s ability to govern itself, their decision in putting the European Union’s laws above their own country, as laid down in EU law, would remove the ability of this country’s Government from ever governing again, yet that is what they were doing, and that is what they were meant and had to do. As I see it, they had no option, they were putting into action what the politicians had bade them to do. That bidding was the acceptance of the European Union treaties, but who advised the politicians that signing these treaties would not remove sovereignty from this country? We now know the advice given to the then Edward Heath by Lord Kilmuir and I note that this advice was given to Edward Heath not to the Head of State, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
I pick out “Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts, but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the Community would be irrevocable; we should therefore to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the statute of Westminster. In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the Council, or other appropriate organ of the Community, its substantive powers of legislating over the whole area of a very important field…..To confer a sovereign state’s treaty making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully federal state…..although the treaty-making is vested in the crown, Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation (to take two examples), and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents. But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws”. (End of quotes) The part that Her Majesty might have played in this, was not entered into. I hardly think that Edward Heath told Her Majesty, “We are going to sign this Treaty and by the time the end goal is completed, there will be no Country left for you to be Queen of”, was ever mentioned to her. After all, we are talking of honourable important influential gentlemen that WE, the people, have put into Government. Did our politicians tell us the terrible awful truth? If they could not find the guts to tell the ordinary people, I doubt very much they found the courage to tell her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. Did they tell us two years after when we were asked to vote to remain in this living lie?
The politician’s of this Country entered into a Treaty which they knew from before joining, was incompatible with our Constitution. Cases proving this fact had already made this very clear. Yet still they joined. They knew also that joining the Convention on Human Rights would be incompatible with our Constitution, yet still they joined. The politician’s put their ambitions before their Country. They kept the awful truth of the situation away from the people, and I believe it was also kept away from Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The arguments back and forth in the 1970’s were between the politicians in the same way that they were during the debates on citizenship (a momentous decision that affected every one of us) at Maastricht, and now in this present day, we have the same false pretences, that all is well and that the EU constitution is nothing for us to worry our little heads about.
The Cabinet Papers of 1949 released under the thirty year rule, only five years after world war two in which so many people died fighting for this country to remain free of German domination, prove beyond any shadow of doubt the true nature in what form the creation of the proposed forming of the European Community would be. Recorded in Hansard on 16th November 1966 by speaker Mr Stanley Orme MP, “At a private meeting in the House, M Spaak, who was prominent in the setting up of the Community, explained his concept of what the European Community should be and what it should entail, and his explanation sent shivers down the spines of some of my hon. Friends who are very pro-European. M Spaak’s political concept is that of many statesmen, particularly among the five, excluding France. It is a political issue which we must seriously consider. M Spaak is against the entry of neutrals. He regards the Community purely as an extension of the military based NATO., a further extension of a military alliance. I do not attribute those views to all of my hon. Friends who faviour our entry, but I know that there are many hon. Members on both sides of the House who are interested in the Community not just as an economic unit but as a political unit too. They regard it as a supranational authority of which Britain should be part.” I have read hundreds of such pages and I wonder how any politician can still hold their heads up for they should hang them in shame forever more. And “today’s” MP’s want to strip Lord Archer of his title? He at least served his sentence.
I will end with Lord Kilmuir’s warning, “I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serous ones and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade Parliament or the public to accept them. I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objection to them. But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging affect later on”. We were not told. And I come to the conclusion that the price for remaining in and accepting the EU constitution is far too high a price to pay.
It was an absolute betrayal of all the people’s trust, it was sheer treachery then and it is absolute treachery now. The Politicians are right in one thing only. Politicians have not changed, only their names have changed, and I am left feeling very sorry that Guy Fawkes was not successful in his gunpowder plot.
Political Correctness: The Incubator of Islamism
Hat tip: Steve Thompson.
Amil Imani - 5/24/2007
Time and again we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We are repeatedly lectured that only a very small minority of Muslims are troublemakers who are giving the peaceful masses of Muslims a bad name. We are also informed that the terrorists, who happened to be Muslims, are the disaffected and the young. And not to worry, since as the fire of youth turns to ashes of old age the rebellious will mellow, as they always have.
With heavy assurances like this, coming from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can sleep soundly without the aid of sleeping pills. After all, people reason that these pundits are “experts” whose job is to know and tell it like it is. Those who voice contrary views must be a bunch of racist, alarmist hate mongers. Who is right?
Wouldn’t be more prudent to let the facts settle the matter, rather than blindly accepting either position? Of course it would, except for one huge problem. In the face of threats, people tend to go to the mind’s medicine cabinet and take a few denial and rationalization pills, in the same way that it is the aspirin bottle they turn to when a headache strikes. Why not? We are the Easy Species. We love effortless, quick and simple solutions. And that’s not invariably bad. It has given us all kinds of labor and time saving devices.
Yet, the Islam problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts, nor the tranquilizing pills of the mind can make it go away. It is here and it shows every sign of imposing itself on us. Let us look at some of the facts.
* Not every Muslim wears an explosive vest ready to detonate in the midst of a crowd of innocent civilians, yet there are more volunteers for the mission than there are explosive vests. The Islamic Republic of Iran, for instance, hasn’t even officially joined this form of jihad. Yet, by its own admission, it has over 10,000 volunteers trained ready to be deployed, and thousands more queuing to join in. This time around, the jihadists heading for Allah’s heaven might come fitted with nice little suitcases of dirty bombs instead of the bulky explosive vests. Recall that it took only 19 of these killers to launch the aerial mass murder of 9/11 that killed 3,000 people, shattered our open trusting way of life, and cost us billions of dollars.
* The jihadists are not confined to a minority of disaffected Muslim youth. How young are Bin Laden, his deputy doctor of death Al Zawahiri, mullah Omar of the Taliban, Khamenei and Refsanjani of Iran, just to name a few? How disaffected are they? Muhammad Ata, leader of the 19 airborne thugs and the decapitator of Wall Street Journal reporter Pearl were somewhat younger, yet well-healed and Western educated.
* Just coin some terms such as the “Melting Pot,” or “Multiculturalism” and you have the problem solved? Roll out the red carpet for the immigrant Muslims, treat them as you would your own citizens, give them stipends, medical care, and free education and they will integrate seamlessly into the society? No such thing at all. The idea of Melting Pot may work with people who come from different lands to make the new country their home. The Islamists, on the other hand, come with the belief that they already own the place and want to make it part of the Ummeh. Some forty percent of second and third generation Muslim Britons reject British democracy, express their allegiance to Islam and want to live under Sharia. So much for the Melting Pot comfort pill.
* The new Islamist arrivals take advantage of the provisions of the most benign system known to humanity, democracy, to implode it from within. Muslims, by sheer numbers, will soon be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They are already doing that in bits and pieces. They are imposing many of their values, in a number of societies, even while they are in the minority. Politicians, hungry for votes and devoted to the practice of political correctness bend backward to accede to Islamists’ demands.
* As for Multiculturalism, it is even more of a delusion than the Melting Pot myth. It is a second generation Comfort Pill. Since the Melting Pot proved to be worse than a placebo, the politically correct gave us the new pill. A glance at Europe shows how Multiculturalism in fact has served as the incubator of Islamism in no time at all. Europe’s Multiculturalism is rapidly birthing a Uniculturalism, if the Islamists’ medieval way of life can be dignified as a culture.
* Respect for diversity, separation of religion and state, freedom of belief and expression, are pillars of democracy, yet anathema to Islam. In no Islamic land do you find an ecumenical organization. It is only in non-Islamic countries that the shameless duplicitous Muslim, be he an imam, a mullah, or a regular run-of-the- mill faithful of Allah, meekly participates in ecumenical feel-good gatherings.
* To Muslims, no other religion is deemed worthy of recognition, much less accommodation. There is not a single church or synagogue or a Buddhist temple in all of Saudi Arabia. They are barred. The Islamic Republic of Iran’s raft of genocidal pogroms includes the heinous practice of bulldozing even the cemeteries of its Baha’i religious minority. The Islamic tyranny of the mullahs imprisons Christian Iranians for celebrating Christmas. Egypt denies its own citizens identity cards for refusing to lie and fake their religious belief or disbelief. The ID cards are required for education, securing work, receiving medical care and just about every right of citizenship. Without it, a citizen is literally subjected to slow death.
* In Islam only Muslim men, and, to a lesser extent, Muslim women, are entitled to certain rights. All non-Muslims, including the so-called people of the book, namely Christians and Jews, are at best second-class subject, subjects who must pay the back-breaking Jezyyeh, poll tax, for their “sin” of not converting to Islam. So, as Islam makes its inroads in new lands, as its membership swells through explosive birth and conversion, secular democracies will be inevitably replaced by Islamism with its stone-age Sharia laws. The best offer that Islam will make is to spare the non-Muslim’s life if he puts on the heavy yoke of Jezyyeh for the rest of his living days.
* Not to worry about the horrific things that are happening on the other side of the world? If Muslims act heinously toward non-Muslims, it is just the way things are in those countries and it is hardly any of our business? This is the same attitude that set Islamization of Europe on a seemingly irreversible track. One European country after another is rapidly buckling under the weight of Islamism.
* Most importantly, not to worry about Islamization of our country? After all, Muslims are about 6-7 million minority in a population of nearly 300 million, you reason? That even a smaller number of these Muslims are hothead radicals, while the majority is just like everyone else? But small minorities can overwhelm the majority by use of coercion and deadly force. Islamists are notorious for their dedication to the use of force for achieving their aims. The Taliban were a very small minority in Afghanistan, the Islamists were a tiny faction in the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran. Both overwhelmed the masses and imposed their reign of terror. The terrorist Hamas is also a “minority” in number, yet it rules the Palestinian Territory. Hizbollah of Lebanon is a minority, yet it has taken the country to the verge of destruction.
* Islamists are Islam’s locomotive that takes the wrecking-ball Islamic train on its demolition course. Islam and democracy are incompatible. As democracies practice their magnificent accommodating belief, they knowingly or unknowingly lay the track for the advancing wrecking train of Islam. We, in the United States of America must resist Islamism while it is still gathering momentum, unless we wish to end up in the same fix as the Europeans.
* We, in the United States, further need to embark on a comprehensive legal, educational, and social campaign to eradicate the deadly plague of Islam. By effective action, we even save those peaceful Muslims from their own affliction. I am not hatemongering. I would love to see all Muslims become ex-Muslims and full-fledged members of a diverse tolerant democratic society. It is a statement of fact about what Islam is. Islam is a highly communicable pandemic violent disease that demands urgent and serious containment.
Europe is already badly infected with Islamism. It is the coal-miners’ canary. It is telling us that the next stop is America. We must act and act now. We must not sacrifice our cherished way of life and the lives of our children at the altar of political correctness: the incubator of Islamofascism.
Amil Imani is an Iranian born, pro-democracy activist who resides in the United States of America. He is a poet, writer, literary translator, novelist and an essayist who has been writing and speaking out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. Amil Imani's Home Page: www.amilimani.com
Amil Imani - 5/24/2007
Time and again we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We are repeatedly lectured that only a very small minority of Muslims are troublemakers who are giving the peaceful masses of Muslims a bad name. We are also informed that the terrorists, who happened to be Muslims, are the disaffected and the young. And not to worry, since as the fire of youth turns to ashes of old age the rebellious will mellow, as they always have.
With heavy assurances like this, coming from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can sleep soundly without the aid of sleeping pills. After all, people reason that these pundits are “experts” whose job is to know and tell it like it is. Those who voice contrary views must be a bunch of racist, alarmist hate mongers. Who is right?
Wouldn’t be more prudent to let the facts settle the matter, rather than blindly accepting either position? Of course it would, except for one huge problem. In the face of threats, people tend to go to the mind’s medicine cabinet and take a few denial and rationalization pills, in the same way that it is the aspirin bottle they turn to when a headache strikes. Why not? We are the Easy Species. We love effortless, quick and simple solutions. And that’s not invariably bad. It has given us all kinds of labor and time saving devices.
Yet, the Islam problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts, nor the tranquilizing pills of the mind can make it go away. It is here and it shows every sign of imposing itself on us. Let us look at some of the facts.
* Not every Muslim wears an explosive vest ready to detonate in the midst of a crowd of innocent civilians, yet there are more volunteers for the mission than there are explosive vests. The Islamic Republic of Iran, for instance, hasn’t even officially joined this form of jihad. Yet, by its own admission, it has over 10,000 volunteers trained ready to be deployed, and thousands more queuing to join in. This time around, the jihadists heading for Allah’s heaven might come fitted with nice little suitcases of dirty bombs instead of the bulky explosive vests. Recall that it took only 19 of these killers to launch the aerial mass murder of 9/11 that killed 3,000 people, shattered our open trusting way of life, and cost us billions of dollars.
* The jihadists are not confined to a minority of disaffected Muslim youth. How young are Bin Laden, his deputy doctor of death Al Zawahiri, mullah Omar of the Taliban, Khamenei and Refsanjani of Iran, just to name a few? How disaffected are they? Muhammad Ata, leader of the 19 airborne thugs and the decapitator of Wall Street Journal reporter Pearl were somewhat younger, yet well-healed and Western educated.
* Just coin some terms such as the “Melting Pot,” or “Multiculturalism” and you have the problem solved? Roll out the red carpet for the immigrant Muslims, treat them as you would your own citizens, give them stipends, medical care, and free education and they will integrate seamlessly into the society? No such thing at all. The idea of Melting Pot may work with people who come from different lands to make the new country their home. The Islamists, on the other hand, come with the belief that they already own the place and want to make it part of the Ummeh. Some forty percent of second and third generation Muslim Britons reject British democracy, express their allegiance to Islam and want to live under Sharia. So much for the Melting Pot comfort pill.
* The new Islamist arrivals take advantage of the provisions of the most benign system known to humanity, democracy, to implode it from within. Muslims, by sheer numbers, will soon be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They are already doing that in bits and pieces. They are imposing many of their values, in a number of societies, even while they are in the minority. Politicians, hungry for votes and devoted to the practice of political correctness bend backward to accede to Islamists’ demands.
* As for Multiculturalism, it is even more of a delusion than the Melting Pot myth. It is a second generation Comfort Pill. Since the Melting Pot proved to be worse than a placebo, the politically correct gave us the new pill. A glance at Europe shows how Multiculturalism in fact has served as the incubator of Islamism in no time at all. Europe’s Multiculturalism is rapidly birthing a Uniculturalism, if the Islamists’ medieval way of life can be dignified as a culture.
* Respect for diversity, separation of religion and state, freedom of belief and expression, are pillars of democracy, yet anathema to Islam. In no Islamic land do you find an ecumenical organization. It is only in non-Islamic countries that the shameless duplicitous Muslim, be he an imam, a mullah, or a regular run-of-the- mill faithful of Allah, meekly participates in ecumenical feel-good gatherings.
* To Muslims, no other religion is deemed worthy of recognition, much less accommodation. There is not a single church or synagogue or a Buddhist temple in all of Saudi Arabia. They are barred. The Islamic Republic of Iran’s raft of genocidal pogroms includes the heinous practice of bulldozing even the cemeteries of its Baha’i religious minority. The Islamic tyranny of the mullahs imprisons Christian Iranians for celebrating Christmas. Egypt denies its own citizens identity cards for refusing to lie and fake their religious belief or disbelief. The ID cards are required for education, securing work, receiving medical care and just about every right of citizenship. Without it, a citizen is literally subjected to slow death.
* In Islam only Muslim men, and, to a lesser extent, Muslim women, are entitled to certain rights. All non-Muslims, including the so-called people of the book, namely Christians and Jews, are at best second-class subject, subjects who must pay the back-breaking Jezyyeh, poll tax, for their “sin” of not converting to Islam. So, as Islam makes its inroads in new lands, as its membership swells through explosive birth and conversion, secular democracies will be inevitably replaced by Islamism with its stone-age Sharia laws. The best offer that Islam will make is to spare the non-Muslim’s life if he puts on the heavy yoke of Jezyyeh for the rest of his living days.
* Not to worry about the horrific things that are happening on the other side of the world? If Muslims act heinously toward non-Muslims, it is just the way things are in those countries and it is hardly any of our business? This is the same attitude that set Islamization of Europe on a seemingly irreversible track. One European country after another is rapidly buckling under the weight of Islamism.
* Most importantly, not to worry about Islamization of our country? After all, Muslims are about 6-7 million minority in a population of nearly 300 million, you reason? That even a smaller number of these Muslims are hothead radicals, while the majority is just like everyone else? But small minorities can overwhelm the majority by use of coercion and deadly force. Islamists are notorious for their dedication to the use of force for achieving their aims. The Taliban were a very small minority in Afghanistan, the Islamists were a tiny faction in the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran. Both overwhelmed the masses and imposed their reign of terror. The terrorist Hamas is also a “minority” in number, yet it rules the Palestinian Territory. Hizbollah of Lebanon is a minority, yet it has taken the country to the verge of destruction.
* Islamists are Islam’s locomotive that takes the wrecking-ball Islamic train on its demolition course. Islam and democracy are incompatible. As democracies practice their magnificent accommodating belief, they knowingly or unknowingly lay the track for the advancing wrecking train of Islam. We, in the United States of America must resist Islamism while it is still gathering momentum, unless we wish to end up in the same fix as the Europeans.
* We, in the United States, further need to embark on a comprehensive legal, educational, and social campaign to eradicate the deadly plague of Islam. By effective action, we even save those peaceful Muslims from their own affliction. I am not hatemongering. I would love to see all Muslims become ex-Muslims and full-fledged members of a diverse tolerant democratic society. It is a statement of fact about what Islam is. Islam is a highly communicable pandemic violent disease that demands urgent and serious containment.
Europe is already badly infected with Islamism. It is the coal-miners’ canary. It is telling us that the next stop is America. We must act and act now. We must not sacrifice our cherished way of life and the lives of our children at the altar of political correctness: the incubator of Islamofascism.
Amil Imani is an Iranian born, pro-democracy activist who resides in the United States of America. He is a poet, writer, literary translator, novelist and an essayist who has been writing and speaking out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. Amil Imani's Home Page: www.amilimani.com
STATE OF THE COUNTRY, WHAT BLAIR SHOULD SAY
Well here I am, just six weeks to go and then my good friend Gordon will take over and I thought that this would be a good time to sum up my past ten years in office as Prime Minister of the Country.
We were fortunate when we (I) came to power, there was a good economy and a reasonably happy population, this had to change after all a happy population does not usually vote Labour, social unrest and a failing economy is what usually motivates the proletariat, so I set about my quest.
I had to find a way of spending this money, education that was it, so I set about reforming a good education system into a shambles and still managed to convince the public that the changes were good.
Education was taken out of the hands of educators, the Government (me) told the schools, colleges and Universities what to teach, made them reduce standards so everybody could pass the exams thus de-valuing the qualifications, poured money into the system aimed at promoting non academic subjects such as pottery and media studies and look what we have achieved, we have a generation who by the age of 10
Cannot read and are innumerate, and the Degree from most British Universities is not accepted anywhere in the world, and that includes Afghanistan.
I turned good Polytechnics into bad Universities, that was a good one because it meant that the costs would go up and the standards fall.
The Health Service was my second target.
Millions were put in, the administration doubled and in some cases even trebled but the best bit was in the use of targets and waiting list times, we found a way of reducing them by the way they were counted but this did not shorten the actual time spent on a waiting list –brilliant
The GP’s were awarded huge pay rises for doing much less work.
By now the money was beginning to run out so I asked Gordon to come up with some inventive ideas to raise taxation, “Stealth taxes” were born and we have had about 80 of them, the latest being “green taxes”.
This money was needed to finance the second stage of my terms in power. And that was the dismantling of the British way of life and at the same time create a vote base, which would enable Labour to stay in power.
Mass immigration was the answer, after 9/11 it was clear that there was a large number of people, Muslims, who wanted to destroy the Ideals and values of the west, who better to do the job for me.
I opened the borders and they flooded in and were given housing, money, heath care and preference over the existing population, they immediately started attacking the British way of life- perfect, the plan was working.
The next stage was the Human rights Bill, my wife (the wicked witch of the west) and I used to stay up at night thinking of legislation that we could put through the Commons, that would breach this Act, she could then challenge this in court, win and get paid a fat fee for doing so (well I do have a mortgage to pay).
More and more flooded in, the benefits bill was rising, more happy labour voters, Gordon introduced the flight surcharge on all passengers of £ 40
7/7 happened, this really annoyed the public and me so I thought we had better do something, Various anti terror bills were passed, this enabled Human Rights lawyers to make a mint and we still have not managed to deport anybody, after all how can we send these people back to a place where they may come to some harm.
The success of this policy is clear; we now have about 3000 active jihadis in the UK and numerous terrorist cells working away to destroy the British society.
This policy has been so successful that the US is going to stop its Visa Waver system for UK citizens, how good is that and all air travellers are now subjected to ignominious searches before they get on a plane (unless they are wearing a Hijab or Nikab and that includes men).
I would like to say a few words about crime, there is a lot of it in the UK, I have taken steps to ensure that the police force cannot do its job properly; it is riddled with political correctness.
Criminals from all over Europe and the Middle East are coming here showing new ways of being a criminal.
We have however contributed greatly to the reduction in Passport forgery, at one time the UK passport was the most expensive on the black market, this is no longer the case as people can now just walk in thus we have effectively reduced crime.
To sum up, we now have a country that has got a bad education system, the health service is in meltdown, a Police force that does not work and we are importing criminals and an immigration problem second to none.
Not bad for ten years is it.
Thank you and goodbye, I’m off to make £40 million
Well... That's how it would be if Gandalf said it.
We were fortunate when we (I) came to power, there was a good economy and a reasonably happy population, this had to change after all a happy population does not usually vote Labour, social unrest and a failing economy is what usually motivates the proletariat, so I set about my quest.
I had to find a way of spending this money, education that was it, so I set about reforming a good education system into a shambles and still managed to convince the public that the changes were good.
Education was taken out of the hands of educators, the Government (me) told the schools, colleges and Universities what to teach, made them reduce standards so everybody could pass the exams thus de-valuing the qualifications, poured money into the system aimed at promoting non academic subjects such as pottery and media studies and look what we have achieved, we have a generation who by the age of 10
Cannot read and are innumerate, and the Degree from most British Universities is not accepted anywhere in the world, and that includes Afghanistan.
I turned good Polytechnics into bad Universities, that was a good one because it meant that the costs would go up and the standards fall.
The Health Service was my second target.
Millions were put in, the administration doubled and in some cases even trebled but the best bit was in the use of targets and waiting list times, we found a way of reducing them by the way they were counted but this did not shorten the actual time spent on a waiting list –brilliant
The GP’s were awarded huge pay rises for doing much less work.
By now the money was beginning to run out so I asked Gordon to come up with some inventive ideas to raise taxation, “Stealth taxes” were born and we have had about 80 of them, the latest being “green taxes”.
This money was needed to finance the second stage of my terms in power. And that was the dismantling of the British way of life and at the same time create a vote base, which would enable Labour to stay in power.
Mass immigration was the answer, after 9/11 it was clear that there was a large number of people, Muslims, who wanted to destroy the Ideals and values of the west, who better to do the job for me.
I opened the borders and they flooded in and were given housing, money, heath care and preference over the existing population, they immediately started attacking the British way of life- perfect, the plan was working.
The next stage was the Human rights Bill, my wife (the wicked witch of the west) and I used to stay up at night thinking of legislation that we could put through the Commons, that would breach this Act, she could then challenge this in court, win and get paid a fat fee for doing so (well I do have a mortgage to pay).
More and more flooded in, the benefits bill was rising, more happy labour voters, Gordon introduced the flight surcharge on all passengers of £ 40
7/7 happened, this really annoyed the public and me so I thought we had better do something, Various anti terror bills were passed, this enabled Human Rights lawyers to make a mint and we still have not managed to deport anybody, after all how can we send these people back to a place where they may come to some harm.
The success of this policy is clear; we now have about 3000 active jihadis in the UK and numerous terrorist cells working away to destroy the British society.
This policy has been so successful that the US is going to stop its Visa Waver system for UK citizens, how good is that and all air travellers are now subjected to ignominious searches before they get on a plane (unless they are wearing a Hijab or Nikab and that includes men).
I would like to say a few words about crime, there is a lot of it in the UK, I have taken steps to ensure that the police force cannot do its job properly; it is riddled with political correctness.
Criminals from all over Europe and the Middle East are coming here showing new ways of being a criminal.
We have however contributed greatly to the reduction in Passport forgery, at one time the UK passport was the most expensive on the black market, this is no longer the case as people can now just walk in thus we have effectively reduced crime.
To sum up, we now have a country that has got a bad education system, the health service is in meltdown, a Police force that does not work and we are importing criminals and an immigration problem second to none.
Not bad for ten years is it.
Thank you and goodbye, I’m off to make £40 million
Well... That's how it would be if Gandalf said it.
A Warning for America and UK From South Africa
This article is from The Green Arrow
This article that was sent me by a friend refers specifically to America but I think they could also apply to every civilized Country threatened by mass immigration. Let’s read it.
By Gemma Meyer (Gemma Meyer is the pseudonym of a South African journalist. She and her husband, a former conservative member of parliament, still reside in South Africa.)
People used to say that South Africa was 20 years behind the rest of the Western world. Television, for example, came late to South Africa (but so did pornography and the gay rights movement).
Today, however, South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveal trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country.
America's structures are Western. Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates. But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your Western character.
Writing letters to the press, manning stands at county fairs, hosting fund-raising dinners, attending rallies, setting up conferences, writing your Congressman - that is what you know, and what you are comfortable with. Those are the political methods you've created for yourselves to keep your country on track and to ensure political accountability.
But woe to you if - or more likely, when - the rules change. White Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America. Unable to cope with the new rules of the game - violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusations of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial numbers, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power from the haves - Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in. They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life.
That is exactly what happened in South Africa. I know, because I was there and I saw it happen.
Faced with revolution in the streets, strikes, civil unrest and the sheer terror and murder practiced by Nelson Mandela's African National Congress (ANC), the white government simply capitulated in order to achieve "peace."
Westerners need peace. They need order and stability. They are builders and planners. But what we got was the peace of the grave for our society.
The Third World is different - different peoples with different pasts and different cultures. Yet Westerners continue to mistake the psychology of the Third World and its peoples. Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe are perfect examples of those mistakes. Sierra Leone is in perpetual civil war, and Zimbabwe - once the thriving, stable Rhodesia - is looting the very people (the white men) who feed the country. Yet Westerners do not admit that the same kind of savagery could come to America when enough immigrants of the right type assert themselves. The fact is, Americans are sitting ducks for Third World exploitation of the Western conscience of compassion.
Those in the West who forced South Africa to surrender to the ANC and its leaders did not consider Africa to be the dangerous, corrupt, and savage place it is now in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Those Western politicians now have a similar problem looming on their own doorsteps: the demand for power and treasure from the non-Western peoples inside the realm.
It is already too late for South Africa, but not for America if enough people strengthen their spine and take on the race terrorists, the armies of the “politically correct" and, most dangerous of all, the craven politicians who believe "compassionate conservatism" will buy them a few more votes, a few more days of peace.
White South Africans, you should remember, have been in that part of Africa for the same amount of time whites have inhabited North America; yet ultimately South Africans voted for their own suicide. We are not so very different from you.
We lost our country through skilful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of "oppression" and "racism," and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles' heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the "equality of man," and his "love your neighbor" philosophy - none of which are part of the Third World's history.
The mainline churches played a big role in the demise of Western influence throughout Africa, too; especially in South Africa. Today's tyrants were yesterday's mission-school proteges. Many dictators in Africa were men of the cloth. They knew their clerical collars would deflect criticism and obfuscate their real aims, which had nothing whatever to do with the "brotherhood of man."
Other tyrants, like the infamous Idi Amin, were trained and schooled by the whites themselves, at Oxford, Cambridge, and Harvard. After receiving the best from the West, they unleashed a resentful bloodlust against their benefactors.
From what I have seen and read thus far, I fear Americans will capitulate just as we did. Americans are, generally, a soft lot. They don't want to quarrel or obstruct the claims of those who believe they were wronged. They like peace and quiet, and they want to compromise and be nice.
A television program that aired in South Africa showed a town meeting somewhere in Southern California where people met to complain about falling standards in the schools. Whites who politely spoke at the meeting clearly resented the influx of Mexican immigrants into their community. When a handful of Chicanos at the back of the hall shouted and waved their hands at them, the whites simply shrunk back into their seats rather than tell the noisemakers to shut up. They didn't want to quarrel.
In America, the courts are still the final arbiters of society's laws. But what will happen when your future majority refuses to abide by court rulings - as in Zimbabwe. What will happen when the new majority says the judges are racists, and that they refuse to acknowledge "white man's justice"? What will happen when the courts are filled with their people, or their sympathizers? In California, Proposition 187 has already been overturned.
What will you do when the future non-white majority decides to change the names of streets and cities? What will you do when they no longer want to use money that carries the portraits of old, dead white "racists" and slave owners? Will you cave in, like you did on flying the Confederate flag? What about the national anthem? Your official language?
Don't laugh. When the "majority" took over in South Africa, the first targets were our national symbols.
In another generation, America may well face what Africa is now experiencing - invasions of private land by the "have-nots;" the decline in health care quality; roads and buildings in disrepair; the banishment of your history from the education of the young; the revolutionization of your justice system.
In South Africa today, only 9 percent of murderers end up in jail. Court dockets are regularly purchased and simply disappear. Magistrates can be bribed as can the prison authorities, making escapes commonplace. Vehicle and airplane licenses are regularly purchased, and forged school and university certificates are routine.
What would you think of the ritual slaughter of animals in your neighbour’s backyard? How do you clean up the blood and entrails that litter your suburban streets? How do you feel about the practice of witchcraft, in which the parts of young girls and boys are needed for "medicinal" purposes? How do you react to the burning of witches?
Don't laugh. All that is quite common in South Africa today.
Don't imagine that government officials caught with their fingers in the till will be punished. Excuses - like the need to overcome generations of white racism - will be found to exonerate the guilty.
In fact, known criminals will be voted into office because of a racial solidarity among the majority that doesn't exist among the whites. When Ian Smith of the old Rhodesia tried to stand up to the world, white South African politicians were among the Westerners pressuring him to surrender.
When Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe murders his political opponents, ignores unfavourable court decisions, terrorizes the population and siphons off millions from the state treasury for himself and his friends, South Africa's new President Thabo Mbeki holds his hand and declares his support. That just happened a few weeks ago.
Your tax dollars will go to those who don't earn and don't pay. In South Africa, organizations that used to have access to state funds such as old age homes, the arts, and veterans' services, are simply abandoned.
What will happen is that Western structures in America will be either destroyed from without, or transformed from within, used to suit the goals of the new rulers . And they will reign either through terror, as in Zimbabwe today, or exert other corrupt pressures to obtain, or buy votes. Once power is in the hands of aliens, don't expect loyalty or devotion to principle from those whose jobs are at stake. One of the most surprising and tragic components oe disaster in South Africa is how many previously anti-ANC whites simply moved to the other side.
Once you lose social, cultural, and political dominance, there is no getting it back again.
Unfortunately, your habits and values work against you. You cannot fight terror and street mobs with letters to your Congressmen. You cannot fight accusations of racism with prayer meetings. You cannot appeal to the goodness of your fellow man when the fellow man despises you for your weaknesses and hacks off the arms and legs of his political opponents.
To survive, Americans must never lose the power they now enjoy to people from alien cultures. Above all, don't put yourselves to the test of fighting only when your backs are against the wall. You will probably fail.
Millions around the world want your good life. But make no mistake: They care not for the high-minded ideals of Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, and your Constitution. What they want are your possessions, your power, and your status.
And they already know that their allies among you, the "human rights activists," the skilful lawyers and the left-wing politicians will fight for them, and not for you. They will exploit your compassion and your Christian charity, and your good will.
They have studied you, Mr. and Mrs. America, and they know your weaknesses well.
This article that was sent me by a friend refers specifically to America but I think they could also apply to every civilized Country threatened by mass immigration. Let’s read it.
By Gemma Meyer (Gemma Meyer is the pseudonym of a South African journalist. She and her husband, a former conservative member of parliament, still reside in South Africa.)
People used to say that South Africa was 20 years behind the rest of the Western world. Television, for example, came late to South Africa (but so did pornography and the gay rights movement).
Today, however, South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveal trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country.
America's structures are Western. Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates. But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your Western character.
Writing letters to the press, manning stands at county fairs, hosting fund-raising dinners, attending rallies, setting up conferences, writing your Congressman - that is what you know, and what you are comfortable with. Those are the political methods you've created for yourselves to keep your country on track and to ensure political accountability.
But woe to you if - or more likely, when - the rules change. White Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America. Unable to cope with the new rules of the game - violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusations of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial numbers, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power from the haves - Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in. They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life.
That is exactly what happened in South Africa. I know, because I was there and I saw it happen.
Faced with revolution in the streets, strikes, civil unrest and the sheer terror and murder practiced by Nelson Mandela's African National Congress (ANC), the white government simply capitulated in order to achieve "peace."
Westerners need peace. They need order and stability. They are builders and planners. But what we got was the peace of the grave for our society.
The Third World is different - different peoples with different pasts and different cultures. Yet Westerners continue to mistake the psychology of the Third World and its peoples. Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe are perfect examples of those mistakes. Sierra Leone is in perpetual civil war, and Zimbabwe - once the thriving, stable Rhodesia - is looting the very people (the white men) who feed the country. Yet Westerners do not admit that the same kind of savagery could come to America when enough immigrants of the right type assert themselves. The fact is, Americans are sitting ducks for Third World exploitation of the Western conscience of compassion.
Those in the West who forced South Africa to surrender to the ANC and its leaders did not consider Africa to be the dangerous, corrupt, and savage place it is now in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Those Western politicians now have a similar problem looming on their own doorsteps: the demand for power and treasure from the non-Western peoples inside the realm.
It is already too late for South Africa, but not for America if enough people strengthen their spine and take on the race terrorists, the armies of the “politically correct" and, most dangerous of all, the craven politicians who believe "compassionate conservatism" will buy them a few more votes, a few more days of peace.
White South Africans, you should remember, have been in that part of Africa for the same amount of time whites have inhabited North America; yet ultimately South Africans voted for their own suicide. We are not so very different from you.
We lost our country through skilful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of "oppression" and "racism," and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles' heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the "equality of man," and his "love your neighbor" philosophy - none of which are part of the Third World's history.
The mainline churches played a big role in the demise of Western influence throughout Africa, too; especially in South Africa. Today's tyrants were yesterday's mission-school proteges. Many dictators in Africa were men of the cloth. They knew their clerical collars would deflect criticism and obfuscate their real aims, which had nothing whatever to do with the "brotherhood of man."
Other tyrants, like the infamous Idi Amin, were trained and schooled by the whites themselves, at Oxford, Cambridge, and Harvard. After receiving the best from the West, they unleashed a resentful bloodlust against their benefactors.
From what I have seen and read thus far, I fear Americans will capitulate just as we did. Americans are, generally, a soft lot. They don't want to quarrel or obstruct the claims of those who believe they were wronged. They like peace and quiet, and they want to compromise and be nice.
A television program that aired in South Africa showed a town meeting somewhere in Southern California where people met to complain about falling standards in the schools. Whites who politely spoke at the meeting clearly resented the influx of Mexican immigrants into their community. When a handful of Chicanos at the back of the hall shouted and waved their hands at them, the whites simply shrunk back into their seats rather than tell the noisemakers to shut up. They didn't want to quarrel.
In America, the courts are still the final arbiters of society's laws. But what will happen when your future majority refuses to abide by court rulings - as in Zimbabwe. What will happen when the new majority says the judges are racists, and that they refuse to acknowledge "white man's justice"? What will happen when the courts are filled with their people, or their sympathizers? In California, Proposition 187 has already been overturned.
What will you do when the future non-white majority decides to change the names of streets and cities? What will you do when they no longer want to use money that carries the portraits of old, dead white "racists" and slave owners? Will you cave in, like you did on flying the Confederate flag? What about the national anthem? Your official language?
Don't laugh. When the "majority" took over in South Africa, the first targets were our national symbols.
In another generation, America may well face what Africa is now experiencing - invasions of private land by the "have-nots;" the decline in health care quality; roads and buildings in disrepair; the banishment of your history from the education of the young; the revolutionization of your justice system.
In South Africa today, only 9 percent of murderers end up in jail. Court dockets are regularly purchased and simply disappear. Magistrates can be bribed as can the prison authorities, making escapes commonplace. Vehicle and airplane licenses are regularly purchased, and forged school and university certificates are routine.
What would you think of the ritual slaughter of animals in your neighbour’s backyard? How do you clean up the blood and entrails that litter your suburban streets? How do you feel about the practice of witchcraft, in which the parts of young girls and boys are needed for "medicinal" purposes? How do you react to the burning of witches?
Don't laugh. All that is quite common in South Africa today.
Don't imagine that government officials caught with their fingers in the till will be punished. Excuses - like the need to overcome generations of white racism - will be found to exonerate the guilty.
In fact, known criminals will be voted into office because of a racial solidarity among the majority that doesn't exist among the whites. When Ian Smith of the old Rhodesia tried to stand up to the world, white South African politicians were among the Westerners pressuring him to surrender.
When Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe murders his political opponents, ignores unfavourable court decisions, terrorizes the population and siphons off millions from the state treasury for himself and his friends, South Africa's new President Thabo Mbeki holds his hand and declares his support. That just happened a few weeks ago.
Your tax dollars will go to those who don't earn and don't pay. In South Africa, organizations that used to have access to state funds such as old age homes, the arts, and veterans' services, are simply abandoned.
What will happen is that Western structures in America will be either destroyed from without, or transformed from within, used to suit the goals of the new rulers . And they will reign either through terror, as in Zimbabwe today, or exert other corrupt pressures to obtain, or buy votes. Once power is in the hands of aliens, don't expect loyalty or devotion to principle from those whose jobs are at stake. One of the most surprising and tragic components oe disaster in South Africa is how many previously anti-ANC whites simply moved to the other side.
Once you lose social, cultural, and political dominance, there is no getting it back again.
Unfortunately, your habits and values work against you. You cannot fight terror and street mobs with letters to your Congressmen. You cannot fight accusations of racism with prayer meetings. You cannot appeal to the goodness of your fellow man when the fellow man despises you for your weaknesses and hacks off the arms and legs of his political opponents.
To survive, Americans must never lose the power they now enjoy to people from alien cultures. Above all, don't put yourselves to the test of fighting only when your backs are against the wall. You will probably fail.
Millions around the world want your good life. But make no mistake: They care not for the high-minded ideals of Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, and your Constitution. What they want are your possessions, your power, and your status.
And they already know that their allies among you, the "human rights activists," the skilful lawyers and the left-wing politicians will fight for them, and not for you. They will exploit your compassion and your Christian charity, and your good will.
They have studied you, Mr. and Mrs. America, and they know your weaknesses well.
Pete Marshall said...
Just a note to say thank you to all who voted for me in the local elections for the Central ward. A great result, almost 26%.
It really must have put the fear of god into my main opposition from the Labour party (he of the loony haircut), judging by the relieved look and snarling comments made by him when the results were known, still last year 3rd this year 2nd and the next time I take on the loony left it will it be 1st place! They may have won this battle but the war is far from over.
Peter Marshall. Future BNP Councillor for Barnsley.
It really must have put the fear of god into my main opposition from the Labour party (he of the loony haircut), judging by the relieved look and snarling comments made by him when the results were known, still last year 3rd this year 2nd and the next time I take on the loony left it will it be 1st place! They may have won this battle but the war is far from over.
Peter Marshall. Future BNP Councillor for Barnsley.
Veronica said ......
Hi
just want to congratulate the bnp CANDIDATES that have done so very well in the elections it really is a brilliant result.
I'm a Barnsley lass living now near Doncaster and keep a close eye on my home town.
Good to see the folk there are not seccumbing to the constant cultural marxism brainwashing thats' going on.
We must all now start pushing ahead for the general election and get this country back out of the grip of the Marxist eu, and it's constantly pushing forward with the islamification programme that is keeps under raps with the eu/arab dialogue.
support siad the danish group..stop the islamification of denmark, this proving it is not a bnp imaginary dream to cause trouble.
9/11 07 siad organized a demo a march on Brussels to demand our rights to run our own nations free from their grasp. they hope for a million man march!
They as a group are not anti muslim { i am having read the history of islam } but i support them with their stance against the EU.
Take Care!
Cameron is on the list of uaf supporters ..very democratic?
Veronica.
just want to congratulate the bnp CANDIDATES that have done so very well in the elections it really is a brilliant result.
I'm a Barnsley lass living now near Doncaster and keep a close eye on my home town.
Good to see the folk there are not seccumbing to the constant cultural marxism brainwashing thats' going on.
We must all now start pushing ahead for the general election and get this country back out of the grip of the Marxist eu, and it's constantly pushing forward with the islamification programme that is keeps under raps with the eu/arab dialogue.
support siad the danish group..stop the islamification of denmark, this proving it is not a bnp imaginary dream to cause trouble.
9/11 07 siad organized a demo a march on Brussels to demand our rights to run our own nations free from their grasp. they hope for a million man march!
They as a group are not anti muslim { i am having read the history of islam } but i support them with their stance against the EU.
Take Care!
Cameron is on the list of uaf supporters ..very democratic?
Veronica.
When will we British learn to stop appeasing terror?
The ending of the Al Qaeda fertiliser bomb plot trial has posed crucial questions about the competence of MI5.
In particular, the assurances we were given after the 7/7 bombings, that the perpetrators had been unknown to the security service, have been shown to be utterly false.
Disturbing as that is by itself, the case also raises yet more pressing questions about whether Britain is even now acting effectively enough against the threat to this country from Islamist terrorism.
The fact is that Al Qaeda now sees Britain as both its principal target and its principal recruiting ground.
By its own admission, MI5 is monitoring no fewer than 200 terrorist networks, 1,600 identified individual terrorists and 30 known terrorist plots.
It says British Muslims are being indoctrinated with horrifying speed, and more terrorists are being recruited every day.
In truth, as our leading counterterrorist police officer, Peter Clarke, said last week, this country is facing a terrorist threat of a nature and scale it has simply never seen before.
This terrorism is part of a global holy war - and the dreadful thing is that it is recruiting British-born boys as its foot-soldiers against their own fellow citizens.
But our official class is still failing to take the action that is necessary to defeat this threat to our whole way of life.
Certainly, it is now aware of the enormous scale of the terror threat.
But it is still fighting it with both hands tied behind its back.
In particular, the Human Rights Act continues to make effective anti-terror policy almost impossible.
Only last week, the Government was prevented from deporting two Libyan terrorist suspects, even though they came here illegally and are deemed to pose a serious threat to our lives, because our judges have said no one can be sent anywhere that might not uphold their human rights.
The Government was originally begged by our security services not to pass the Human Rights Act precisely because of the danger it would pose to national security by tying us in such knots.
Ministers merely dismissed their concerns.
Now the same security services face the nightmare that Islamist terrorists will obtain a nuclear or other dirty bomb to use against Britain, with a human rights law that makes it more difficult to thwart such a terrible outcome.
Even worse than this, ministers seem to have no idea about the need to attack the ideology driving all this.
It is simply not enough to flush out the terrorist cells, vital though that clearly is.
We have to defeat the ideas driving some British Muslims to commit these acts in the first place.
The Government has started paying lip service to this.
It has spoken against the extremism of the Muslim Council of Britain, and is encouraging a wider range of truly 'moderate' Muslims to speak up.
And a few more extremists are being arrested. But at the same time, it is still appeasing radicalism.
It has become a cliche to say that most British Muslims are moderate.
Certainly, most of them undoubtedly would have no truck with terrorism or violence and encouragingly, a growing number are speaking out against Islamist extremism.
But extremist views are not confined to a few rogue elements.
Opinion polls suggest that more than 100,000 of our Muslim citizens think the July 2005 attacks in London were justified.
A report by the Policy Exchange think-tank revealed that around one third of British Muslims thought that if Muslims left the faith, they should be killed; and 37 per cent of 16-to-24-year-olds wanted to live in Britain under Sharia rather than English law.
These numbers subscribing to such extremist views are deeply disturbing. They swell the sea in which terrorism swims.
If this tide is to be held back, Islamist extremism in Britain must be stopped and British values reasserted and stoutly upheld.
To defeat such extremism, we have to make it abundantly clear that we will not give an inch to those who want to destroy our values.
But we appear instead to be doing nothing to stop the spread of radical Islamism.
Indeed, in a myriad different ways we are giving out the lethal message that we have neither the will nor the courage to defend our way of life.
British Muslims are being recruited in large numbers to terror because next to nothing is being done to stop it.
Last January, a Channel Four television Dispatches programme revealed that at certain mosques which were assumed to be moderate and which were even prominent in talking to other faiths, material was being preached and disseminated advocating such horrors as the murder of homosexuals, the beating of women and hatred of Christians and Jews.
Despite the Prime Minister's promise to outlaw the radical group Hizb ut Tahrir (which believes that Britain should be an Islamic state), the Government refuses to do so.
Yet, Ed Husain, an extremely brave former radical who has recanted, chillingly documents in his new book The Islamist the enormous influence of this group in telling countless British Muslims it's their duty to wage holy war, and that Muslims have a corresponding duty "to be prepared to launch attacks on Britain from within".
Not only are we failing to halt the spread of such lethally extremist views, we are also failing to hold the line for our own values.
Above all else, we should absolutely refuse to countenance the spread of Sharia law, which is not only inimical to our own deepest principles but aims to supplant our own laws.
Yet we are turning a blind eye to the steady Sharia-isation of our country.
We have ignored the development of informal parallel Sharia jurisdictions, enforced by Sharia courts, in areas heavily populated by Muslims.
We have not only turned a blind eye to the polygamous marriages they sanction in Britain, but now give extra welfare benefits to husbands settling here with multiple wives - even though bigamy is a crime.
Despite the fact that thousands of Muslim women are terrorised by the threat of "honour killings", only a few of these horrific cases result in prosecutions - because our police are terrified of being accused of "racism" if they pursue them.
Now Gordon Brown has said Britain should become the centre of global Islamic banking.
But this is heavily backed by Saudi Arabia which will use it to further its objective of Islamising the West - and may even provide a cover for the financing of further terror.
This craven appeasement of extremism gives Islamists the unmistakable message that Britain is theirs for the taking.
Thus truly 'moderate' Muslims are betrayed, and all of us are put in infinitely greater danger - not just from terrorism, but from a culture that still seems to be sleepwalking to oblivion.
And a few more extremists are being arrested. But at the same time, it is still appeasing radicalism.
It has become a cliche to say that most British Muslims are moderate.
Certainly, most of them undoubtedly would have no truck with terrorism or violence and encouragingly, a growing number are speaking out against Islamist extremism.
But extremist views are not confined to a few rogue elements.
Opinion polls suggest that more than 100,000 of our Muslim citizens think the July 2005 attacks in London were justified.
A report by the Policy Exchange think-tank revealed that around one third of British Muslims thought that if Muslims left the faith, they should be killed; and 37 per cent of 16-to-24-year-olds wanted to live in Britain under Sharia rather than English law.
These numbers subscribing to such extremist views are deeply disturbing. They swell the sea in which terrorism swims.
If this tide is to be held back, Islamist extremism in Britain must be stopped and British values reasserted and stoutly upheld.
To defeat such extremism, we have to make it abundantly clear that we will not give an inch to those who want to destroy our values.
But we appear instead to be doing nothing to stop the spread of radical Islamism.
Indeed, in a myriad different ways we are giving out the lethal message that we have neither the will nor the courage to defend our way of life.
British Muslims are being recruited in large numbers to terror because next to nothing is being done to stop it.
Last January, a Channel Four television Dispatches programme revealed that at certain mosques which were assumed to be moderate and which were even prominent in talking to other faiths, material was being preached and disseminated advocating such horrors as the murder of homosexuals, the beating of women and hatred of Christians and Jews.
Despite the Prime Minister's promise to outlaw the radical group Hizb ut Tahrir (which believes that Britain should be an Islamic state), the Government refuses to do so.
Yet, Ed Husain, an extremely brave former radical who has recanted, chillingly documents in his new book The Islamist the enormous influence of this group in telling countless British Muslims it's their duty to wage holy war, and that Muslims have a corresponding duty "to be prepared to launch attacks on Britain from within".
Not only are we failing to halt the spread of such lethally extremist views, we are also failing to hold the line for our own values.
Above all else, we should absolutely refuse to countenance the spread of Sharia law, which is not only inimical to our own deepest principles but aims to supplant our own laws.
Yet we are turning a blind eye to the steady Sharia-isation of our country.
We have ignored the development of informal parallel Sharia jurisdictions, enforced by Sharia courts, in areas heavily populated by Muslims.
We have not only turned a blind eye to the polygamous marriages they sanction in Britain, but now give extra welfare benefits to husbands settling here with multiple wives - even though bigamy is a crime.
Despite the fact that thousands of Muslim women are terrorised by the threat of "honour killings", only a few of these horrific cases result in prosecutions - because our police are terrified of being accused of "racism" if they pursue them.
Now Gordon Brown has said Britain should become the centre of global Islamic banking.
But this is heavily backed by Saudi Arabia which will use it to further its objective of Islamising the West - and may even provide a cover for the financing of further terror.
This craven appeasement of extremism gives Islamists the unmistakable message that Britain is theirs for the taking.
Thus truly 'moderate' Muslims are betrayed, and all of us are put in infinitely greater danger - not just from terrorism, but from a culture that still seems to be sleepwalking to oblivion.
VOTE IAN SUTTON - DARTON WEST.
Ian has been very busy since the last election campaigning in this ward. He has talked to many local people, and here he highlights some of the main concerns they have, and how he would tackle them. 
Labour Continues to Destroy Our Green Belt Land“People are very much concerned about losing our vital green belt land to new housing developments and industrial estates. Labour claims that many more new houses are needed because of high demand, but by bringing in so many new people every year we will never be able to keep pace with demand. Only the BNP can stop this”.
.JPG)
“There are many new developments taking place, such as this large block of flats on Beever Lane, Gawber, that are very unpopular with local residents. When these projects are in the planning stages the interests of the local people that are directly affected should be paramount. If elected I will ensure that residents concerns are listened to instead of being ignored”..JPG)
“A major concern of many people is anti-social behaviour such as vandalism and graffiti. We regularly see smashed bus shelters and defaced walls. The basic problem here is that the offenders know that if they’re caught there will be very little or no punishment. Our Party believes that firm deterrents should be in place for this sort of behaviour”.JPG)
“Heavy traffic through Barugh Green is now a major worry for parents of small children. This is because of the new road layout at Dodworth. It’s about time Labour thought out the likely effects of their sweeping changes before carrying them out. If elected I will push them hard to do just that”.THE BNP TAKES THE POSITION THAT IMMIGRATION INTO BRITAIN MUST STOP!
We believe that Britain is too small to accept the millions of people that want to come and live here. But the Government insists that Britain needs more and more immigrants to fill job vacancies, and that every developed country in the world is in the same position. This is just a lie.
Many countries in the world do not accept immigrants including for example, Japan and South Korea, both advanced countries. Other countries such as Australia and New Zealand are very particular about who they accept.
It seems that just about anyone in the entire world can come and live in Britain!
DO YOU WANT BRITAIN TO CHANGE?
The Establishment parties are now so constrained by political correctness and the demands of big business for cheap labour that they will never stop mass immigration into Britain. Even as the population rises – 70 million – 80 million – 90 million – they will take no action to stop it, and will vehemently attack any parties that say we should.
This is why you read so many lies about our party and its leaders in the press.
impact on life in Britain. Do you think that the tolerance and good nature of the British people is being taken advantage of?Some people seem to think that no matter how many foreigners come to live in Britain our country will remain British. How can this be so? Already the Muslims are having a major
BUT HOW CAN MY VOTE FOR THE BNP MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
Every single vote that our party receives is a thorn in the side of the Establishment parties because it tells them that their immigration policies are unpopular. Britain is just at the start of its transformation into a multi-racial society. What is planned is much more far reaching than what exists now. But don’t think that the other parties will realise their mistake and stop it happening. It’s now a central plank of their policy for Britain and unfortunately its our children and grandchildren who will suffer the consequences.
BNP: The Fear Factor – By Paul Harris, Barnsley Organiser
“I totally believe in everything the BNP says but I’m not going to join”.
That’s a line I’ve heard many times. If I say to them “why not join if you believe in it – you know it’s the last chance for Britain” I am met with a blank stare. “I’m just not going to join and that’s that”. Of course I know the real reason they’re not going to join. They won’t admit it but they’re scared.
So what are they afraid of? Do they think:-
As soon as they send the form off with their cheque the thought police will descend on their house, arrest them, and cart them off to a secret location for interrogation and torture. They will never see their families again.
As soon as they send the form off with their cheque their friends and family and everyone in the neighbourhood will immediately shun them, treat them like a leper, and want nothing more to do with them.
As soon as they send the form off with their cheque their boss at work will call them into the office and inform them that this company does not employ racists. They will be given their P45, and sent packing. They will then be blacklisted by a secret Government agency and will never work again.
As soon as they send the form off with their cheque they will be attacked in the street by a gang of four burly men who will give them a really good pasting. They will be beaten black and blue and have to spend a month in hospital.
So our potential BNP member decides “I’ll play safe and not join the Party – let someone else do it – I have got to think of myself first”
I joined the Party in December 2002. At that time there was only a handful of members in Barnsley. I don’t have a paranoid bone in my body. Unlike a lot of people I didn’t think for one second that I would be targeted by anyone. After all the BNP is a legally registered political party.
It was only a few months later, when the Party needed a candidate to stand in the May 2003 local elections I put my name forward. I must admit that at that point I felt a certain amount of trepidation. My name would be public as one of the first BNP candidates to stand in Barnsley. There was one other candidate who was standing with me in this election.
So you’re thinking, this guy has had it really hard ever since. He was sacked at work, has been beaten up in the street several times, has no one to call a friend, and is on the black list of just about every Government agency and employer in the country. Well actually – no.
Since I have been a member of the BNP and stood in 3 elections nothing whatsoever has happened to me. I have never lost a job or a friend because of my membership. In fact I have many many more friends than I ever had. At my place of work, which is a big multi-national, American owned company, everyone, including the management, knows I am in the BNP but nothing is said about it.
If someone joins the BNP their name will of course go onto a database of members on the membership department’s computer. This is then emailed to their local Organiser who keeps it on their own computer. This membership list however is treated with the highest level of security. Encryption software is used on all computers. When emailing membership lists PGP encryption software is used. PGP stands for ’Pretty Good Privacy’ but is actually extremely good privacy. It’s military grade encryption, which ironically is used by terrorist organisations to stop the Government intercepting and decoding their communications. It is 100% unbreakable by even the most powerful computers. These levels of security are not really necessary as my own experience shows, but they are rigidly enforced to reassure potential member that only themselves, and their local Organiser knows that they are a member.
In conclusion there is nothing to be afraid of in joining the BNP. Nothing will happen to you at all. It’s all a big bluff. Life will go on just as it did before you were a member. You will however have that knowledge in your heart that you are actually doing something to save this country for the future of our children and grandchildren.
So what are they afraid of? Do they think:-
As soon as they send the form off with their cheque the thought police will descend on their house, arrest them, and cart them off to a secret location for interrogation and torture. They will never see their families again.
As soon as they send the form off with their cheque their friends and family and everyone in the neighbourhood will immediately shun them, treat them like a leper, and want nothing more to do with them.
As soon as they send the form off with their cheque their boss at work will call them into the office and inform them that this company does not employ racists. They will be given their P45, and sent packing. They will then be blacklisted by a secret Government agency and will never work again.
As soon as they send the form off with their cheque they will be attacked in the street by a gang of four burly men who will give them a really good pasting. They will be beaten black and blue and have to spend a month in hospital.
So our potential BNP member decides “I’ll play safe and not join the Party – let someone else do it – I have got to think of myself first”
I joined the Party in December 2002. At that time there was only a handful of members in Barnsley. I don’t have a paranoid bone in my body. Unlike a lot of people I didn’t think for one second that I would be targeted by anyone. After all the BNP is a legally registered political party.
It was only a few months later, when the Party needed a candidate to stand in the May 2003 local elections I put my name forward. I must admit that at that point I felt a certain amount of trepidation. My name would be public as one of the first BNP candidates to stand in Barnsley. There was one other candidate who was standing with me in this election.
So you’re thinking, this guy has had it really hard ever since. He was sacked at work, has been beaten up in the street several times, has no one to call a friend, and is on the black list of just about every Government agency and employer in the country. Well actually – no.
Since I have been a member of the BNP and stood in 3 elections nothing whatsoever has happened to me. I have never lost a job or a friend because of my membership. In fact I have many many more friends than I ever had. At my place of work, which is a big multi-national, American owned company, everyone, including the management, knows I am in the BNP but nothing is said about it.
If someone joins the BNP their name will of course go onto a database of members on the membership department’s computer. This is then emailed to their local Organiser who keeps it on their own computer. This membership list however is treated with the highest level of security. Encryption software is used on all computers. When emailing membership lists PGP encryption software is used. PGP stands for ’Pretty Good Privacy’ but is actually extremely good privacy. It’s military grade encryption, which ironically is used by terrorist organisations to stop the Government intercepting and decoding their communications. It is 100% unbreakable by even the most powerful computers. These levels of security are not really necessary as my own experience shows, but they are rigidly enforced to reassure potential member that only themselves, and their local Organiser knows that they are a member.
In conclusion there is nothing to be afraid of in joining the BNP. Nothing will happen to you at all. It’s all a big bluff. Life will go on just as it did before you were a member. You will however have that knowledge in your heart that you are actually doing something to save this country for the future of our children and grandchildren.
Joseph Bramah
Those of you who are regular travellers up Market Hill have probably noticed a new Public House. It is called the Joseph Bramah but I wonder if any of the regulars, or come to think of it, anyone in Barnsley have ever heard of him or knows who he was. Joseph Bramah was born in 1748 in the village of Stainborough near Barnsley, the eldest of five children he was destined to work on his father's farm. In what little spare time he had, he made high quality musical instruments but when he was 16 years old, he had an accident to his ankle which made him lame and made it impossible for him to continue work on the farm. While he was confined at home it occurred to him that he was now of no use on the farm so he decided to become a mechanic instead. Accordingly, he was apprenticed to the village carpenter and by the time his apprenticeship was finished had acquired such skill that he determined to try his fortune in London. Despite his lame leg, he made the journey to London on foot and he soon found work with a cabinet maker. After some time, he set up in business and it was then that Bramah made his first successful invention, the modern water closet which he patented in 1778. Bramah then turned his attention to locks. Locks had been in general use since the early days of the Egyptians, but they had always been, and still were, of such an imperfect character that they could be picked very easily.
In 1784 he patented his lock which for many years had the reputation of being absolutely unpickable. He offered £200 to anyone who could pick his lock and although many tried it - it was not until 1851 that the money was won by an American who took him 16 days to do it! In 1785 he invented his Hydrostatic Machine. This name came into practical use but it was the forerunner of his Hydrostatic or Hydraulic Press which he patented in 1795. In 1797 he invented a beer-pump, and then a quill-sharpener. Bramah never seemed to be at a loss for inventions. Thus, when the Bank of England asked him to construct a machine for more quickly and accurately numbering bank notes, he proceeded to invent it in one month.
He then turned his attention to the writing implements of the day and invented a machine for making quill pens which continued in use until the steel nib was invented.The last patent (at one time he held more than 20) of his versatile genius was that taken out in 1814 for the purpose of applying Roman cement to timber to prevent dry rot. Joseph Bramah should deservedly be remembered and admired as one of the earliest mechanical geniuses of his day but sadly due to anti-British, self loathing credentials of marxist-liberals that run our educational system it is doubtful that any pupil in Barnsley will ever know who he was. They would obviously much rather our future generations grow up with no knowledge of their own history or culture just in case the flood of immigrants pouring in from countries whom have more or less contributed nothing to the civilised world start to get jealous and upset.
Mark Kaye
SUDDEN JIHAD SYNDROME (SJS)
Sudden Jihad syndrome is when a single Muslim, or small group of Muslims, suddenly and with little or no warning go into Jihad mode. The victims are kaffirs attacked at random.
The main characteristics of SJS attacks are that:
There is no central planning - they are totally spontaneous.
The victims are unknown to the Jihadists.
They are unreported or underreported in the MSM, with even the most horrendous cases seldom being reported beyond the local press.
The MSM usually attempt to conceal the attackers’ religion.
If the the attackers are obviously Muslim then the MSM deny that this is of relevance.
Known SJS attacks to date (and given the attitude of the MSM there may be many more which are unknown) are listed below.
FEB 1997 Palestinian Muslim opened fire on the observation deck of Empire State Building, killing a tourist and injuring six other people before committing suicide -
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/015330.php
NOV 1999 Muslim pilot mutters prayer then smashes plane into ocean killing all aboard. -
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/11/18/egyptair/
NOV 2003 Charlene Downes (March 25, 1989 - on or after November 1, 2003) was a teenager from Blackpool, Great Britain, who was murdered at age of 14. Charlene disappeared on November 1, 2003. She has never been seen since then and her body has not been found. In March 2006 two Muslims were charged with her murder. These two Muslims were owners of a takeaway restaurant, and a local newspaper reported that they cut up and disposed body of their victim in the food sold at the restaurant. Far right organisations in Britain criticised the mainstream media for suppressing the information about the murder because the two accused men are foreign born (from Jordan and Iran). -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlene_Downes
MAR 2004 15 year old Kris Donald abducted at random by Muslims. He sustained internal injuries to three arteries, one of his lungs, his liver and a kidney, his eyes were gouged out and he was castrated, he was finally doused in petrol, set on fire and left to die. Despite the horrendous nature the case featured on national news only three times and was later largely confined to regional Scottish bulletins -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriss_Donald
SEP 2004 A woman was killed and another was left fighting for her life after a knifeman went berserk in broad daylight in a Greater Manchester street. The woman killed was attacked first by the man, who was carrying what appeared to be a kitchen knife with a six-inch blade and had been seen reading from the Koran. The man was arrested but no further reports of any trial appeared in the MSM. -
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/003071.php
MAR 2006, a twenty-two-year-old Iranian student named Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar drove an SUV onto the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, deliberately trying to kill people and succeeding in injuring nine. After the incident, he seemed singularly pleased with himself, smiling and waving to crowds after a court appearance on Monday, at which he explained that he was “thankful for the opportunity to spread the will of Allah.” -
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/011397.php
JUL 2006, a Muslim named Naveed Afzal Haq forced his way into the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle and then began shooting, killing one woman and injuring five more. -
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003159826_webbelltown28.html
AUG 2006 A Muslim from Afghanistan killed one person and injured fourteen during a murderous drive through San Francisco city streets during which he targeted people on crosswalks and sidewalks. He identified himself as a terrorist after his rampage -
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/08/30/FREMONT.TMP
JAN 2007 Rampage behind the wheel leaves trail of destruction. A Muslim havoc in north Minneapolis, ramming into at least eight cars and injuring a business owner, police said. When asked by investigators why he went on the crime spree, the 22-year-old suspect said, “Allah made me do it,” according to a source with knowledge of the case. -
http://www.startribune.com/467/story/972154.html
FEB 2007 Muslim Sulejmen Talovic killed five people and wounded four before he himself was killed by an off-duty Ogden police officer who happened to be in the Salt Lake City mall. -http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26961 Hat tip
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26961
The main characteristics of SJS attacks are that:
There is no central planning - they are totally spontaneous.
The victims are unknown to the Jihadists.
They are unreported or underreported in the MSM, with even the most horrendous cases seldom being reported beyond the local press.
The MSM usually attempt to conceal the attackers’ religion.
If the the attackers are obviously Muslim then the MSM deny that this is of relevance.
Known SJS attacks to date (and given the attitude of the MSM there may be many more which are unknown) are listed below.
FEB 1997 Palestinian Muslim opened fire on the observation deck of Empire State Building, killing a tourist and injuring six other people before committing suicide -
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/015330.php
NOV 1999 Muslim pilot mutters prayer then smashes plane into ocean killing all aboard. -
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/11/18/egyptair/
NOV 2003 Charlene Downes (March 25, 1989 - on or after November 1, 2003) was a teenager from Blackpool, Great Britain, who was murdered at age of 14. Charlene disappeared on November 1, 2003. She has never been seen since then and her body has not been found. In March 2006 two Muslims were charged with her murder. These two Muslims were owners of a takeaway restaurant, and a local newspaper reported that they cut up and disposed body of their victim in the food sold at the restaurant. Far right organisations in Britain criticised the mainstream media for suppressing the information about the murder because the two accused men are foreign born (from Jordan and Iran). -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlene_Downes
MAR 2004 15 year old Kris Donald abducted at random by Muslims. He sustained internal injuries to three arteries, one of his lungs, his liver and a kidney, his eyes were gouged out and he was castrated, he was finally doused in petrol, set on fire and left to die. Despite the horrendous nature the case featured on national news only three times and was later largely confined to regional Scottish bulletins -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriss_Donald
SEP 2004 A woman was killed and another was left fighting for her life after a knifeman went berserk in broad daylight in a Greater Manchester street. The woman killed was attacked first by the man, who was carrying what appeared to be a kitchen knife with a six-inch blade and had been seen reading from the Koran. The man was arrested but no further reports of any trial appeared in the MSM. -
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/003071.php
MAR 2006, a twenty-two-year-old Iranian student named Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar drove an SUV onto the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, deliberately trying to kill people and succeeding in injuring nine. After the incident, he seemed singularly pleased with himself, smiling and waving to crowds after a court appearance on Monday, at which he explained that he was “thankful for the opportunity to spread the will of Allah.” -
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/011397.php
JUL 2006, a Muslim named Naveed Afzal Haq forced his way into the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle and then began shooting, killing one woman and injuring five more. -
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003159826_webbelltown28.html
AUG 2006 A Muslim from Afghanistan killed one person and injured fourteen during a murderous drive through San Francisco city streets during which he targeted people on crosswalks and sidewalks. He identified himself as a terrorist after his rampage -
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/08/30/FREMONT.TMP
JAN 2007 Rampage behind the wheel leaves trail of destruction. A Muslim havoc in north Minneapolis, ramming into at least eight cars and injuring a business owner, police said. When asked by investigators why he went on the crime spree, the 22-year-old suspect said, “Allah made me do it,” according to a source with knowledge of the case. -
http://www.startribune.com/467/story/972154.html
FEB 2007 Muslim Sulejmen Talovic killed five people and wounded four before he himself was killed by an off-duty Ogden police officer who happened to be in the Salt Lake City mall. -http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26961 Hat tip
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26961
Mark Kaye wrote
Channel 4 has done us all a great service in exposing the vile racism and hatred which lurks within British society. The camera has laid bare the vicious enmity which so many of our fellow citizens harbour towards those of different ethnic backgrounds and religious beliefs. But, no, I'm not talking about Big Brother, I'm referring to Dispatches. Secret filming of incendiary sermons at some of Britain's leading 'moderate' mosques reinforced the findings of Sue Reid's investigation in last Saturday's Daily Mail into Islamic rabble-rousing in the Home Counties. It would be sloppy shorthand to describe the revelations as 'shocking'. Alarming, maybe, but not much of a shock. This documentary only served to confirm what many of us have long taken as read - namely that what is preached inside a substantial number of Muslim places of worship in Britain is diametrically opposed to what 'community leaders' say for public consumption. Over four months, Dispatches recorded an assortment of mad mullahs calling for 'jihad' (holy war) against the 'kuffaar' (unbelievers). Muslims are urged to hit women who refuse to wear the hijab, kill homosexuals, reject British law and democracy and set up in this country an Islamic state within a state. Praise is lavished on those who kill British soldiers, particularly the Taliban. "The hero of Islam is the one who separated his head from his shoulder," screams one imam at the Sparkbrook mosque, in Birmingham, which has been hailed by Tony Blair for its contribution to its "multi-faith and multicultural activities". The unrelenting message is one of Muslim world domination and denigration of 'infidels'. At the nearby Green Lane mosque, Channel 4' s undercover reporter was directed to a secret website where the popular convert Abu Assama preaches that Jews and Christians are the enemy of Islam and it is the duty of all Muslims to fight them. Green Lane mosque, bankrolled by Saudi Arabia, is the headquarters of the radical organisation Markali Jamat Ahi-Hadith, which is affiliated to the 'moderate' Muslim Council of Britain. At the Regent's Park mosque, in London, as well as many others throughout Britain, DVDs disseminating the most disgusting slurs on the 'kuffaar' are on open sale.
Needless to say, the 'moderates' who run these mosques deny any knowledge of the preachers of hate and their violent propaganda, which almost exclusively follows the teachings of the extremist Wahhabi movement in Saudi Arabia. They claim not to be able to control what is sold in their bookshops or what is said in their mosques or community halls, which are hired to a number of outside groups. If they popped their heads round the door for 30 seconds they wouldn't be left in much doubt. Can you imagine what would happen if a Conservative Club was regularly letting its function room to white supremacists? A couple of weeks ago, after the Guardian had wasted seven months on an undercover investigation telling us that the BNP are unpleasant, I wondered why neither they nor the rest of the so-called 'liberal' media ever bothered looking in to what goes on in Britain's mosques. So Dispatches is to be congratulated on this exposé and its reporter on his bravery. If there were any justice, this programme would win a BAFTA. But it won't. The 'anti-racism' brigade isn’t interested in these inconvenient truths about Islamic fanatics. I looked in vain for any mention of this programme in the Guardian, or its mini-me, the Independent. Nothing, nada, zilch. Unless I missed something, it didn't even warrant a line on Channel 4 News, which immediately preceded Dispatches - even though cross-promotion is the lifeblood of any TV network. Curiously, there have been no questions in the House, either. Surely the police were investigating the Dispatches revelations with a view to bringing prosecutions for incitement to violence and racial hatred - especially against the backdrop of this week's London Transport terror trial. Er, not as such. Perhaps the Old Bill is too busy sifting through the e-mails about 'racism' on Big Brother. In the normal course of events, I wouldn't even dignify this fatuous freak show with any comment. I've never seen it and have no intention of ever watching it. I don't suppose Gordon Brown has seen it, either, any more than he listens to the Arctic Monkeys. But that didn't stop him commenting on it, even though he hasn't said a word about the increase in mortgage rates, the Himalayan personal debt mountain or the highest inflation figures for 14 years - which are supposed to come within his area of competence. Most MPs watch TV only when they're appearing on it. But still 24 of them have found the time to sign a Commons motion expressing outrage about what a pig in lipstick said to a Bollywood actress they'd never heard of. Any opportunity to flaunt their 'anti-racist' credentials, while remaining blithely indifferent to the latest evidence of the very real threat Islamic fanaticism poses to the safety and security of our society. For crying out loud. Channel 4 News, which completely ignored Dispatches, has been filling its boots with Big Brother 'racism'. In India, where no one has seen it either, effigies of Big Brother's producers have been burnt in the street by an 'angry mob' of half a dozen layabouts from central casting rounded up for the benefit of the British TV cameras. If you believe the hype, this is a rerun of the ridiculous Danish cartoons episode. Which it isn't.
I'm sure the overwhelming majority of the Indian people couldn't give a monkey's. If anyone is to blame, it's Shilpa Shetty's agent, who should have watched a few old videos of Big Brother before pitching her into this mindless menagerie and exposing her to the high priestess of the slagocracy. Still, it allows everyone to revel in their own self-righteousness and gives the Guardianistas the chance to lord their moral superiority over Britain's burgeoning underclass of 'white trash' (no racism, there, then). We're told there have been more than 20,000 phone calls of complaint. I imagine every handset connected to the Endemol switchboard has been on speed dial. The show might have lost its sponsor, but there'll be another one along in a minute. Most depressing of all is that off the back of this artificial outrage, the viewing figures for Big Brother have risen to 5.7 million. Meanwhile, Dispatches: Undercover Mosque attracted only 1.5 million viewers. It deserves a wider audience.
Terror Unbound: 14 years old Hindu child burnt alive
West Bengal: The constant aggression of Islamic terror continues to haunt the Hindus of West Bengal. The severe atrocities on the Hindus by Islamic radicals in the Muslim populated villages of West Bengal are forcing thousands of Hindus to leave their ancestral lands and villages and migrate away silently. The Muslim dominated villages of 24 Parganas(s) and 24 Parganas(n), Malda, Nadia and Murshidabad, have become hot breeding grounds of terrorists and every day there are more and more incidents of unbound terror and atrocities on the Hindus while the Left Government and the West Bengal Police remain a silent spectator with its severe pro-Islamic, anti-Hindu stand.
Samrat Mondal is only 14. He was a student of class 8 and lived with his family in the village of Kharimachan of Basanti village in 24 parganas(s) West Bengal.
On the evening of 4th May 2007, a gang of 20 Muslims led by Gausher Ali Gayen, Samsher Ali Gayen, caught Samrat at gun point in the middle of the field when he was returning from school and forced him into a ditch. Few Muslims held him down forcefully while the others poured Kerosene oil on the innocent boy and finally set him on fire.
All the other Muslims about 20 of them, and some young Muslim boys who were playing in the nearby field, watched and laughed as Samrat was burning heavily and not a single person came to his help.
With the fire catching up on his entire body, Samrat ran towards a shallow pond to save his life. He jumped in that pond and tossing himself repeatedly in the mud he was finally able to stop the fire but by then he was already 50% burnt, the skin from his body and lower abdomen ripping away as he became unconscious in the tremendous pain.
Samrat Mondal is a Hindu. Samarat's father Surat Chandra Mondal migrated with his family from Satkhira of Bangladesh about two decades ago, being constantly subjected to Islamic persecution and social pressure there, a common phenomenon in Islamic Bangladesh, like millions of Hindus he came to India in search of an honorable life as a Hindu and settled in the village of Kharimachan of Basanti village in 24 parganas(s) of West Bengal.
In the Muslim populated villages of West Bengal where the condition of Hindus are not very much different and in some areas even worse than Islamic Bangladesh, looting of Hindu houses, cattle lifting, desecrating and profaning Hindu idols, molesting Hindu women is being openly carried on with the moral support of the Islamic Radicals and tacit support of the leftists.
Surat Mondal's house was looted by notorious Muslim criminals Gausher Ali Gayen and his gang for four consecutive days. Every time their house was looted, Surat Mondal complained to the local left controlled village Panchayat and its leader Samsuddin Mollah in vain and finally on the third day, when the looters came and put fire on his house Surat Mondal resorted to complain to the local Basanti Police Station on 4th of May 2007 and pleaded for justice. But, the police refused to take a complain as the assailants were all Muslims and protected by the ruling left front parties and instead Surat Mondal was told to go away.
On the evening of the same day there was a grand opening of a mosque in the village. Surprisingly, unlike the other days all the Muslim boys gathered in the paddy fields behind Surat Mondal's house and started a mock football match.
Beside, the same paddy field a group of 20 Muslims, with fire arms and Kerosene waited for Samrat Mondal, who usually came back this way everyday after school. Their intention was to burn him alive and cast terror within the mind of the Hindus.
After the fire was set and Samarat was burning heavily and running with fire catching up all his body the Muslim boys playing in the field stood by and shouted and laughed their breath out to suppress Samrat's cry of pain so that nobody could hear him.
This heinous action proves the involvement of Islamic radicals and well formulated planned action of terror which had the involvement of the entire Muslim population of the village as a whole.
After Samrat fainted, his uncle who was luckily passing by rescued him and Samrat was admitted in Canning Hospital.
The first thing that Samrat told after gaining consciousness in the morning are the names of criminals to the police who put fire on him, 1. Gausher Ali Gayen 2. Jamshek Gayen 3. Shamsher Ali.
The police though registered a case but never bothered to take any action against these criminals and the gang and they still roam freely on village roads of Basanti, threatening the Hindus who morally stood behind Surat Mondal's family.
The criminals with the full support of the village panchayat leader Shamsuddin Mollah and Lokman Mollah, the notorious communal leftist leader of Basanti forced Surat Monadal to leave the village. Surat Mondal had no option other than to sell away his entire land and house at a throw away half of the actual price and arrange for funds for the treatment of his severely burnt only son.
The entire family of Surat Mondal consisting about 14 members has migrated from the village now and is staying with a relative's family in a small room, in the outskirts of Kolkata.
With all his funds exhausted for the treatment of Samrat who received more than 50% burn and a deadly virus due to contamination in the Government Hospital, the family which came to India for an honorable living as a Hindu have no-where to go now .Only Darkness looms on their fate and of the millions of Hindus as West Bengal slowly withers towards the formation of another Islamic state.
SOURCE
Samrat Mondal is only 14. He was a student of class 8 and lived with his family in the village of Kharimachan of Basanti village in 24 parganas(s) West Bengal.
On the evening of 4th May 2007, a gang of 20 Muslims led by Gausher Ali Gayen, Samsher Ali Gayen, caught Samrat at gun point in the middle of the field when he was returning from school and forced him into a ditch. Few Muslims held him down forcefully while the others poured Kerosene oil on the innocent boy and finally set him on fire.
All the other Muslims about 20 of them, and some young Muslim boys who were playing in the nearby field, watched and laughed as Samrat was burning heavily and not a single person came to his help.
With the fire catching up on his entire body, Samrat ran towards a shallow pond to save his life. He jumped in that pond and tossing himself repeatedly in the mud he was finally able to stop the fire but by then he was already 50% burnt, the skin from his body and lower abdomen ripping away as he became unconscious in the tremendous pain.
Samrat Mondal is a Hindu. Samarat's father Surat Chandra Mondal migrated with his family from Satkhira of Bangladesh about two decades ago, being constantly subjected to Islamic persecution and social pressure there, a common phenomenon in Islamic Bangladesh, like millions of Hindus he came to India in search of an honorable life as a Hindu and settled in the village of Kharimachan of Basanti village in 24 parganas(s) of West Bengal.
In the Muslim populated villages of West Bengal where the condition of Hindus are not very much different and in some areas even worse than Islamic Bangladesh, looting of Hindu houses, cattle lifting, desecrating and profaning Hindu idols, molesting Hindu women is being openly carried on with the moral support of the Islamic Radicals and tacit support of the leftists.
Surat Mondal's house was looted by notorious Muslim criminals Gausher Ali Gayen and his gang for four consecutive days. Every time their house was looted, Surat Mondal complained to the local left controlled village Panchayat and its leader Samsuddin Mollah in vain and finally on the third day, when the looters came and put fire on his house Surat Mondal resorted to complain to the local Basanti Police Station on 4th of May 2007 and pleaded for justice. But, the police refused to take a complain as the assailants were all Muslims and protected by the ruling left front parties and instead Surat Mondal was told to go away.
On the evening of the same day there was a grand opening of a mosque in the village. Surprisingly, unlike the other days all the Muslim boys gathered in the paddy fields behind Surat Mondal's house and started a mock football match.
Beside, the same paddy field a group of 20 Muslims, with fire arms and Kerosene waited for Samrat Mondal, who usually came back this way everyday after school. Their intention was to burn him alive and cast terror within the mind of the Hindus.
After the fire was set and Samarat was burning heavily and running with fire catching up all his body the Muslim boys playing in the field stood by and shouted and laughed their breath out to suppress Samrat's cry of pain so that nobody could hear him.
This heinous action proves the involvement of Islamic radicals and well formulated planned action of terror which had the involvement of the entire Muslim population of the village as a whole.
After Samrat fainted, his uncle who was luckily passing by rescued him and Samrat was admitted in Canning Hospital.
The first thing that Samrat told after gaining consciousness in the morning are the names of criminals to the police who put fire on him, 1. Gausher Ali Gayen 2. Jamshek Gayen 3. Shamsher Ali.
The police though registered a case but never bothered to take any action against these criminals and the gang and they still roam freely on village roads of Basanti, threatening the Hindus who morally stood behind Surat Mondal's family.
The criminals with the full support of the village panchayat leader Shamsuddin Mollah and Lokman Mollah, the notorious communal leftist leader of Basanti forced Surat Monadal to leave the village. Surat Mondal had no option other than to sell away his entire land and house at a throw away half of the actual price and arrange for funds for the treatment of his severely burnt only son.
The entire family of Surat Mondal consisting about 14 members has migrated from the village now and is staying with a relative's family in a small room, in the outskirts of Kolkata.
With all his funds exhausted for the treatment of Samrat who received more than 50% burn and a deadly virus due to contamination in the Government Hospital, the family which came to India for an honorable living as a Hindu have no-where to go now .Only Darkness looms on their fate and of the millions of Hindus as West Bengal slowly withers towards the formation of another Islamic state.
SOURCE
Now take alook at this site. 
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
